You're considering a cost-effective structural solution. How can you ensure its long-term durability?
To guarantee the durability of a cost-effective structural solution, consider these strategies:
How do you approach ensuring the longevity of cost-effective structures? Share your strategies.
You're considering a cost-effective structural solution. How can you ensure its long-term durability?
To guarantee the durability of a cost-effective structural solution, consider these strategies:
How do you approach ensuring the longevity of cost-effective structures? Share your strategies.
-
Accurate loadings, considering as much as possible repetitive sizes of structural elements for repetitive usage of formwork, simplified realistic analysis with proper assumptions followed by appropriate design and detailing, usage of sustainable materials are the main things . However correct design is the key too. Once structure is designed properly for both service limit state and collapse limit state by keeping deflections and cracks within the prescribed limit then structure will be durable causing less maintenance requirement and results into cost effective design. Hence good knowledge and expertise in the structural analysis and design is very very important.
-
Para garantizar la durabilidad de una solución estructural rentable, es fundamental seleccionar materiales de alta calidad que ofrezcan resistencia al desgaste, durabilidad frente a factores ambientales y un buen desempeño a largo plazo, incluso si esto implica un mayor costo inicial. Asimismo, establecer un programa de inspección y mantenimiento periódico permite detectar fallos o deterioros a tiempo, previniendo reparaciones costosas o riesgos estructurales. Por último, incorporar principios de diseño resiliente asegura que la estructura pueda soportar cargas extremas, condiciones adversas y cambios climáticos, prolongando su vida útil sin comprometer la funcionalidad ni la seguridad.
-
Cost effective structural solution can be obtained by ensuring the following important points: 1) Never rely blindly on the design outcomes obtained from the softwares always ensure it to recheck it manually. 2) Avoiding rework i.e. ensuring that the design outcome is accurate enough and not require any rework due to negligence or mistake. 3) Avoiding empirical solutions and thumb rules as both are much conservative as compared to the actual required design outcome. 4) Always keeping ourself updated regarding the latest revisions made in codes and standards. Last but not the least.. 5)Taking suggestions from the experts will definately ensure a cost effective structural solution.
-
From design perspective: Do not rely on the minimum requirements mentioned in the international codes and standards. But we have to invite durability experts to provide the proper set of recommendations that suit with the project geographically location, environmental, usage and specified lifetime as well. Assure to maximize the use of joint less, integrated and statically in-determined structures as well. Make sure to provide safe accesses for replaceable items. Mention on the design drawings the proposed lifetime of replaceable items and maintenance strategy/schedule. However, the above will be useless in the case there is no strong quality control on site during construction phase!
-
As a design engineer, I have always strived to optimise the structural member elements by conducting several rounds of analysis. While it is widely known that software does have optimisation function, some design factors such as frequency of certain part of structure being used and the indirect loading an area supporting are omitted by the feature. Hence, manual repetitive trial to determine the elements plays an advantage. In a construction project, not only the designing phase dictates the cost-effectiveness, the frequency and scale of maintenance of a building could save tons of money as well. Therefore, building materials should be studied thoroughly by sourcing local credible supplier.
-
Displacement-based and performance-based seismic design offer a smart solution for achieving resilience in cost-effective structures. This approach focuses on how a building performs during earthquakes, allowing engineers to optimize the design to meet minimum safety standards or exceed them based on client needs. By selecting an appropriate design drift (lateral movement), engineers can determine a more realistic required strength and ductility. This method optimizes base shear, overturning moments, and detailing, ensuring materials are used efficiently. It also identifies unnecessary lateral-resisting elements, enabling their removal to reduce costs without compromising safety or resilience.
-
To ensure long-term durability in a cost-effective structural solution, choose durable, low-maintenance materials suited to site conditions. Use modeling tools to predict material behavior over time and design with redundancy to handle unforeseen stresses. Implement regular maintenance and monitoring plans to address issues early. Adhere to industry standards to maintain structural integrity over the long term.
-
One of the consideration is factoring in 'Design for Maintainability ' during the design stage. E.g., maintenance access incase of replacement of structural bolts, concrete crack repair works etc.,
-
The answer is in the question. Aiming for durability brings cost-effectiveness over lifecycle. By the time you mobilize a contractor to build something, the cost of durability features are negligible. Also don't confuse durability with overdesign. The devil is in the details and usually around items that have nothing to do with loads but moreso elements that typically wear down a structure such as water, freeze-thaw cycling, corrosion, and overall building envelope. I have addressed enough expensive repairs as a result of inadequate insulation, poor flashing details or poor workmanship. Keep the design simple, and easy to build with locally sourced products, along with stringent QA, reduces the chances of poor workmanship.
-
For a structural solution to be both cost-effective and durable there are many solutions, let me provide two example: - Use of reclaimed structural elements: recent circular economy initiatives allowed for access of reclaimed materials that assure good quality while being very cost effective. - Use of cost effective structural elements and designing simple connections for those elements. For example use of open steel sections instead of closed once, use of simple bolted connections instead of costly welding, etc. While such approach may result in less attractive appearance of a structure, however will be very cost effective and as durable as any alternative solution with similar engineering design quality.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
Structural EngineeringHow can you ensure that a structure is able to accommodate future growth?
-
Construction ManagementHow can you use digital levels for precise elevation measurements?
-
Construction ManagementWhat are the most resilient structural systems for buildings?
-
Construction ManagementHow can you select the right foundation type for a building in cold climates?