Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 June 18

< June 17	June 19 >

June 18

File:Personal Kemetic shrine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:02, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

possible derivative of non-free content (photograph) FASTILY 01:49, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Schoharie limousine crash memorial rendering.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free rendering of a memorial is used to illustrate a minor part of the Schoharie limousine crash article. It's removal would not adversely affect a reader's understanding of the topic which is the crash. Fails WP:NFCC#8 Whpq (talk) 19:22, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It accompanies sourced text which discusses in detail the appearance of the proposed memorial to the crash victims. Passes WP:NFCC#8; I wouldn't have uploaded it if I hadn't believed that. Daniel Case (talk) 20:18, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Omission would not be detrimental to readers' understanding of the article topic (the crash, not the memorial). (WP:NFCC#8) — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Articles about most disasters usually include sections about memorials, actual or proposed. It's part of the topic. Daniel Case (talk) 22:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't make it the topic of the article. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:59, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.