my recommendations will be as follows: 1) build robust test plan that is telescopic in terms of being able to execute it in phases. 2) build automation. following 80-20 rule, you can always automate testing bulk of features. 3) don't forget to retain experts when in crunch of time, you can do a limited testing focusing on: 1) automated pieces 2) execute only critical/relevant tests that are hand picked to address the immediate need. the experts should be able to select the required tests based on context and application

Here are some approaches that can help you manage the workload while maintaining high standards: 1) Use grading software to speed up grading. 2) Use peer review or ask teaching assistants to help with grading simpler tasks. 3) Create rubrics that are aligned with your key criteria. Rubrics help maintain consistency and ensure you're grading each student's work against the same set of expectations.

When grading becomes overwhelming, it's important to maintain quality without sacrificing standards. I start by creating a clear rubric with specific criteria, which helps streamline the evaluation process and ensures consistency. I would also attempt to use grading software to handle repetitive tasks, saving time and reducing errors. To stay focused and avoid burnout, I set aside dedicated time blocks for grading, making it easier to manage my workload. These strategies help me maintain high standards while keeping stress in check.

To maintain quality in grading without sacrificing standards, prioritize efficient and strategic approaches to manage the workload. Start by organizing and segmenting tasks, such as grading in batches or focusing on one criterion at a time, to stay consistent and reduce errors. Utilize rubrics and clear grading criteria to streamline evaluations and ensure fairness. Incorporate technology, like grading software or online platforms, to automate repetitive tasks such as calculations or checking for plagiarism. Delegate where possible, involving teaching assistants or peer reviews for preliminary assessments, while ensuring oversight to maintain quality. Schedule dedicated time blocks for grading to stay focused and avoid fatigue,

Prioritize rubrics that clearly outline expectations, making it faster to assess work while maintaining fairness. Utilize technology—automated tools can help grade objective parts of assignments, saving time for subjective evaluation. Batch similar types of assignments together, which helps establish a consistent rhythm and reduces mental fatigue. Provide concise, focused feedback rather than lengthy comments. Delegate tasks where possible, and remember, it’s okay to scale back on perfectionism while focusing on core learning outcomes.

Alignment is the key - assessments that actually facilitate student outcomes. The other piece we have learnt is all around timings - don't create additional unnecessary pressures for teachers or students simply because of when assessments are due. As many have testified over time: context is king.

Maintaining quality in grading while managing an overwhelming workload requires prioritisation, efficiency, and strategic planning. Start by organising and segmenting your tasks. Break down the grading workload into manageable chunks and set clear deadlines for each section. Focus on the most critical components first, such as assignments with the greatest weight or those needing immediate feedback. Use grading rubrics to streamline the evaluation process. A well-designed rubric ensures consistency and fairness, reducing the cognitive load of deciding criteria for each submission. Share the rubric with students beforehand so they understand the expectations, which may also lead to better-quality submissions.