ASOR

ASOR

Armed Forces

Maxwell AFB, Alabama 312 followers

ASOR: Air & Space Operations Review

About us

ASOR, the operational flagship journal of the DAF, is a refereed open forum for innovation, military doctrine, military strategy, force structure, readiness, and other matters of critical importance to operations.

Website
https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/ASOR/
Industry
Armed Forces
Company size
2-10 employees
Headquarters
Maxwell AFB, Alabama
Type
Government Agency
Founded
2022
Specialties
Military and United States Air Force

Locations

Updates

  • The Spring issue is live! Air & Space Operations Review Vol 3, No. 1 considers various aspects of air operations and planning and strategy, including the B-21 Raider, airfields as centers of gravity, analytic standards for operational and tactical military intelligence analysts, the history of operational art, JADC2 and the concepts of decision advantage and initiative, and a novel approach to deterrence in the space domain. The issue concludes with a series of reviews of the recent miniseries, Masters of the Air, by Air University faculty members. Read it all here! https://lnkd.in/g_Kx-t3J #airpower #militaryintelligence #JADC2 #airoperations Air University Press Air University United States Air Force United States Space Force Jonathan K. Corrado

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Call for Articles - Suicide Prevention, Intervention, and Postvention While suicide devastates families, communities, and society whenever and wherever it occurs, the effects of suicide in the military touch the institution and its members in potentially deeper and more profound and far-reaching ways. The drivers of suicidal thoughts, attempts, and in the most tragic instances, suicide, are a regular feature of military life and work—deployments, the conduct of war and killing, and intense focus on performance and responsibility under persistent scrutiny. Suicide affects society in its entirety, and at times, rates of suicide—both attempts and completed—in the military and the veteran community have been consistent with the same rates among similar demographics in the larger civilian society. Yet, over the past eight years, suicide rates have climbed 30 percent for military members. In 2023, America lost 364 of its active duty military members and 156 of its reserve component members to suicide. A five-year Pentagon study released in May found that between 2014 and 2019, suicides (883) took more military members lives than accidents (814) , and over 8 times more than combat (96). In addition to the emotional toll on members and their families, suicide deeply affects military unit morale, readiness, and recruiting. One of the basic tenets of service in the military is the understanding by all that military members and their families are exactly that—members. They are members of a “team of teams,” and the organization is responsible to foster an environment where the members of these teams care for and care with one another. Suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention are thus the responsibility of the military—perhaps its greatest responsibility. ASOR is soliciting submissions of research-based articles for an upcoming issue devoted to the challenge of suicide from the perspective of clinicians, researchers, and practitioners in the areas of prevention, intervention, and postvention, civilian and military. What does the data say about where the military is today on this issue? What best practices can be learned from civil society? What socioecological factors impact suicide? Where are the military gaps in supporting its members, and where has the military made gains against this tragic fact of military service? Draft articles are being accepted through December 1, 2024. Please see https://ow.ly/vpUB50TAwRv for complete submission information.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Call for Articles - Suicide Prevention, Intervention, and Postvention While suicide devastates families, communities, and society whenever and wherever it occurs, the effects of suicide in the military touch the institution and its members in potentially deeper and more profound and far-reaching ways. The drivers of suicidal thoughts, attempts, and in the most tragic instances, suicide, are a regular feature of military life and work—deployments, the conduct of war and killing, and intense focus on performance and responsibility under persistent scrutiny. Suicide affects society in its entirety, and at times, rates of suicide—both attempts and completed—in the military and the veteran community have been consistent with the same rates among similar demographics in the larger civilian society. Yet, over the past eight years, suicide rates have climbed 30 percent for military members. In 2023, America lost 364 of its active duty military members and 156 of its reserve component members to suicide. A five-year Pentagon study released in May found that between 2014 and 2019, suicides (883) took more military members lives than accidents (814) , and over 8 times more than combat (96). In addition to the emotional toll on members and their families, suicide deeply affects military unit morale, readiness, and recruiting. One of the basic tenets of service in the military is the understanding by all that military members and their families are exactly that—members. They are members of a “team of teams,” and the organization is responsible to foster an environment where the members of these teams care for and care with one another. Suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention are thus the responsibility of the military—perhaps its greatest responsibility. ASOR is soliciting submissions of research-based articles for an upcoming issue devoted to the challenge of suicide from the perspective of clinicians, researchers, and practitioners in the areas of prevention, intervention, and postvention, civilian and military. What does the data say about where the military is today on this issue? What best practices can be learned from civil society? What socioecological factors impact suicide? Where are the military gaps in supporting its members, and where has the military made gains against this tragic fact of military service? Draft articles are being accepted through December 1, 2024. Please see https://ow.ly/vpUB50TAwRv for complete submission information.