When it comes to housing policy (and many other policies), elections matter SO much. Our Founder has personally worked with Mayor Breed's office and many of the Supervisors over the past years and has first hand knowledge of which candidates will be best for our great city. Her efforts in tracking legislation have clearly highlighted the positions of each Supervisor.
No one has done more for housing reform than Mayor Breed. Her team is incredibly knowledgeable about the permitting and planning processes and has been very proactive in getting permit timelines streamlined for her entire tenure.
If you're frustrated with the state of the City, it's important to remember the Mayor is limited by the Board of Supervisors. If a moderate Mayor, like Mayor Breed, is counterbalanced by a "progressive" Board like the one we've had, then very little can be accomplished. Often Supervisor elections come down to just a hundred votes. That's why every single vote counts. We hope you'll join us in voting for moderates across the board including:
Mayor Breed (really anyone except Aaron Peskin please)
Marjan Philhour: District 1
Danny Sauter: District 3
Bilal Mahmood: District 5
Matt Boschetto: District 7
Trevor Chandler: District 9
Michael Lai: District 11
Don't just take our word for it, Grow SF has put together a terrific voter guide. https://lnkd.in/g3N2iu34
#VOTE #ElectionsMatter #ModerateDemocratsPlease #HousingReform
National Sales Manager for HOA / Condo Management Companies.
1wOn solutions, being a retired owner of a property managtement firm with 4,400 units via 3rd party management and few dozen owned rental units, there is no one silver bullet. Yet there are many small solutions, that in combination can very helpful for all stateholders. Zoning and regulations need to exist, yet can become excessive if not looked at hollistically. If excessive regilations and/or restrictive zoning = dramatically fewer units built and/or a longer time to go online (10+ years in some states/cities) and/or more expensive, then maybe those regulations and zoning need to be reviewed for potential modernaton. Adding what used to be called "in-law" apartments, could be a win-win for tenants with very limited budgets and much needed income for middle-class families. In many parts of the country these ACU's could be built for $25K-$100K. Rents could be $400,$1,500/month plus utlities, which is a part of the market that is always under serviced. I am not a developer and all RE is local, but I hope that this information is helpful to all policy makers, as this is not a Red or Blue issue. It's a failure of too little creative win-win thnking.