Com minha experiência, sei que em projetos de engenharia a expertise é fundamental para defender uma ideia, mas sempre com a consciência de que há múltiplos caminhos para a solução. Quando enfrento críticas: Ouço atentamente as diferentes opiniões, entendendo que cada ponto de vista é válido e pode enriquecer o projeto. Defendo minhas ideias com base na experiência e dados concretos, mostrando a lógica por trás das minhas escolhas. Proponho alternativas, quando necessário, para adaptar e melhorar o projeto sem perder a essência da minha proposta inicial. Em projetos, acredito que a expertise nos permite defender com firmeza nossas ideias, mas sempre com flexibilidade para explorar diferentes caminhos e encontrar a melhor solução.

here's few steps to handle the situation firstly, Acknowledge the Feedback: I start by recognizing the feedback and showing that I’m open to constructive dialogue. This sets a positive tone and makes it clear that I value the input, even if I don’t fully agree. Reference Supporting Data or Research: I explain the design decisions by referencing relevant data, research, or testing results. This provides a solid foundation for why certain choices were made, demonstrating that the design is backed by careful analysis and not just intuition. Present Alternative Solutions: If the criticism raises valid concerns, I offer alternative solutions that address those issues while still maintaining the design's integrity.

Listen carefully and ask questions to fully understand the critique. Ensure you’re addressing the real issue, not just a perceived one. Reiterate the core problem your design addresses. Emphasize how the concept directly solves that problem or improves upon existing solutions. Provide real-world relevance or use cases to demonstrate the importance of your approach. Compare your solution to alternatives, highlighting unique advantages like efficiency, scalability, or cost-effectiveness. Acknowledge potential weaknesses but frame them as calculated trade-offs for achieving the design’s goals. If improvements are possible, present them as part of an iterative process, demonstrating adaptability.

Design critique provides a significant potential for growth and innovation. When confronted with scepticism, I emphasise how our design approach uniquely fulfils core user needs through data-driven validation and real-world testing outcomes. Rather than becoming defensive, I engage critics by acknowledging their issues and using their feedback to improve the design while retaining its basic advantages. This collaborative approach frequently results in better solutions that benefit all parties.