What does a comp plan with an aligned Solutions function look like?
This is the question I get asked the most right now, and for good reason.
Solutions professions are typically 80/20 or 75/25 to limit their downside (and upside).
And, that is why there is friction from Solutions professionals who feel they make superhero efforts to bring deals in but don't receive the glory or compensation (aka one of the reasons I was motivated to start PreSales Collective).
Let's start with a FACT: Incentives drive behavior.
Here is a roadmap to changing comp plans in the aligned solutions org.
Change 1: Willingness to take on less base salary to provide for more upside: 65/35 - 50/50
- Sales reps live and die on 50/50, and we typically don't want our solutions in that model, but you cannot make AE OTE without the accountability
- Note: this is the most challenging change for people in the role, so a slow roll to 50/50-ish is typically the suggested path (let them experience the upside)
Change 2: Prevent downside by making variable both commission and MBOs
- Flat rate commission on net new, expansion, and cross-sell
- MBOs for renewals
- MBOs on Account Health Metrics (plays run against customers to increase value metric, adoption, utilization, etc...)
Change 3: Full Cycle Solutions are included in SPIFFs
- No more days of Rolexs and Spa days for just AEs. Sales is a team sport.
- SPIFFs for programs run within a quarter or the year
- SPIFFs can also be used instead of MBOs to increase upside (renewal, etc..)
This type of comp plan may be the norm in your business, but this may likely be a [radical] shift.
And for those who say this model will impact the customer experience if we are just focused on revenue, there is a reason why you use MBOs and SPIFFs to drive the proper behavior with customers (account health plays >>>>).
Note: employees are not incentivized to go above and beyond for customers when your teams are at 100% or 90% base salary with no upside.