Talk:Lebrunia coralligens

A fact from Lebrunia coralligens appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 April 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the tissues of the hidden anemone contain symbiotic single-celled algae?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lebrunia coralligens.

Wikipedia

Animals Low‑importance

Lebrunia coralligens is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

Marine life (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marine life, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Marine lifeWikipedia:WikiProject Marine lifeTemplate:WikiProject Marine lifeMarine life

Tagged with "expert needed"?

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Could the editor responsible for the tagging please leave some indication of what he thinks the problems are with this article? Without that, it is hard to know how to go about fixing it. Invertzoo (talk) 14:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Maybe it is because I am not a sea anemone expert, but on a second and third examination, I can't see what is wrong with this article, even when comparing the content points with the text in the references. If I can't get any feedback from the editor who tagged the article, I may remove the tag as inappropriate. Thanks for any insight on this. Invertzoo (talk) 00:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic