Está navegando por complejas discusiones de diseño de software. ¿Cómo se desglosa para las partes interesadas no tecnológicas?

Business needs and pain points are main drivers for any kind of project. There are multiple possible solutions to implement any business idea. In most cases, business stakeholders not interested in technical details of the solution. Key task for solution architect or technology expert is to craft solution which consider clients goals, constrains and risks. And, present it from the point of how it meets business needs and why particular solution was chosen among others with as part of trade off analysis.

A simple way to break down concept of software design is to see it from the user perspective / or perhaps business output. As human are visual creature, another way that can help is by visual illustration such as drawing or diagram / flowchart

To simplify complex software design discussions for non-tech stakeholders, focus on the key benefits and outcomes rather than technical details. Use analogies and relatable examples to explain concepts. Create visual aids like diagrams or flowcharts to illustrate processes. Emphasize how the design meets business goals and user needs, addressing any concerns in straightforward language. Encourage questions and feedback to ensure understanding.

We can simplify complex concepts using BDD (Behavior Driven Development). BDD uses conversations around examples, expressed in a form that can be easily automated. The BDD format is typically: "Given ... when ... then". This approach helps the stakeholder easily understand scenarios written like this.

It is crucial, particularly when working with non-tech stakeholders, to use analogies when explaining software design concepts. For instance, when describing an event-driven architecture, use examples like traffic lights, restaurants, or smartphone notifications as they are easy to understand and help stakeholders appreciate the design.

To simplify concepts for non-tech stakeholders, use plain language and avoid jargon. Break down complex ideas into smaller, manageable parts. Utilize analogies and relatable examples to illustrate technical points. Visual aids like diagrams and charts can help make abstract concepts more concrete. Focus on how the technology impacts their goals and interests, making the discussion relevant and accessible.

I have always found that using visual aids and diagrams is the most effective way to explain concepts to both technical and non-technical stakeholders. As humans, we tend to remember images better than words. Remember, a picture is worth a thousand words. When explaining a design, utilize tools such as flowcharts, mind maps, and use case diagrams - whichever you are comfortable with. However, try to learn each of these as they will be useful in different scenarios.

When using visual aids to simplify software design concepts for non-tech stakeholders, choose clear and straightforward graphics like flowcharts, diagrams, and infographics. Ensure these visuals highlight key points and processes without overwhelming details. Use color coding and labels to differentiate components and show relationships. Incorporate step-by-step illustrations to explain sequences or workflows. Keep the design clean and uncluttered, making it easy to follow and understand.

This is an absolutely crucial aspect of the discussion. Regardless of the complexity or simplicity of the design, the value it brings is paramount. It is imperative to clearly articulate the performance, security, cost savings, competitive advantage, and, most significantly, customer benefits. These factors are intertwined and demand a detailed assessment of their respective pros and cons. No matter what your design is as an architect make sure it is cost effective. These aspects often determine whether your design will be accepted or not.

The stakeholders often overlook the importance of software architecture. Investing time and money in a clean architecture upfront can be costly. However, in the long term, the cost of the maintenance process is reduced. If the program works perfectly but we are not able to change it, we cannot add new features, or make adjustments, then the program will become useless. Prioritizing architecture at the end of the development process can lead to increased costs and time to develop.

To focus on value when simplifying software design concepts for non-tech stakeholders, highlight the benefits and outcomes that the design will bring to the organization. Emphasize how the software will solve specific problems, improve efficiency, or enhance user experience. Relate the design elements directly to business objectives and goals. Use examples and case studies to demonstrate potential positive impacts. Keep the discussion centered on how the design will deliver tangible value and support the stakeholders' priorities.

🔄 If you work iteratively, use the sprint review to showcase your team’s increments and gather feedback from business people or stakeholders. 🗣️ It’s a valuable moment to understand what’s working and what’s not. I take it a step further at the developer level: during the iteration, when I finish a ticket, I record a video demo of it. 🎥 This allows for feedback from teammates and the product owner/manager, who have a keen sense of what’s expected. It’s a great way to adapt even sooner! 🚀

When emphasizing iterative feedback to non-tech stakeholders, explain the process of developing in small, manageable stages and gathering input at each step. Highlight the benefits of continuous feedback, such as ensuring the project stays aligned with their needs and reducing the risk of major issues later on. Show how their ongoing involvement helps refine and improve the design incrementally. Use simple examples to illustrate how early feedback has led to better outcomes in past projects. Stress that their participation is crucial for creating a product that truly meets their requirements.