User talk:Racconish

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


I have signed the confidentiality agreeement on Meta.
You can email me if need be, but I prefer to discuss here.
Should you be interested, older discussions are archived.
☙❧ ❧☙

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Defense (1941)

[edit]

Hi there, Racconish. While trying to find a decent copy of Tanks, a 1942 documentary narrated by Orson Welles, I happened across a better version of a 1941 documentary narrated by Katharine Hepburn, Women in Defense. Could this be uploaded in place of the NARA file, or in addition to it?

And if you ever come across a copy of Tanks, I don't recall ever seeing it mentioned in any of the Welles books I have. Details here. Thanks. — WFinch (talk) 03:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WFinch, File:Women in Defense (1941).webm & File:Tanks (1942).webm. Cheers, — Racconish💬 07:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, you are too good! Thanks and thanks again. — WFinch (talk) 04:09, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before i could upload the George Eastman Museum reconstruction sourced from a YouTube upload, @Yann uploaded the full video file, featuring the opening Criterion/NFPF logos and introduction but without the music score (similar case with File:The Mystic (1925) by Tod Browning.webm).

As we previously discussed, you mentioned me that you believe "the introduction is copyrighted and should be cut out, regardless of any credits in the file description." --Mayimbú (talk) 05:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done — Racconish💬 12:43, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

V2C

[edit]

Hi, Did you see my messages on Commons talk:Video2commons#General failure (and my big report phab:T365154)? Have you had any issue with V2C during the last 2 weeks? Thanks, Yann (talk) 13:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yann, je n'ai pas utilisé récemment V2C et ne puis t'aider sur ce sujet. Je t'ai par ailleurs laisé un message sur la pdd de Jeff G. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 13:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
En revanche, s'il y a des films de YT que tu veux que je téléverse, je suis à ta disposition. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 13:55, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, merci. Je veux bien que tu importes La Cigarette (1919), Foolish Wives (1922), The Three Musketeers (1921). Ces deux derniers sont très longs pour être importés via V2C de toute façon. Quels paramètres utilises-tu pour encoder ? Yann (talk) 14:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ça dépend des formats disponibles sur YT. — Racconish💬 16:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Et pour MPEG4 ? Tu peux aussi importer What Happened to Jones (1926), et Love and Duty (1931) de Bu Wancang, un film chinois dans le domaine public en Chine et aux Etats-Unis. Yann (talk) 18:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
J'ai importé des videos sur IA et YouTube. Sur YT, pour une raison inconnue, certaines ne sont disponibles qu'en 720p alors que je les ai importées en 1080p. Yann (talk) 14:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, je m'en occupe, mais le transcodage prend du temps. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 14:57, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK merci. Pour info : COM:VP#Enabling MP4. Yann (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done — Racconish💬 08:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:West of Hot Dog.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prototyperspective (talk) 21:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion sur le Bistro

[edit]

Bonjour,

Je viens de lancer une discussion sur le bistro de Commons à propos de vos demandes de suppression qui pour certaines me semblent étonnantes, mais je ne sais pas comment notifier un utilisateur sur Commons. Bonne journée Diabolicum (talk) 09:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Film restoration, new copyright?

[edit]

Bonjour, J'ai commencé une discussion sur COM:VPC#Film restoration, new copyright? qui concerne notamment File:One A.M. (1916).webm. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:26, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Encore deux demandes de suppression PD-Italy

[edit]

Bonjour cher Racconish,

Comme déjà arrivé, un contributeur veut supprimer de Commons, deux photo prises en Italie avant 1996 que j'avais versé :

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Marie-Trintignant-Italie-1979.png

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Berger-Gall-Italie-1984.png

Si tu veux bien m'aider à expliquer que le PD-Italy s'applique bien, y compris sur Commons ?

Bien à toi. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 08:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello cher Racconish,
Et désormais, le même contributeur s'attaque aux archives municipales de Toulouse, pourtant officiellement mises en domaine public...
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:PlateauTV-Toulouse-1960.png
Merci de l'aide et très bon week-end à toi. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 12:53, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Racconish,
Désormais, il s'attaque "en masse" aux photos Harcourt :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tisourcier
Si tu peux m'aider avec cette affaire ? Un grand merci. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 07:20, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ce se passe globalement ici, désormais :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Tisourcier
Merci. Tisourcier (talk) 07:44, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Racconish,
Il continue à s'attaquer au PD-Italy. Voir ici :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:StephaneAudran-Italie-1989.jpg
Bien à toi. ;) Tisourcier (talk) 12:31, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, Merci pour l'importation de ce film. Pourrais-tu me dire si importes d'autres films d'après mon compte IA, pour que je ne le fasse pas en double ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:19, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pas actuellement, non. Je fais attention à ces aspects et si tu veilles à catégoriser les films, il ne devrait pas y avoir de problème. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 09:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1080p versions of old films

[edit]

Hi, I don't know if you follow that page, so FYI: Commons:Graphic Lab/Video and sound workshop#Import 1080p versions. Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the same subject, regarding the discussion archived to User talk:Jeff G./Archives/2024/July#1080p versions of old films, please don't think that I have forgotten about attempting to fix the issue for you and Yann. The latest research is documented off-wiki at https://github.com/toolforge/video2commons/issues/210 (I am still getting 153 errors for Dixiana and two silent versions).   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On June 2020, @Koavf overwrote your file with an HD version sourced from the Library of Congress page. Despite it's superior quality, that version has missing several seconds of footage from the original upload for which the incomplete english subtitles are out of sync (no the case with the, still unfinished, French and Croatian subtitles which correspond to the current upload).

I suggest to revert the current upload to the original file (or an Higher Quality version of the same file if possible), upload the LOC version as a separate file, request a completion for the English subtitles and move the unfinished French and Croatian subtitles to the new file.--Mayimbú (talk) 19:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is the correct solution as well. Do you need me to do it? —Justin (koavf)TCM 21:33, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will upload the IA version on top of the current one. Justin please revert yours (and the related subtitles) and upload it separately. Thanks, — Racconish💬 06:47, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Fontana Io sono un santo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 13:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found a movie in better quality and without unsightly subtitles - [1]. Would it be possible to upload it? 37.47.177.168 11:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gyurkovicsarna (1920).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

hinnk (talk) 05:17, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Har jeg Ret til at tage mit eget Liv (1920).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

hinnk (talk) 04:29, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please delete the first version of the file that had the soundtrack? Back then I forgot to unmute the audio then (which unfortunately happened to me a few times). And I would like someone to remove the audio, which I know you are doing. OGPawlis (talk) 12:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done — Racconish💬 14:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:The Man with the Golden Arm (1955) .webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

hinnk (talk) 02:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Eyes Of The Mummy (1918).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

hinnk (talk) 05:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 19:10, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Racconish,
Il recommence ! Bien que lors des débats, aucun motif réel et sérieux n'a été établi de leur part, ils décident de lancer une suppression de masse de toutes les photos Studio Harcourt. Cela relève désormais de la désorganisation et d'une démarche particulièrement destructrice. Nous avons pourtant fourni les données, références et éléments démontrant que ces fichiers sont réellement libres de droits. Merci de ton aide. Tisourcier (talk) 10:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:A Plantation Act (1926, technicolor version).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ConcededBear657 (talk) 07:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 14:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salut, As-tu une opinion à propos de cette demande de suppression ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:04, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: , j'ai longtemps cru que l'argument de l'URAA n'était pas suffisant à soi seul mais il me semble que le consensus communautaire a évolué sur ce point. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 23:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Les images affected par l'URAA sont supprimées, et cela est le cas depuis 2012. La question est, à qui incombe la charge de la preuve ? Je ne conteste pas la suppression quand la preuve est apportée. Dans le cas des images Harcourt, non seulement il n'y a aucune preuve, mais il y a une volonté de supprimer ces images en masse, y compris avec des dates fantaisistes. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, Racconish. I just happened across a superlative version of this Army Pictorial Service film that you uploaded at the National Archives: here. The National Archives has also uploaded this version at YouTube per this blog entry.

The blog also refers to a related 1944 War Department documentary about World War I veterans rehabilitation, titled Meet McGonegal. An outstanding copy of that film is also at the National Archives, here. Thanks again for your work here. — WFinch (talk) 03:06, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@WFinch: ✓ Done the 1st and the 2nd is here Clin. — Racconish💬 22:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just look at that — outstanding. Thanks a lot. — WFinch (talk) 20:49, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, RoyZuo (talk) 09:41, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File recovery

[edit]

Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Slava_Mogutin_and_Robert_Filippini.jpg

Hello. The User:Sealle who put this file up for deletion is banned from Wikipedia for multiple violations. On the other hand, en:Slava Mogutin is a very famous person. His official site can be considered an authoritative source. I'd like you to consider reassigning the file. Воскресенский Петр (talk) 17:27, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Воскресенский Петр, it has been too long. Please take your request to Commons:Undeletion requests. Thanks, — Racconish💬 18:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I founded a copy higher quality. Can you upload? 2001:871:25A:B39E:8173:6553:9986:1389 22:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Cocoanuts trailer (1929).webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SnowyCinema (talk) 01:59, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]