Jump to content

Talk:History of Kerala

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Raccoonvs (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2011 (UTC) Last paragraph of the article states[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

"Furthermore, a substantial proportion of Mappilas numbering between 3 and 4 million people have left Kerala to seek employment in the Middle East, especially in Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Remittances from these expatriate communities makes Kerala one of the main contributors of foreign exchange to Indian economy."

I have not been able to find any statistic to support this claim. The number of 3-4 million is questionable as i found a site mentioning 2.5 million diaspora from Kerala.

Secondly, It is not only the Mappilass, but a lot of Keralites belonging to other religions also are working overseas and i dont think there is any reliable statistic about the expatriate population from Kerala segregated on the basis of religion.

Please provide link to support this claim.00:39, 9 June 2011 (UTC)Raccoonvs (talk)



Regarding the section titled "Overseas contact"

[edit]

I have a few issues with this section:

  • Jewish people, fleeing persecution in their homeland, migrated to Kerala in the early centuries.
We have got to clearly define what homeland is being referred to here and what the early centuries are.homeland is refereed to "Jerusalem " & early centuries to period of King Solomon --117.199.5.100 (talk) 07:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Arab merchants founded Kerala's early Muslim community, the Mappilas, in the 8th century.
Arab merchants very likely had settlements in Kerala well before they became Muslim.Yes, their descents belong Syrian Christians along with Jewish migrants --117.199.5.100 (talk) 07:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to some the history of Christianity in Kerala dates back to the arrival of St. Thomas the Apostle at Kodungallur in A.D. 52.
This is folklore. Besides we seem to be jumping back in time. This should be mentioned before the arrival of Islam to Kerala to retain chronological order.
  • For a long time this was disputed. However in 2002 The British researcher William Dalrymple travelled across the Arabian Sea to Kerala in a boat similar to those mentioned in ancient Jewish and Roman texts and showed how the Nasrani-Jewish people had travelled to Kodungalloor. He followed the same course as mentioned in the Acts of Thomas, a copy of which survives in a monastery on Mount Sinai.
    The possibility of such a journey is not disputed. Pliny records Muziris(Kodungallur) as the most important sea-port on India's West Coast around the start of the Christian Era. Lionel Casson discusses the sailing patterns of ships via the Red Sea to Kodungallur in his 1988 analysis of Periplus of the Erythraean Sea.
    What is disputed is whether the Apostle really did land in Kerala and proselytize. We do have Syrian Malabar folklore that claim this. We also have some East Christian writings that claim the Apostle was buried on India's East Coast.
  • A Christian-Jewish community was later established by a contingent of Jewish Nasranis led by Knai Thoma (Thomas of Cana) who arrived in 345. Cheraman Perumal, the then king of Malabar issued a proclamation giving land and privileges to the Knanaya Yehudeya(Jewish)-Nasranis on copper plates on a Saturday in March (Kumbham 29), 345. This was followed by another round of migration from Syria recorded in the Tharisappally records from around the 8th century.
    The growth of the Christian and Muslim communities is not captured by references to these specific migrations. I feel we will have to beef it up with accounts of settlements and trading-outposasasasts these merchants were allowed to build as well as their elevation in the social heirarchy in the various Keralite kingdoms. No,this migrants have influence only the coastal parts & they have some social hierarchy but negligible,they got social influence by past 500 years --Sinud3 (talk) 07:49, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • When the Portuguese arrived in the early 1500s, they tried to impose Roman Catholicism on the original Syrian-Christian (Nasrani) people. A section of Nasranis (also called Syrian-Christians in Kerala) resisted the conversion attempts of the Portuguese to bring them under Romans or the Pope with Latin rite, and remained faithful to ancient Hebrew-Jewish traditions using original Syriac/Aramaic language for their liturgy.
    This is overly simplistic and false. The Synod of Diamper forced the Nasranis into communion with Rome. Following this Bishop Menezes had the Inquisition brought in and went Church by Church Romanizing parishes. When Portugese hegemony over Kerala waned, the Nasranis started to rebel againt Roman control. The Incident of the Leaning Cross is among the mroe famous acts of rebillion. After such incidents became widespread various Churches around West Asia and the Roman Catholic Church itself sent emissaries to bring the parishes into communion with them. This eventually resulted in the various Syrian Christian denominations of Kerala. British hegemony created the Protestant Syrian Christian denominations of the Marthomites and the CSI.