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Call for Articles - Suicide Prevention, Intervention, and Postvention While suicide devastates families, communities, and society whenever and wherever it occurs, the effects of suicide in the military touch the institution and its members in potentially deeper and more profound and far-reaching ways. The drivers of suicidal thoughts, attempts, and in the most tragic instances, suicide, are a regular feature of military life and work—deployments, the conduct of war and killing, and intense focus on performance and responsibility under persistent scrutiny. Suicide affects society in its entirety, and at times, rates of suicide—both attempts and completed—in the military and the veteran community have been consistent with the same rates among similar demographics in the larger civilian society. Yet, over the past eight years, suicide rates have climbed 30 percent for military members. In 2023, America lost 364 of its active duty military members and 156 of its reserve component members to suicide. A five-year Pentagon study released in May found that between 2014 and 2019, suicides (883) took more military members lives than accidents (814) , and over 8 times more than combat (96). In addition to the emotional toll on members and their families, suicide deeply affects military unit morale, readiness, and recruiting. One of the basic tenets of service in the military is the understanding by all that military members and their families are exactly that—members. They are members of a “team of teams,” and the organization is responsible to foster an environment where the members of these teams care for and care with one another. Suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention are thus the responsibility of the military—perhaps its greatest responsibility. ASOR is soliciting submissions of research-based articles for an upcoming issue devoted to the challenge of suicide from the perspective of clinicians, researchers, and practitioners in the areas of prevention, intervention, and postvention, civilian and military. What does the data say about where the military is today on this issue? What best practices can be learned from civil society? What socioecological factors impact suicide? Where are the military gaps in supporting its members, and where has the military made gains against this tragic fact of military service? Draft articles are being accepted through December 1, 2024. Please see https://ow.ly/vpUB50TAwRv for complete submission information.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Call for Articles - Suicide Prevention, Intervention, and Postvention While suicide devastates families, communities, and society whenever and wherever it occurs, the effects of suicide in the military touch the institution and its members in potentially deeper and more profound and far-reaching ways. The drivers of suicidal thoughts, attempts, and in the most tragic instances, suicide, are a regular feature of military life and work—deployments, the conduct of war and killing, and intense focus on performance and responsibility under persistent scrutiny. Suicide affects society in its entirety, and at times, rates of suicide—both attempts and completed—in the military and the veteran community have been consistent with the same rates among similar demographics in the larger civilian society. Yet, over the past eight years, suicide rates have climbed 30 percent for military members. In 2023, America lost 364 of its active duty military members and 156 of its reserve component members to suicide. A five-year Pentagon study released in May found that between 2014 and 2019, suicides (883) took more military members lives than accidents (814) , and over 8 times more than combat (96). In addition to the emotional toll on members and their families, suicide deeply affects military unit morale, readiness, and recruiting. One of the basic tenets of service in the military is the understanding by all that military members and their families are exactly that—members. They are members of a “team of teams,” and the organization is responsible to foster an environment where the members of these teams care for and care with one another. Suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention are thus the responsibility of the military—perhaps its greatest responsibility. ASOR is soliciting submissions of research-based articles for an upcoming issue devoted to the challenge of suicide from the perspective of clinicians, researchers, and practitioners in the areas of prevention, intervention, and postvention, civilian and military. What does the data say about where the military is today on this issue? What best practices can be learned from civil society? What socioecological factors impact suicide? Where are the military gaps in supporting its members, and where has the military made gains against this tragic fact of military service? Draft articles are being accepted through December 1, 2024. Please see https://ow.ly/vpUB50TAwRv for complete submission information.

