Work the contract within the scope of the design. Anything beyond without the agreement of both parties- client and contractor is considered scope creep. Quite hard to qualify and quantify cost incurred to client. In the engineering and construction world, feasibility is conducted at the very start of project. Now, if innovation is part of the scope make sure it is definite and measurable. Must have beginning and end.

When racing against the clock to finalize a design, balancing innovation with feasibility is crucial. You'll need to make smart choices to ensure your design is both creative and practical. Here's a quick guide to help you decide: Assess project goals: Determine whether the primary focus is on innovation or timely delivery. Project Contract: Check what mentioned in the Contract. Follow the Contact. Evaluate resources: Check available materials, tools, and team expertise to gauge what's feasible within the deadline. Iterate efficiently: Use rapid prototyping to test ideas quickly and refine designs based on immediate feedback. This is how we can balance innovation and feasibility in the designs.

In a race against the clock, feasibility often takes precedence. While innovation is important, delivering a workable solution within the time constraints is crucial. A feasible design ensures that you meet deadlines and objectives effectively, even if it means postponing certain innovative aspects for future iterations.However, you can strive for a balance: focus on feasible solutions while incorporating small, innovative tweaks that don't compromise the timeline.

When I am at the stage of a finalizing a design I assume that the design phase is at least 60% accomplished already. Thus, much studies and iterations had already been made and agreed upon. The iterations and lessons learned prior to the finalization of a design should had been identified as to which ones are helpful, economical, feasible or not. However, so as to ensure the timely completion of the design effort and to stay within budget, I would chose about 60% innovation efforts and accommodate or entertain about 40% feasibility efforts.

In a time-sensitive situation, feasibility might need to take priority to ensure the design is completed on time, functional, and within constraints. However, if there’s room for iteration or if the design is critical for standing out, it’s worth finding a balance where you can still inject innovative elements without compromising the feasibility of the final product. Prioritizing a practical innovation—one that’s both creative and executable—is often the best solution.

When racing against time, I prioritize feasibility to deliver a design that is safe, practical, and manufacturable within the given constraints. While innovation is valuable, the immediate need for timely deliverables often necessitates focusing on proven, efficient solutions to reduce design time and ensure reliability. By communicating this approach to stakeholders, I ensure alignment on priorities while maintaining the potential for future innovation in subsequent design iterations.