Comments?(Veliath 16:36, 31 January 2006 (UTC))[reply]

BCE-CE Vs BC-AD

[edit]

Since BC ("Before Christ") and AD ("Anno Domini", "In the year of the Lord") represent a Christian Point of View, i have replaced it with their secularized versions ie. BCE ("Before Common Era") and CE ("Common Era") in the entire length of this article keeping in tone with Wikipedia's NPOV policy. Before any reverts to this pls discuss in here . Thanks. Arjun (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chithira Thirunal Balarama Varma, last ruling maharaja of Travancore.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Chithira Thirunal Balarama Varma, last ruling maharaja of Travancore.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:08, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vasco da Gama entrega a carta do rei Dom Manuel I de Portugal ao Samorim de Calicute.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Vasco da Gama entrega a carta do rei Dom Manuel I de Portugal ao Samorim de Calicute.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:07, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:E. M. S. Namboodiripad.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:E. M. S. Namboodiripad.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:E. M. S. Namboodiripad.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in History of Kerala

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of History of Kerala's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Sharma":

  • From Adi Shankara: Sharma, Chandradhar (1962). "Chronological Summary of History of Indian Philosophy". Indian Philosophy: A Critical Survey. New York: Barnes & Noble. p. vi.
  • From Samkhya: Sharma 1997, pp. 149–68

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:24, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Done. AshLey Msg 13:00, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

regarding section "Ancient religions and ethnic groups"

[edit]

This section mentions that nambudiris in Kerala are originally the brahmins from Karnataka. This is probably not true since there are several other stories about the origin of nambudiri brahmins. Sreedhara menon attributes their origin to people who fled from Godavari basin while some others suggests that nambudiris are brahmins who came from north India with the invaders. So it will be in best interest to delete this line altogether.

The article mentions establishment of 32 brahmin settlements in kerala towards the end of 8th C. This notion of 'Brahmin gramas' appears to be taken from the 17th C book 'Keralolpathi'. Most of the modern kerala historians rejects the authenticity of this book and hence the story of 32 'Brahmin gramas' is likely to be not true.

The last line seems to implicitly suggest that Malayalam language originated by Sanskritisation of Tamil under the influence of nambudiris. The origin of Malayalam language is a heavily debated topic. The earlier works like 'Keralapaaniniyam' concurs with this argument but later scholars differ. Parameswaran Nair, in his book on Malayalam Literature convincingly argues that Malayalam and Tamil are two daughter languages to the same primitive Dravidian language with Malayalam being more closer to the original. The influence of sanskrit was only minimal and hence Malayalam had an independent identity even before the so called process of Sanskritisation. --James.puthenpurackal (talk) 14:17, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on History of Kerala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:35, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:History of Kerala/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

this article is incomplete.Start class is Justified.

Last edited at 08:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 18:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Kerala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on History of Kerala. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spice Trade and Sumerian Records

[edit]

This line "Kerala was a major spice exporter as early as 3000 BCE, according to Sumerian records." uses the refers to p. 79 of "Striving for sustainability, environmental stress and democratic initiatives in Kerala". But if you check that page in that book, there it only just says, "Kerala's fabled spice trade--itself based in part in the rich micro-ecozone variability--goes back possibility to the Sumer (Babylonia)of 3000BC." And there is no reference or source mentioned for that. I don't this is sufficient evidence for the claim mentioned above. Prophetoffrivolity (talk) 13:58, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Prophetoffrivolity. There is very thin evidence for spice trade that goes that far. I think that line should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A452:8EAA:1:6052:B468:7439:3B42 (talk) 19:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See also

[edit]

in the See also give link to Cheras. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chera_dynasty give highlight link wherever it says Chera. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dlightgselva (talk • contribs) 16:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kerala Should Be Renamed To Keralam

[edit]

Kerala Assembly unanimously passes resolution to change official name of State to ‘Keralam’. Arun S 7651 (talk) 13:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Kerala&oldid=1264708616"