Wikipedia

United Shoe Machinery Corporation

This article is about a former US-based corporation. For the British company of the same name, see British United Shoe Machinery. For other uses, see USMC (disambiguation).

United Shoe Machinery Corporation (USMC) was a U.S.-based manufacturer of various industrial machinery, particularly for the shoe manufacturing industry and monopolized the American shoe machinery business.[1] It was an important federal government's defense contractor during the World War I, Interbellum years, World War II and the Cold war era, which developed and manufactured various land and aircraft armaments, as well as components for the military hardware made by other manufacturers. Founded in Beverly, Massachusetts, its corporate headquarters were eventually relocated to Boston, with key production facilities scattered around Massachusetts. It had subsidiaries in other countries including British United Shoe Machinery in England.

A vintage postcard with the United Shoe Machinery factory in Beverly, Massachusetts
Share of the United Shoe Machinery Corporation, issued 4. May 1916

History

edit

The Smithsonian National Museum of American History provides the following account of the history of the United Shoe Machinery Corporation.

The United Shoe Machinery Company was formed in 1899 by the consolidation of three shoe machinery firms in the industry: Goodyear Shoe Machinery Company; Consolidated McKay Lasting Machine Company; and McKay Shoe Machinery Company. The new company continued the practice previously followed by its constituent firms of renting machinery that it manufactured instead of selling it. After the 1899 merger, United grew quite rapidly. In 1903, it began construction of a new factory in Beverly, Massachusetts about thirty-five miles from Boston. At its peak, this company employed 9,000 workers and produced eighty-five percent of all shoemaking machines in the United States. By 1910, it had an eighty percent share of the shoe machinery market with assets reaching forty million dollars, and it had acquired control of branch companies in foreign countries. In 1917, the United Shoe Machinery Corporation, incorporated in 1905, absorbed the United Shoe Machinery Company. The United Shoe Machinery Corporation had its headquarters in Boston and its main manufacturing plant in Beverly, Massachusetts. In 1968, the United Shoe Machinery Corporation changed its name to USM Corporation. In 1976, United Shoe Machinery Company merged with Emhart Industries and produced the modern-day Emhart Corporation. In 1989, in order to resist a two billion dollar takeover attempt by a New York investment group (which included oil heir Gordon P. Getty), Emhart merged with Black & Decker Corporation. The merged company operates from Black & Decker's headquarters in Towson, Maryland. The company headquarters in Farmington, Connecticut, were closed in June 1989.[2]

Since its founding, the United Shoe Machinery Company was embroiled in legal disputes and controversial business practices.[3][4][5][6][7] By 1916, the factory sent out 24,000 machines per year. Unusually for its time, the company leased out its shoe manufacturing equipment, rather than selling it. A boot factory could use 50 different machines to stay competitive. The Bewerly(sic) site had food halls seating 700 employees, break rooms, leasure facilities, apprenticeship and a hospital. The company designed, built and tested the machines, and then disassembled them and sent them to customer factories.[8]

In December 1947 the US government brought proceedings against USM alleging a breach of the Sherman Antitrust Act in that the company had been a monopoly since 1912.[9] A "trial of prodigious length" followed, with the verdict going against USM, but the corporation wasn't broken up and the judgement and remedy was confirmed by the Supreme Court in 1954.

The government renewed its complaint in 1967 but although the District Court ruled nothing had changed, this time the Supreme Court ordered USM to be broken up. It was required to divest a substantial part of its business and change its leasing strategy over a 10-year period, with the sell-off raising $400 million. It continued to innovate within the shoe manufacturing industry, but it also developed such modern inventions as the hot glue gun, the soda can pop-top, the drive mechanism for the Lunar Roving, and pop rivets for the Concorde.[9] However, the attempts at diversification failed to generate enough money and in 1976 the company, heavily in debt, was bought by Emhart Corporation, now Stanley Engineered Fastening,[10] an organisation half its size.[11]

In 1987 a management buyout led by the management of British United Shoe Machinery (BUSM) bought the shoe machinery operations, including USM, from Emhart Industries and control of USM then passed to the U.K. as part of the newly created United Machinery Group (UMG).[12] Subsequently, the USM headquarters moved into a new high-tech factory outside Boston. In 1995 UMG was acquired by Venture Capitalists Apax Partners Corporate Finance Limited,[13] but after financial difficulties UMG went into administration in 2000.

