Provizual

Headed to Procore Groundbreak in Denver next week? Schedule an in person demo and see how you can make your Procore QAQC process more efficient. Sign up today for a 30 day free trial: https://lnkd.in/gMJVbkqq

🎆 Happy 4th of July from Provizual! 🇺🇸 Wishing everyone a Happy Independence Day! As we all celebrate today surrounded by the Red, White, and Blue, let's remember the values these colors represent—bravery, purity, and justice. #4thOfJuly #IndependenceDay #Provizual #RedWhiteAndBlue #Happy4th #ConstructionAI #ConstructionColors

2 NEW FEATURES! We now connect into Procore Technologies Punch List and Observations so you can visualize where your issues are on the drawings. You can do things like show a trade partner a heat map of their punch/observation items on the drawings, or filter the Punch list heat map by assignee company to show those difficult units that may require a special plan so everyone isn't working on top of each other. Sign up today for a free 30 day trial! https://lnkd.in/gHNrXQXY

Procore quality control survey follow up! I am blown away by the amount (and quality) of responses y'all provided on this survey. We got over 50 responses in just over 2 weeks with representation from 6 countries and 35 different states! I wanted to do this survey to understand how companies use Procore to do quality control differently. Between new hires with Procore experience having different ways of doing QAQC, speaking with different people at conferences and on Provizual demos, I knew there are a lot of opinions on this. 🏁 The Survey Results 🏁 The basis of the survey was this. Do you use Inspections, do you use Observations, do you use Punch List, a combo of 2, or all 3. While there was a range in answers, 62% of the responses were that people use all 3 tools for quality control. (9.5% were inspections only, 9.5% were Inspections + Observations, 7.5% punch list only, 3.5% Inspections + Punch List, the rest was "other") When asked about how people use Inspections, 39.6% don't pass all inspection items prior to closing the inspection. Only 28.3% of the people surveyed say they close all items prior to closing the inspection. Interestingly, the more tools people use, the more likely people don't pass all items. Inspections only was majority pass all, and Inspections + Observations and Inspections + Punch were split 50/50. The survey also asked if the inspections are set up where all questions are asked so the responses "Pass/Yes" are Good and the "Fail/No" are Bad, to which 30.2% said yes, and 35.8% said no. When using just 1 or 2 tools it was 100% yes, so the majority of no's here came from those using all 3 tools. The 62% that use all 3 tools, almost 92% of them use observations for both quality and safety, and 7.5% use observations only for quality control. Now, while this wasn't meant to be a safety survey, it was important to ask because it requires 2 processes to be managed in the same tool. When it comes to locations there is an interesting trend. 68.2% of people always include a location on every Inspection, 83.3% of people include a location on every Observation, and 100% of people include a location on every Punch List item. Feature Wish List: 50% A visual tool to show where inspections are happening on the drawings ✅ 42.8% A way to link inspection items to a company ✅ 47.6% A way to report on inspection tool with pictures ✅ 35.7% A notification system to alert when inspections are closed with failed items ✅ 42.8% Automatically update a daily log entry 💡 30.9% Failed data analytics 💡 Thanks for everyones participation! See comments for my thoughts...