This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
This page needs work. There are far more scientific instruments than the five listed so far.
Recommend instruments be added and once it starts to get unwieldly to subdivide them into classes and creating a reverse index, i.e. datum -> instrument(s). Also recommend adding and linking a stub on the fields of measument, eg: photogrammetry, interferometry, etc.
Not sure if a list of manufacturers is applicable, but it is useful if currently very incomplete.
In the meantime, I'll add a few off the top of my head. Should something like a borescope be included in this list? ~~spacedan
As we go - what do you think about a table of both instruments in each category but also links to open-source hardware verisons? I think it is line with the wikipedia mission. My only concern is that most are very new and there has not been a lot of articles written about them to pass wikipedia noteworthy status. I have only found one Science article talking abou the general concept. PLOS One has published some individual tools as well. -Luli17 (talk) 21:16, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]