The anti-trust case against the United Shoe Machinery Company have drawn comparisons to subsequent anti-trust cases against IBM[14][15] and Microsoft.[16]

Research and development

edit

The corporation pioneered the development and production of a synthetic leather materials.[17]

During the Interbellum era corporate Research Division designed and developed gun mounts, gun turrets, fire control equipment, automatic guns, automatic fuse setting, bomb release equipment, automatic conveying equipment, and automatic rocket projectors, as well as many other things of military interest.[18]

During the postwar years, the corporate engineers experimented intensively with armoured fighting vehicles of modular design, kindred by common chassis, common armor elements, interchangeable armament, automatic loading for weapons, and low weight in order to attain high speeds, coupled with various comfort add-ons provided for the housed crew.[19]

Production items

edit
Armoured fighting vehicles
  • T54E1 medium tank
  • Turtle-series, IVI prototype gun motor carriages (33 tons, tracked, turreted, 4-man crew situated below the upper hull line, 600-hp engine, armor thickness 3 to 61⁄2 inches, dimensions: 18'7" long, 9'4" wide, 7' tall, carrying various promptly interchangeable turrets, different main armament with automatic feed system; plus twin 30 mm driver's coaxial machine gun, one .30 caliber commander's machinegun, and one .50 caliber AA machinegun each; weapon stabilization in addition to driver stabilization, internal air cleaning and air conditioning systems)[19]
  • IVI Gun Motor Carriage, quadruple .50 caliber machine gun (main)[19]
  • IVI-C Gun Motor Carriage, twin 37 mm guns[20]
  • IVI-D Gun Motor Carriage, single-barrel 75 mm tank gun (gunner's compartment separated from the crew compartment, allowing the gunner to move with the weapon in elevation and in azimuth)[20]
Gun turrets and armament
  • tank turrets
  • T20E1 (Fisher Body Div. of General Motors)[21] Medium Tank turret mounting the 76 mm M1 gun with an autoloader[22]
  • T22E1 (Chrysler's DTA)[23] Medium Tank turret mounting the 75 mm M3 gun equipped with an autoloader[22]
  • T77 Gun Motor Carriage multibarrel .50 caliber machine gun mount T89[24]
  • High Speed Harmonic Drive Speed Reducer for slow and stabilized rotation of shipboard or tank heavy gun turrets
  • 37 mm tank gun M5[25]
 
T54E1 medium tank, designed and constructed by the United Shoe
T20-series of tanks carried a gun turret, developed by the corporation
T77 gun motor carriage housed T89 multibarreled gun mount
37 mm tank gun M5 installed at a turret of M5A1 light tank
Infantry weapons and artillery pieces
 
M3 antitank gun and carriage, both manufactured by the United Shoe
Weapon systems
 
B-17 Flying Fortress ball turret developed together with Lockheed Aircraft
 
XSB2A Buccaneer featured a power turret developed together with W. L. Maxson Corp.
 
YA-14 Shrike and XP-71 were to have pressurized turrets with twin 37 mm cannons, similar to those developed by Bell Aircraft
 
XB-40 and XB-41 featured a power-operated M5 waist gun mounts
 
Several thousand corporate employees, the entire workforce gathered at a greenlawn in front of the factory buildings for a group photo, 1911
Aerospace equipment
Industrial machinery
  • electronic component assembly machines
  • automatic assembly machines for assembling military radar sets

