You're navigating conflicting feedback from interviewers. How do you decipher the best path forward?
When interviewers give you conflicting feedback, it's crucial to parse the information wisely. Here's how to find your way:
- Identify common themes. Look for consistent comments across different feedback to pinpoint areas for improvement.
- Evaluate the source. Consider the credibility and relevance of each interviewer's perspective based on their role and expertise.
- Trust your gut. Balance the feedback with your own intuition and career goals to make informed decisions.
How do you handle mixed messages from interviews? Feel free to share your approach.
You're navigating conflicting feedback from interviewers. How do you decipher the best path forward?
When interviewers give you conflicting feedback, it's crucial to parse the information wisely. Here's how to find your way:
- Identify common themes. Look for consistent comments across different feedback to pinpoint areas for improvement.
- Evaluate the source. Consider the credibility and relevance of each interviewer's perspective based on their role and expertise.
- Trust your gut. Balance the feedback with your own intuition and career goals to make informed decisions.
How do you handle mixed messages from interviews? Feel free to share your approach.
-
Receiving feedback during an interview is a gift—not all companies offer this, but it’s something I prioritize as a recruiter. Feedback helps you see how others perceive your skills and approach, which can be a valuable insight. However, remember that not every piece of feedback will align with your personal career goals or the path you envision. Take time to reflect on which points resonate with where you want to go and how you want to grow, and let go of the feedback that doesn’t fit. Ultimately, the best feedback is the kind that moves you closer to your aspirations.
-
Conflicting feedback can be tough, but it's a common challenge. I start by reviewing the feedback objectively, looking for common themes and areas of agreement. Then, I prioritize the feedback based on the interviewer's expertise and the role's key requirements. If there's a significant discrepancy, I may reach out to the interviewers for clarification or to discuss the candidate's strengths and weaknesses. Ultimately, I make a data-driven decision, considering all the information available.
-
Identify common themes in feedback to find areas of agreement Separate subjective opinions from objective qualifications Revisit the job requirements to refocus on key skills and competencies Consider the candidate’s potential for growth and alignment with team values Facilitate a discussion to clarify differing perspectives among interviewers Weigh feedback based on interviewers’ expertise and relevance to the role Make a decision that best supports long-term team and organizational goals
-
Ask interviewers for concrete examples to back their opinions. Focus on the job’s main requirements to weigh feedback. Organize a team discussion to align perspectives. Prioritize consistent feedback over isolated comments. For borderline cases, consider the candidate’s potential to grow. Have a neutral team member interview the candidate.
-
Quando há comentários conflitantes entre os entrevistadores, é crucial revisar as notas e observar padrões nas respostas. Busque entender as razões por trás das avaliações divergentes, considerando aspectos como expectativas, critérios de avaliação e percepções pessoais. Se necessário, agende uma reunião para alinhar os pontos de vista e garantir consenso. Tomar uma decisão informada, equilibrando os diferentes feedbacks, ajuda a selecionar o candidato mais adequado para a vaga.
-
When the interviewer feedback is conflicting, I will go back to the outlier to get the feedback verbally. Sometimes people are not looking for the same thing or they want to clone someone they know. Its important to launch the search with clearly defined criteria. I'll ask if the job spec needs to be revised, do we need to get people together for a debrief discussion, are the right people in the interview process, does the profile they are looking for exist in the market, and is the job correctly leveled? Sometimes there are interviewers that make a sport of not liking anyone so do they need to be involved? It's important to know who has input and who is a decision maker. Lastly but equally important, get the candidate's perspective.
-
When faced with conflicting feedback, I categorize it into two types: actionable and non-actionable. I prioritize feedback that aligns with the role’s core objectives and key skills. I look for common themes and consider the source of the feedback, weighing it against the interviewer’s expertise and perspective. By focusing on constructive, role-specific advice, I can make informed adjustments while respectfully setting aside conflicting input that doesn’t align with the primary goals of the position.
-
In receiving conflicting feedback from interviewers, I start by looking at the role of the interviewer (i.e., potential manager versus a peer/colleague) and then refer to my notes to see where the conflicting feedback is. As each person is different, so are their methods of operating, as well as what s/he values. I try to filter out the more subjective feedback, though it is hard when you do not really know the interviewer. However, there tends to be a theme, and once I am able to figure that out and the respective interviewer’s working style (based on the individual’s feedback), that generally helps me decipher the best path forward. As an example, when an interviewer responds thoroughly versus giving a brief answer, that tells me a lot.
-
"Receiving conflicting feedback after interviews can be daunting, but it's important to tackle the situation with a thoughtful and strategic mindset. Here's I have dealt with." 1) Step Back and Reflect 2) Identify Core Themes 3) Prioritize the Key Feedback 4) Ask Clarifying Questions 5) Be Adaptable 6) Decide on Actionable Steps By maintaining composure, focusing on the most valuable insights, and taking proactive action, you can reshape conflicting feedback into a catalyst for personal growth and achievement.
-
It's through analysis and afterwards checking the most common feedback to work on yourself , also doing personality tests could help.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Research and Development (R&D)What do you do if your R&D achievements and contributions are overlooked in an interview?
-
Career DevelopmentWhat do you do if you want to leave a lasting impression in an interview?
-
InterviewingHow do you maximize interview time and quality?
-
Leadership DevelopmentWhat are some ways to demonstrate strategic thinking in an interview?