Two developers clash over project approaches. How do you navigate their conflicting strategies?
When developers clash over project approaches, bridging the gap is essential for project continuity. Here's how to harmonize their strategies:
- Encourage open dialogue. Create a space for each developer to present their approach and reasoning.
- Identify shared objectives. Highlight the project's end goals to align their efforts.
- Facilitate compromise. Help them find a middle ground that incorporates the strengths of both strategies.
What strategies have you found effective in resolving team conflicts?
Two developers clash over project approaches. How do you navigate their conflicting strategies?
When developers clash over project approaches, bridging the gap is essential for project continuity. Here's how to harmonize their strategies:
- Encourage open dialogue. Create a space for each developer to present their approach and reasoning.
- Identify shared objectives. Highlight the project's end goals to align their efforts.
- Facilitate compromise. Help them find a middle ground that incorporates the strengths of both strategies.
What strategies have you found effective in resolving team conflicts?
-
These technical disagreements actually push us to grow as a team, even when they're uncomfortable. The healthiest codebases I've seen emerge from constructive friction between different viewpoints. Turning subjective debates into objective discussions is crucial. Having each developer create a proof of concept or document specific technical trade-offs shifts the conversation from personal preferences to measurable outcomes. It's amazing how often this process reveals that both approaches have valid merits. Small experiments are your friend here. Test both strategies on smaller features first instead of betting on one approach.
-
If two developers clash over project approaches, I’d first remind them that the final decision rests with the Project Manager, not individual team members. While their input is valuable, the PM must balance the project’s goals, timeline, and risks. That being said, I would have still need to seek their feedback, along with insights from the Tech Lead and the rest of the team, to ensure all perspectives are considered. After an open discussion about the pros and cons of each approach, I would make a decision that aligns with the project’s objectives. Once the decision is made, it’s crucial for the team to align and move forward together, ensuring success as a unit.
-
Abhishek Maurya(edited)
What a lovely scenario. Hard to see two motivated software developers. If they are convinced about their approaches and company has the budget. Let them do a POC each and let them showcase the results. It is not to prove that one is wrong. It is encourage such behaviour and develop such attitude across the company where people challenge others and let the best solution emerge.
-
This is actually the best thing to happen. It’s like two scientists debating and challenging each other - a white board objective discussion should be encouraged - design discussion with a senior engineer can facilitate debate - finally let them both code and compete for more efficient, maintainable and faster code
-
To resolve conflicts between developers over project strategies, I will facilitate a constructive discussion, encouraging them to share their approaches along with their benefits and drawbacks. I will keep the conversation solution-oriented and respectful, helping them identify common ground or complementary aspects. If consensus isn't reached, I will assess each option's alignment with project goals and choose the most effective approach. This process not only addresses the conflict but also promotes a collaborative mindset for future teamwork.
-
Any project approach will depend on multiple factors. 1. Technical Architecture of the product 2. Design approach 3. Overall objective(Functional aspects) 4. Transaction and data volume 5. Ease of Maintability of the product in future. One should evaluate the criteria with the different approaches and finalize the best feasible approach.
-
When conflicts arise between developers, an open dialogue is the best approach. However, involving key stakeholders is often essential. Developers alone may struggle to reach a decision or have a productive discussion. Stakeholder presence adds valuable perspectives and helps drive the conversation toward a viable solution more quickly. A win-win outcome is crucial to maintain the long-term motivation and engagement of both developers. As a product manager, I’ve resolved many such conflicts, often feeling like a referee—balancing interests, guiding discussions, and ensuring both team goals and individual enthusiasm are preserved.
-
A key feature of a successful team dynamic in an agile environment is a safe and open platform of communication. In this situation it’s imperative to identify the root cause of the two views keeping in mind the projects goals. One of the methods used to identify the root cause is the five why technique to understand the underlying reasons of the conflict. Once the root cause has been established a compromise can be mediated between both parties which involves a hybrid approach that combines elements of both strategies and fosters collaboration and solution driven thinking. Once a compromise has been reached and agreed to it should be included in the projects retrospective meeting to discuss and find ways of preventing this in the future.
-
In summary, below are the steps I have adopted in the past; 1. Acknowledge and understand the conflict. (Root Cause Analysis) 2. Identify common goals and objectives.(Conflict identification) 3. Analyse the conflicting approaches.(Analysis) 4. Facilitate an open discussion. (Collaboration) 5. Explore alternative solutions and compromises. (Resolution) 6. Reach a consensus and define a unified approach.(Way forward) 7. Monitor progress and provide ongoing support.(Monitorind and control) By following these steps, I have helped the developers find common ground and work together towards a successful project outcome.
-
Glad to see that there is some friction. This means at least, people are caring for the project. :) These clashes are good as long as they are not personal. In such cases, the Lead or the Project Manager should brief the team first about the Project goals, targets and timelines. Then co-ordinate a discussion to understand the point of view for all the members. Focus should be to get the "Underlying Intent" behind the statements. The statement is just a language whereas intent is more in-depth. With this open discussion with clear objectives and goals in mind, the frictions can always be resolved.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Content DevelopmentYou're facing conflicting opinions from decision-makers. How can you navigate scope creep effectively?
-
TeamworkYour team is divided on project goals. How do you navigate conflicting priorities effectively?
-
Leadership DevelopmentYour team is divided over project goals. How will you unite them towards a common vision?
-
Team FacilitationYour team is divided on project direction. How do you ensure quality outcomes amidst conflicting opinions?