Structure

edit

The corporation had several divisions, subsidiaries and affiliates, which were located mainly in Massachusetts.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ United Shoe Machinery Co., Information: A Monthly Digest of Current Events and World Progress Covering Jan. 1915 – May 1917, v. 3, p. 307.
  2. ^ United Shoe Machinery Corporation Records, 1898–1987 by Smithsonian National Museum of American History
  3. ^ Roe, Richard (1913). "The United Shoe Machinery Company". Journal of Political Economy. 21 (10): 938–953. doi:10.1086/252358. ISSN 0022-3808.
  4. ^ Roe, Richard (1914). "The United Shoe Machinery Company". Journal of Political Economy. 22 (1): 43–63. doi:10.1086/252374. ISSN 0022-3808.
  5. ^ "SUSPEND ANTI-TRUST ORDER; Court Grants Leeway to United Shoe Machinery Company". The New York Times. 1915-12-21. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2024-07-27.
  6. ^ Blair, Roger D.; Herndon, Jill Boylston (2000). "United Shoe Machinery and the Antitrust Significance of "Free" Service". Review of Industrial Organization. 17 (3): 301–311. ISSN 0889-938X.
  7. ^ Masten, Scott E.; Snyder, Edward A. (1993). "United States versus United Shoe Machinery Corporation: On the Merits". The Journal of Law & Economics. 36 (1): 33–70. ISSN 0022-2186.
  8. ^ Arnesen, E. F. (1916). "A premier American factory". danmarkshistorien.ing.dk (in Danish). Ingeniøren / Norsk Tidsskrift for Haandverk og Industri. p. 149—152. ..maintains its market by a special lease system for its machines. This factory mainly does not sell its machines, but leases them to shoe manufacturers for an annual payment, or payment related to shoe production.
  9. ^ a b "United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corporation, District Ct. of the U.S., District of Mass., 1949–1952 Finding Aid". Harvard Law School. July 2004. Archived from the original on 10 December 2012. Retrieved 8 July 2020.
  10. ^ "The STANLEY Engineered Fastening Group - STANLEY® Engineered Fastening".
  11. ^ Howie 1999, p. 99
  12. ^ Howie, Iain (1999). USM Serving the Shoemaker for 100 years. Shoe Trades Publishing. p. 115. ISBN 0-9536531-0-2.
  13. ^ Howie 1999, p. 125
  14. ^ Smith, William D. (1975-05-18). "Curtain Time for the I. B. M. Case". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2024-07-27.
  15. ^ Smith, William D. (1972-02-13). "How Big Is Too Big?; Size of I.B. M. Raises Problems For Trust Busters". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2024-07-27.
  16. ^ Harmon, Amy (2001-06-29). "U.S. VS. MICROSOFT: THE REMEDY; Some Possible Carrots and Sticks". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2024-07-27.
  17. ^ Ward, A. G. Substitutes for Leather, New Scientist, 5 September 1963, no. 355, p. 502.
  18. ^ His Brogue Livens Field Test of Gun, The Exponent, January 1949, v. 61, no. 1, p. 29.
  19. ^ a b c Icks 1965, p. 26.
  20. ^ a b Icks 1965, pp. 26–27.
  21. ^ Hunnicutt 1996, p. 52.
  22. ^ a b Hunnicutt 1996, p. 68.
  23. ^ Hunnicutt 1996, p. 62.
  24. ^ Hunnicutt 1992, p. 348.
  25. ^ a b United Shoe Builds Guns For and Against Tanks, Iron Age, October 30, 1941, v. 148, no. 18, p. 95.
  26. ^ Thomson & Mayo 1960, pp. 81, 87.
  27. ^ Thomson & Mayo 1960, p. 81.
  28. ^ a b Contracts, Iron Age, October 9, 1941, v. 148, no. 15, p. 95.
  29. ^ Veronico 2014, p. 13.
  30. ^ Holley, Irving B. Development of Aircraft Turrets in the AAF, 1917–1944, Defense Technical Information Center, 1947, p. 128.
  31. ^ Veronico 2014, p. 15.
  32. ^ Veronico 2014, p. 14.

Books

edit
edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Shoe_Machinery_Corporation&oldid=1261900012"