1.Regular meeting is very important factor. 2. First need to complete 80 % structure to finilize MEP requirements. 3. Need to help them to understand constraints due to MEP requirements in structure. Seating together and understand the solution in every challenging position will always help to get a good product.

To handle conflicting demands between structural and MEP teams, I begin by establishing a shared vision early in the project, ensuring all teams are aligned on goals and understand how their work interconnects 🏗️. I facilitate regular communication through joint meetings, allowing both teams to discuss progress, address concerns, and resolve conflicts promptly 📅. Additionally, I leverage collaborative project management tools to track tasks, deadlines, and dependencies across disciplines 📊. This fosters transparency, improves coordination, and helps maintain a smooth workflow. By promoting collaboration and clear communication, I ensure the successful integration of all team efforts.

Navigating conflicts between structural and MEP teams requires a collaborative and transparent approach. Open communication is key to bringing all stakeholders together to understand each team’s priorities and constraints, which ensures that the final design integrates their needs. Utilizing BIM coordination platforms helps to detect and resolve clashes early, saving time and avoiding costly rework. Ultimately, it’s about finding a balance that aligns with the project’s goals without compromising safety or functionality.

Managing conflicting needs between structural and MEP teams? Keep it simple yet impactful: 1- Unite Around a Vision: Start with a shared goal that inspires collaboration. 2- Talk It Out: Regular meetings = fewer misunderstandings. 3- Visualize Progress: Use smart tools like Primavera to keep everyone on the same page. 4- Resolve Conflicts Wisely: Be the bridge that turns tension into teamwork.