skip to main content
article

Coverage-aware connectivity-constrained unattended sensor deployment in underwater acoustic sensor networks

Published: 10 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Careful deployment of nodes in underwater acoustic sensor networks in a distributed manner with the goal of maximized coverage and guaranteed connectivity is a challenging problem because it is very difficult and costly to access the 3D underwater environment. This paper presents a novel algorithm for self-deployment of nodes in underwater acoustic sensor networks assuming that the nodes are randomly dropped to the water surface and form a densely populated connected network at the water surface. The idea of the algorithm is based on calculating an optimized depth for each node in the network in such a way that the possible sensing coverage overlaps are minimized and the connectivity of final topology is guaranteed. The algorithm has three main phases. In the first phase, nodes are organized in a tree structure that is rooted at the surface station. In the second phase, the depths for all nodes are computed iteratively at surface station. In the final phase, the calculated depths are distributed to nodes so that the nodes start sinking. The performance of the proposed approach is validated through simulation. We observed that the proposed approach performs at least 10% better in terms of network coverage than contemporary schemes in the literature. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

References

[1]
Ge X, Cheng H, Guizani M, Han T. 5G wireless backhaul networks: challenges and research advances. IEEE Network 2014; Volume 28 Issue 6: pp.6-11.
[2]
Ge X, Yang B, Ye J, Mao G, Wang C-X, Han T. Spatial spectrum and energy efficiency of random cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Communications 2015; Volume 63 Issue 3: pp.1019-1030.
[3]
Akyildiz IF, Pompili D, Melodia T. Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks 2005; Volume 3: pp.257-279.
[4]
Sozer E, Stojanovic M, Proakis J. Underwater acoustic networks. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 2000; Volume 25: pp.72-83.
[5]
Heidemann J, Ye W, Wills J, Syed A, Li Y. Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking. In IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference WCNC'06, Las Vegas, Nevada, April 2006.
[6]
Khan FA, Khan S, Turgut D, Bölöni L. Greedy path planning for maximizing value of information in underwater sensor networks. In IEEE P2MNET'14, Edmdonton, Canada, 2014; pp.39-44.
[7]
Basagni S, Bölöni L, Gjanci P, Petrioli C, Phillips CA, Turgut D. Maximizing the value of sensed information in underwater wireless sensor networks via an autonomous underwater vehicle. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'14, Toronto, Canada, 2014; pp.988-996.
[8]
Bölöni L, Turgut D, Basagni S, Petrioli C. Scheduling data transmissions of underwater sensor nodes for maximizing value of information. In Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM'13, Atlanta, GA, USA, 2013; pp.460-465.
[9]
Senel F, Akkaya K, Yilmaz T. Autonomous deployment of sensors for maximized coverage and guaranteed connectivity in underwater acoustic sensor networks. In IEEE 38th Conference on Local Computer Networks LCN, Sydney, Australia, 2013.
[10]
Senel F, Akkaya K, Erol-Kantarci M, Yilmaz T. Self-deployment of mobile underwater acoustic sensor networks for maximized coverage and guaranteed connectivity. Ad Hoc Networks 2015; Volume 34: pp.170-183.
[11]
Akkaya K, Newell A. Self-deployment of sensors for maximized coverage in underwater acoustic sensor networks. Computer Communications May 2009; Volume 32 Issue 7-10: pp.1233-1244.
[12]
Bettstetter C. On the connectivity of ad hoc networks. The Computer Journal 2004; Volume 47 Issue 4: pp.432-447.
[13]
Han G, Jiang J, Sun N, Shu L. Secure communication for underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 2015; Volume 53 Issue 8: pp.54-60.
[14]
Han G, Jiang J, Shu L, Guizani M. An attack-resistant trust model based on multidimensional trust metrics in underwater acoustic sensor network. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 2015; Volume 14 Issue 12: pp.2447-2459.
[15]
Han G, Zhang C, Shu L, Sun N, Li Q. A survey on deployment algorithms in underwater acoustic sensor networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 2013; Volume 2013. "http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijdsn/ 2013/314049/cta/".
[16]
Ravelomanana V. Extremal properties of three-dimensional sensor networks with applications. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 2004; Volume 3: pp.246-257.
[17]
Han G, Zhang C, Shu L, Rodrigues J. Impacts of deployment strategies on localization performance in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 2015; Volume 62 Issue 3: pp.1725-1733.
[18]
Pompili D, Melodia T, Akyildiz IF. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional deployment analysis for underwater acoustic sensor networks. Ad Hoc Networks 2009; Volume 7 Issue 4: pp.778-790.
[19]
Cayirci E, Tezcan H, Dogan Y, Coskun V. Wireless sensor networks for underwater survelliance systems. Ad Hoc Networks 2006; Volume 4 Issue 4: pp.431-446.
[20]
Liu B, Ren F, Lin C, Yang Y, Zeng R, Wen H. 2008. The redeployment issue in underwater sensor networks. In IEEE Globecom 2008. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference IEEE, New Orleans, LO; pp.1-6.
[21]
Alam SN, Haas Z. 2006. Coverage and connectivity in three-dimensional networks. In Proceeding of ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking MOBICOM'06 ACM, Los Angeles, CA; pp.346-357.
[22]
Poduri S, Pattem S, Krishnamachari B, Sukhatme GS. Sensor network configuration and the curse of dimensionality. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors, Cambridge, MA, May 2006.
[23]
Alam SMN, Haas ZJ. Coverage and connectivity in three-dimensional networks with random node deployment. Ad Hoc Networks 2015; Volume 34: pp.157-169. 10.1016/j.adhoc.2014.09.008.
[24]
Detweiler C, Doniec M, Vasilescu I, Basha E, Rus D. Autonomous depth adjustment for underwater sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM International Workshop on Underwater Networks WUWNet '10, New York, NY, USA, 2010.
[25]
for Underwater Ultrasonic Sensor. "http://www.st4u.com/eng/ultrasonic-sensor-under-water.html" {Accessed on February 02, 2016}.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)HEPSO: an efficient sensor node redeployment strategy based on hybrid optimization algorithm in UWASNWireless Networks10.1007/s11276-021-02584-427:4(2365-2381)Online publication date: 1-May-2021
  1. Coverage-aware connectivity-constrained unattended sensor deployment in underwater acoustic sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing
    Wireless Communications & Mobile Computing  Volume 16, Issue 14
    October 2016
    272 pages

    Publisher

    John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    United Kingdom

    Publication History

    Published: 10 October 2016

    Author Tags

    1. connectivity
    2. coverage maximization
    3. self node deployment
    4. underwater acoustic sensor networks

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)HEPSO: an efficient sensor node redeployment strategy based on hybrid optimization algorithm in UWASNWireless Networks10.1007/s11276-021-02584-427:4(2365-2381)Online publication date: 1-May-2021

    View Options

    View options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media