Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requested articles/Philosophy

< Wikipedia:Requested articles
Add your request in the most appropriate place below.

Before adding a request please:

Editors wishing to focus on philosophy articles may find the philosophy WikiProject useful.

Also, when adding a request, please include as much information as possible (such as webpages, articles, or other reference material) so editors can find and distinguish your request from an already-created article.

WikiProject
Philosophy

article · category · portal

 · Join the project
 · Main Φ discussion w
 · Categories
 · Style guide
 · Article alerts
 · New articles
 · Articles for deletion
 · RFC
 · Requested articles
 · Reference desk
 · Featured content
 · Star of Sophia
 · Reference resources
Task forces
Philosophers log join
Literature log join
Aesthetics log join
Epistemology log join
Ethics log join
Logic log join
Metaphysics log join
Social and political log join
Language log join
Mind log join
Religion log join
Science log join
Analytic log join
Continental log join
Eastern log join
Ancient log join
Medieval log join
Modern log join
Contemporary log join
Assessment
 · Project banner
 · Statistics
 · Articles needing attention
 · Peer review
Articles by quality
 · FA 44
 · FL 5
 · GA 192
 · B 1385
 · C 4031
 · Start 7373
 · Stub 4595
 · Unassessed 51
Articles by importance
 · Top 20
 · High 932
 · Mid 3051
 · Low 14309
 · Unknown 109
Article lists
 · Philosophers
 · Philosophical literature
 · Aesthetics
 · Ethics
 · Epistemology
 · Logic
 · Metaphysics
 · Soc+Pol
 · Philosophy of language
 · Philosophy of mind
 · Philosophy of religion
 · Philosophy of science
 · Analytic philosophy
 · Continental philosophy
 · Eastern philosophy
 · Ancient Philosophy
 · Medieval philosophy
 · Modern philosophy
 · Contemporary philosophy
Popular pages
Philosophers
Literature
Aesthetics
Epistemology
Ethics
Logic
Metaphysics
Social and political
Language
Mind
Religion
Science
Analytic
Continental
Eastern
Ancient
Medieval
Modern
Contemporary
Indices
 · Philosophers
 · Literature
 · Aesthetics
 · Epistemology
 · Ethics
 · Logic
 · Metaphysics
 · Social and political
 · Language
 · Mind
 · Religion
 · Science
 · Analytic
 · Continental
 · Eastern
 · Ancient
 · Medieval
 · Modern
 · Contemporary
Templates
General
 · {{WikiProject Philosophy}}
 · {{Philosophy topics}}
 · {{Infobox philosopher}}
 · {{PhilCOTW}}
 · {{PhilosophyTasks}}
 · {{PhilosophyTasksBox}}
 · {{PhilInvit}}
Navigation
 · {{Aesthetics}}
 · {{Epistemology}}
 · {{Ethics}}
 · {{Logic}}
 · {{Metaphysics}}
 · {{Social and political philosophy}}
 · {{Philosophy of language}}
 · {{Philosophy of mind}}
 · {{Philosophy of religion}}
 · {{Philosophy of science}}
 · {{Analytic philosophy}}
 · {{Continental philosophy}}
Stubs
 · {{Philo-stub}}
 · {{Philosopher-stub}}
 · {{Philo-book-stub}}
 · {{Hindu-philo-stub}}
 · {{Philos-novel-stub}}
 · {{ethics-stub}}
 · {{logic-stub}}
Userboxes
 · {{User WP Philosophy}}
 · {{User WP Philosophers}}
 · {{User WP Philosophical lit}}
 · {{User WP Aesthetics}}
 · {{User WP Epistemology}}
 · {{User WP Ethics}}
 · {{User WP Logic}}
 · {{User WP Metaphysics}}
 · {{User WP Soc+Pol Phil}}
 · {{User WP Continental Philosophy}}
 · {{User WP Analytic Philosophy}}
 · {{User WP Eastern Phil}}
 · {{User WP Ancient Phil}}
 · {{User WP Medieval Phil}}
 · {{User WP Modern Phil}}
 · {{User WP Contemporary Phil}}
 · {{User WP Phil of religion}}
 · {{User WP Phil of mind}}
 · {{User WP Phil of science}}
 · {{User WP Phil of language}}
Related WikiProjects
 · Alternative views talk
 · Arts talk
 · Atheism talk
 · Biblical criticism talk
 · Biography (academians) talk
 · Hindu Philosophy talk
 · History of Science talk
 · History talk
 · Islamic philosophy talk
 · Linguistics talk
 · Literature talk
 · Mathematics talk
 · Middle ages talk
 · Mythology talk
 · Physics talk
 · Skepticism talk
 · Religion talk
 · Science talk
 · Spirituality talk
Reference resources
 · PhilPapers
 · Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
 · Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
 · Indiana Philosophy Ontology Project
 · Perseus Digital Library

IEP most wanted

edit

Article titles from the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy's 100 Most Desired Articles list that do not yet exist on Wikipedia:

Aesthetics

edit

Epistemology

edit

Ethics

edit

Moral Truths

History

edit

Logic

edit

Philosophical logic

edit

Request article of 'Implicit Premises, also apparently refered to as Suppressed Premises' Which is arguments/syllogisms based on presupposed premises not mentioned.

  • Appeal to classical allusions
  • Asserting an alternative
  • Axiometry Nathan Coppedge's systematic method of parsing categories, often using opposites. Important precedents for the method are Hegel's category square, Venn Diagrams, literary analogies, Novalis' category distinctions from Notes for a Romantic Encyclopaedia, and Sheldon's dialectic of opposites. The method also has an important basis in Kant's categorical imperative, and Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Coppedge occurs in a position that is reacting against the linguistic turn, but also embracing it. Earlier thinkers failed to truly realize that math and language could co-exist. In one of Coppedge's projects he calls this 'the qualific science'. His view is that properties that do not have qualities are irrational, because they cannot be perceived. Coppedge's categorical deduction method, radically different from syllogisms, is the primary example of the method. Axiometry is not to be confused with Axonometric projection or Axiology), which are both very different
  • B. R. A. I. N. Information gathering technique for informed decision making primarily in childbirth, acronym of Benefits, Risks, Alternatives, Intuition, Need Time. Or B. R. A. I. N. E. D. Benefits, Risks, Alternatives, Intuition, Nothing, Evaluate, Decide.
  • Categorical Deduction Introduced by Nathan Coppedge in 2013, it bears some resemblance to a truth table, but is meant to be interpreted coherently. It is as opposed to earlier forms such as Categorical syllogism, Categorical imperative, and standard Analogy. The method is unconventional in that it uses a bounded Cartesian coordinate system, reading circularly and linearly. In a quadra format it takes the form of four opposite categories (two polar opposite pairs) arranged in the strict form AB:CD and AD:CB (this can also be expressed as 'AB-CD and AD-CB' or 'A-B :: C-D and A-D :: C-B). The system can be used to bridge knowledge gaps and solve difficult problems.
  • Causal lever(s) technical term (or term-of-art) commonly used in philosophical discourse to indicate that the explanation of the mechanism that lead to the result (or considerations in a thought experiment) depend heavily on purely contingent facts (not necessary facts); that is, the explanation (or consideration) is historical or, more importantly, based on CONTINGENCY and is not purely nomological (law-based); potentially there could be several if-then's (the causal levers) THAT COULD HAVE BEEN OTHERWISE that comprise the bulk of the explanation (along with principles [usually so obvious that they're not important to discuss] about how the world works); a common phrase (clause) one may find is "... if the causal levers were such that ..."
  • Coherent Logic Nathan Larkin Coppedge introduces primarily diagrammatic methods and means of deductions as a way of objectifying knowledge and standardizing correspondence with other types of systems. Paraphrased Source: The Dimensional Philosopher's Toolkit (CreateSpace Independent Publishing, 2014).
  • Common thread reasoning
  • Conjunctive forks
  • Converting a conditional
  • Doctrine of Unexpected Consequences
  • Double-paradox Nathan Coppedge defines a paroxysm as a double-paradox, a paradox used as a solution to a paradox. This requires reversing all the terms, but also requires that the initial terms form a sufficient definition of a paradoxical problem. See Coppedge describes it in a paper called Paroxysm Solution to All Paradoxes. "Paroxysm" is also the name of a book of interviews with the French philosopher Jean Baudrillard (Verso, 1998), which may have inspired Coppedge's new definition
  • Equivocity
    • Perhaps what is meant is amphiboly
    • Add to wiktionary quality or state of equivocation
  • Exponential knowledge The method of Categorical Deduction popularized at knowledge-oriented websites in 2013 by Nathan Coppedge proposes a solution to the problems of Information based complexity known as the curse of dimensionality common in disciplines such as Economics and Mathematics. The paradox of the curse of dimensionality: Coppedge proposes that exponential knowledge has the opposite effect of complexity, which he terms "perfection," with the implication that it may ironically be perfection and not complexity which creates information overload.
  • Fallacy of biased generalization
  • Fallacies of distraction
  • Fallacies of explanation
  • Fallacy of personal preference assumptions
  • Fallacy of quantificational logic
  • Fallacy of reverse causation
  • Fallacy of the alternative syllogism
  • Fallacy of the disjunctive syllogism
  • Fallacy of the propositional logic
  • Feature logic May describe grammatic and syntactic choice in natural language.
  • Free time (fallacy)
  • Futurist extrapolation
G-O
P-Z

