Steps to approach: 1. Understand the Underlying Concerns. Ask clarifying questions to uncover the rationale behind each piece of feedback. 2. Identify Common Ground. Look for overlapping themes or shared goals between differing opinions. This can help build consensus. 3. Prioritize Based on Impact and Feasibility. Evaluate which feedback has the greatest potential to improve the user experience or meet project objectives. 4. Facilitate Open Discussion. Organize a collaborative session where stakeholders can explain their perspectives. 5. Propose a Balanced Solution. Suggest compromises that address the core concerns of each party. 6. Document and Communicate Decisions. Summarize the chosen direction and the reasoning behind it.

It is a positive aspect of review All points with details of protectives will to build the common goals. Each team member has to take a step forward or backward based on common goals including design team

Conflict on design review are common and the way to deal with is by listening and having further discussions on solutions that can be implemented based on client interests and what is possible due to design constraints and codes and standards that need to be followed. Collaboration is the best way to find solutions for conflict and improve projects by sharing new points of view that you might not have previously thought about.

In engineering design, conflicting feedback during reviews can be challenging. Balancing diverse opinions is key to achieving a cohesive outcome. Here's how to reconcile these perspectives: Seek common goals: Identify shared objectives to align differing viewpoints. Prioritize clarity: Clearly outline the pros and cons of each suggestion to facilitate informed decisions. Encourage collaboration: Foster an environment where team members can discuss and refine ideas together.

To handle conflict, -Active Listening: Listen attentively, paraphrase, ask questions, and avoid interruptions. -Empathy: Understand the reasons behind each perspective, acknowledge their validity, and show respect. -Prioritization: Identify core issues and prioritize critical feedback based on impact. -Collaboration: Encourage open discussion, seek common ground, and involve all stakeholders. Data-Driven Decisions: Use data and research to support choices and address concerns. -Compromise: Be willing to compromise on certain aspects, finding middle ground. -Iterative Design: View design as an evolving process, open to changes and refinements. -Clear Communication: Articulate decisions clearly, address concerns directly, and use visuals.

Meet the designers, stakeholders, involved in the design process and hear their feedback. Check the Scope, related laws, standards, discuss constructively again with the designers, if the conflict is only with them, for a design approval and finalization

Conflicting feedback in design reviews is a day-in, day-out issue. My approach is simple: First, identify whether the constraint is in design, commercial, schedule, or a mix of these. Gather input from the relevant departments, and brainstorm without rushing to conclusions. Often, the unspoken concerns reveal the real issues, so listening beyond the words is key to understanding the crux. After organizing the core points, the next step is convincing everyone to compromise, adjust, and align on necessary changes, with safety as the priority. Essentially, safe design and economic feasibility go hand-in-hand.

The whole thing is a dynamic process.... I personally appreciate any criticism during design review cause believe that through this it's easier to end up with a solid design that works.

Whaen it comes to feedback and criticism on my design work,I always welcome it as an opportunity for growth and improvement. I believe that constructive feedback is essential in my skills and producing better design. Xirst, I make sure to listen attentively and ask clarifying questions.Next,I take the time to reflect on the feedback and evalyate it objectively. If i agree with it , I immediately implement the changes.If there are differing opinions or conflicting feedback, I seek guidance from more experienced colleagues. Ultimately ,I viee feedback as a valuable tool to enhance my design abilities and deliver the best possible results.

Conflict arises between two persons or groups of people because of differences in knowledge, understanding the design and implementation process. The matter can be resolved by: 1. one to one meeting and identifying areas of conflict 2. all concerned parties to come out their plans specifically and their ideas to be shared among all 3. points of consensus and contention to be segregated 4. latest technological innovations to be prioritised under reference of cost-benefit analysis 5. past track record and feedbacks from other companies where such plans were implemented, may be helpful in finalising blueprint 6. finance and implementation process to be in synchronisation to cater the pent up demand 7. a committee to be made to monitor all