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • From ASOR Vol 3 No 2, Summer 2024: "Combat Casualty Care: Engaging Allies and Partners in a DoD Global Trauma System" by Mason H. Remondelli, Ryan M. Leone, Collin Todd, Natalia K. Barzanji, Jennifer M. Gurney, Teri Duquette-Frame, Jason B. Brill, and Derek J. Licina Enhancing the US DoD combatant command trauma system by incorporating Ally and partner nations represents a critical opportunity for improving geostrategic alliances and building partner-nation capacity. Read Online: https://ow.ly/ismT50TAe6b Download the full journal: https://ow.ly/87K150TAe6e #AUPress #ASORJournal #USAF #MilitaryJournal #Airpower #Spacepower

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • From ASOR Vol 3 No 2, Summer 2024: "Combat Casualty Care: Engaging Allies and Partners in a DoD Global Trauma System" by Mason H. Remondelli, Ryan M. Leone, Collin Todd, Natalia K. Barzanji, Jennifer M. Gurney, Teri Duquette-Frame, Jason B. Brill, and Derek J. Licina Enhancing the US DoD combatant command trauma system by incorporating Ally and partner nations represents a critical opportunity for improving geostrategic alliances and building partner-nation capacity. Read Online: https://ow.ly/ismT50TAe6b Download the full journal: https://ow.ly/87K150TAe6e #AUPress #ASORJournal #USAF #MilitaryJournal #Airpower #Spacepower

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • From ASOR Vol 3 No 2, Summer 2024: "Combat Casualty Care: Engaging Allies and Partners in a DoD Global Trauma System" by Mason H. Remondelli, Ryan M. Leone, Collin Todd, Natalia K. Barzanji, Jennifer M. Gurney, Teri Duquette-Frame, Jason B. Brill, and Derek J. Licina Enhancing the US DoD combatant command trauma system by incorporating Ally and partner nations represents a critical opportunity for improving geostrategic alliances and building partner-nation capacity. Read Online: https://ow.ly/ismT50TAe6b Download the full journal: https://ow.ly/87K150TAe6e #AUPress #ASORJournal #USAF #MilitaryJournal #Airpower #Spacepower

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • From ASOR Vol 3 No 2, Summer 2024: "Combat Casualty Care: Engaging Allies and Partners in a DoD Global Trauma System" by Mason H. Remondelli, Ryan M. Leone, Collin Todd, Natalia K. Barzanji, Jennifer M. Gurney, Teri Duquette-Frame, Jason B. Brill, and Derek J. Licina Enhancing the US DoD combatant command trauma system by incorporating Ally and partner nations represents a critical opportunity for improving geostrategic alliances and building partner-nation capacity. Read Online: https://ow.ly/ismT50TAe6b Download the full journal: https://ow.ly/87K150TAe6e #AUPress #ASORJournal #USAF #MilitaryJournal #Airpower #Spacepower

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Call for Articles - Suicide Prevention, Intervention, and Postvention While suicide devastates families, communities, and society whenever and wherever it occurs, the effects of suicide in the military touch the institution and its members in potentially deeper and more profound and far-reaching ways. The drivers of suicidal thoughts, attempts, and in the most tragic instances, suicide, are a regular feature of military life and work—deployments, the conduct of war and killing, and intense focus on performance and responsibility under persistent scrutiny. Suicide affects society in its entirety, and at times, rates of suicide—both attempts and completed—in the military and the veteran community have been consistent with the same rates among similar demographics in the larger civilian society. Yet, over the past eight years, suicide rates have climbed 30 percent for military members. In 2023, America lost 364 of its active duty military members and 156 of its reserve component members to suicide. A five-year Pentagon study released in May found that between 2014 and 2019, suicides (883) took more military members lives than accidents (814) , and over 8 times more than combat (96). In addition to the emotional toll on members and their families, suicide deeply affects military unit morale, readiness, and recruiting. One of the basic tenets of service in the military is the understanding by all that military members and their families are exactly that—members. They are members of a “team of teams,” and the organization is responsible to foster an environment where the members of these teams care for and care with one another. Suicide prevention, intervention, and postvention are thus the responsibility of the military—perhaps its greatest responsibility. ASOR is soliciting submissions of research-based articles for an upcoming issue devoted to the challenge of suicide from the perspective of clinicians, researchers, and practitioners in the areas of prevention, intervention, and postvention, civilian and military. What does the data say about where the military is today on this issue? What best practices can be learned from civil society? What socioecological factors impact suicide? Where are the military gaps in supporting its members, and where has the military made gains against this tragic fact of military service? Draft articles are being accepted through December 1, 2024. Please see https://ow.ly/vpUB50TAwRv for complete submission information.

    • No alternative text description for this image

Similar pages