Conflicting design needs are opportunities for innovation rather than barriers. When stakeholders disagree, I work to create a collaborative environment in which we map out requirements against essential project objectives. By explicitly visualising trade-offs and anchoring talks in quantifiable measures, we can direct stakeholders towards balanced solutions that align with the project's vision. This technique turns potential disagreements into stepping stones towards improved design outputs.

Root. What was the mvp... Head back to that and decipher rank of new features from there...

If the demand from stakeholders is technically acceptable then formalize the changes required. If technically not acceptable explain why it cannot be implemented and take the stakeholder in confidence.

It is a very important issue for Project Management. 🏗 To navigate conflicting design demands from stakeholders, prioritize clear communication and active listening. 🦺 Begin by understanding each stakeholder’s needs and concerns, identifying underlying priorities. 🤔Facilitate a collaborative discussion to align goals and find common ground. 🧱 Use data, design principles, or project constraints to justify decisions and propose balanced solutions. 🏣Maintain transparency and document agreements to manage expectations effectively. 📜 Adopting a solution-focused approach ensures stakeholder satisfaction while keeping the project on track.✔️

I approach conflicting design demands by thoroughly assessing their feasibility, impact, and alignment with the agreed-upon final outcome. I prioritize demands that contribute the most value and identify those that may not align with the project’s objectives. I then engage stakeholders in transparent discussions, clearly explaining the trade-offs and the importance of focusing on the most impactful design elements. This collaborative approach ensures alignment, builds trust, and maintains the integrity of the project’s goals.