Mathematical logic

edit

Metaphysics

edit

request new article on "scientific atheism"

Not all atheists are empirical atheists. Some accept axiomatic foundations (see: axiomatic system, axiomatization of physics, relation between mathematics and physics [physics needs a program-like axiomatization; infinite logical systems are possible, not only mathematics], see also: constructor theory). Some atheists accept the proof by contradiction, etc.

see: methods of proof (see academic documents on all possible methods of proof).

Not all methods of proof are formal. But those who have rigorous logical foundations are used by atheists who debunk the personhooded self-axiomatization, teleology and religious cosmogony. Logical monism is wrong (see: experimental logical foundations [alternative logical foundations don't have to be useful, experimental axiomatic systems, etc.]. Pluralistic physicalism has many arguments: separation of personhood per brain, Everettism = many-worlds interpretation, logical, axiomatic and cosmological pluralism, etc.

Not all atheists have the exact same views. Atheist popularizers like many new atheists, attack religion with merged forces but usually avoid to elaborate to the different atheistic movements.

Antimetaphysics

edit

The view of the world of the antimetaphysical. An atheist might believe in magical thinking, or non analytical theories that don't imply the scientificmethod. An antimetaphysical is always an atheist but an atheist is not always antimetaphysical. An antimetaphysical[1] cannot be agnostic, for agnostics are or may be open to metaphysics.

Journals

edit
See Wikipedia:Requested articles/Philosophy/Journals

People

edit

Other

edit
Requests listed in this section may belong somewhere else. Please help by moving them to a suitable location.

A

edit

After Life: the books of Anthony Borgia; Life in the world Unseen, 1954; More About Life in the World Unseen, 1956; Here and Hereafter, 1959.

B

edit

C

edit
  • I know of this biased, poorly-written site. It is an ancient symbol from Le Dragon Rouge tome associated with magic. It's also the topic of numerous opera/black metal bands. Apart from that, I can't find anything, least of all a reputable source.

D

edit

E

edit

F

edit

G

edit

H

edit

I

edit

J

edit

K

edit

L

edit

M

edit

N

edit

O

edit

P

edit

* Pro-choice feminism

Q

edit

R

edit

S

edit

T

edit

U

edit

V

edit

W

edit

Y

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/antimetaphysical
  2. ^ http://www.dristantobad.fineartsbd.com/
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Philosophy&oldid=1264476357"