You're facing resistance from a partner company on contract changes. How can you convince them to adapt?
When faced with resistance over contract modifications, effective persuasion tactics are key. To navigate this challenge:
- Emphasize mutual benefits. Highlight how the changes can positively impact both parties.
- Provide data-driven arguments. Use concrete statistics and case studies to support your points.
- Offer compromises. Be willing to make concessions that align with their core concerns.
How do you approach negotiations when resistance arises? Share your strategies.
You're facing resistance from a partner company on contract changes. How can you convince them to adapt?
When faced with resistance over contract modifications, effective persuasion tactics are key. To navigate this challenge:
- Emphasize mutual benefits. Highlight how the changes can positively impact both parties.
- Provide data-driven arguments. Use concrete statistics and case studies to support your points.
- Offer compromises. Be willing to make concessions that align with their core concerns.
How do you approach negotiations when resistance arises? Share your strategies.
-
Resistance in contract negotiations reflects concerns that must be understood, not dismissed. Ground the discussion in mutual priorities, demonstrating how the changes secure their interests and align with their goals. Present clear and tailored evidence, not just statistics but examples of how similar decisions have created value for others. Listen actively, not merely to respond, but to understand their perspective. Offer a carefully considered adjustment that addresses their concerns without compromising your position. True influence lies in helping them see the decision as a win for their side. Resistance is not an obstacle; it is an invitation to lead.
-
Get curious. Ask more questions to understand why there is resistance. Then apply tactics to solve those. So often we don’t understand the root issue and end up offering solutions that don’t resolve the key issue
-
Any contract change should aim to create a mutually beneficial outcome for both parties, ensuring a win-win situation. If this principle holds, it will be essential to effectively communicate the advantages to the partner company. Failing to do so could lead to potential financial consequences.
-
"Resistance", "Partner Company"- the most important aspects of this situation. Given that the counterpart is partner company, it is useful to communicate that the end goal is same and look at the differences as a team. That said, clarity is important. Their PoV has to align with yours to ensure mutually beneficial end. Getting all stakeholders on the table and open discussion and help resolve these issues.
-
For professional contract negotiators, the starting point is always the specific interests of the parties. They may take positions & dig their heals in without realizing that their underlying interests are not being met as effectively as they could be, or even at all! Why are the parties in a contract in the 1st place? What brought them together? What opportunities have arisen in the current work that might "make the pie bigger"? Understand their motivation. Ask the "why" questions for proceeding & possibly not proceeding. Find value on both sides that does not involve added cost (those are NOT the same!) What ancillary interests might be addressed that were not part of the original bargain? Find certainty in the new business transaction.
-
Context, type of contract, term of the relationship, reasons for changes? With some basic information, response could a liitle bit accurate, otherwise, would be wish list of actions
-
Las personas usualmente presentamos resistencia al cambio; en las empresas es igual. Entonces, ¿cómo se enfrenta el problema de presentar un cambio no esperado? Lo más importante será ser claros en mencionar aquello que causó el cambio, y presentar las oportunidades que este cambio traería. Por ejemplo, negociar con aspectos de precios, plazos, garantías, lugares y formas de entrega, etc. La modificación debe representar una ventaja para todas las partes involucradas; por ejemplo, quizá una parte tenía intención de vender un proyecto y recibir el precio en un solo pago, pero por otra parte, si no se le puede pagar todo en un solo momento se le podría ofrecer un plan de pagos con una tasa mayor a la que podría obtener en el mercado.
-
In any contract negotiation, resistance from the other party is a natural part of the process. It is important to address this by focusing on the legal rationale behind the proposed changes and clearly demonstrating why they are necessary. Emphasizing mutual benefit is key—showing how the adjustments can enhance the relationship, reduce risks, or create efficiencies for both sides. A collaborative approach, where both parties’ concerns are acknowledged and addressed, will help foster agreement and ensure that the revised terms are fair and balanced.
-
It is very important to explain the need to make contractual changes to the opposite party and also most importantly win over the trust in you....and finally these changes have to be fair and not changes for the sake of changes....
-
As a negotiator the key to tackle resistance by a partner for any contract clause is to understand the 'Why''' and find a workable solution within your organisation's risk appetite.
Rate this article
More relevant reading
-
NegotiationHow do you shape negotiations with framing and anchoring?
-
Business StrategyHow can you use anchoring to your advantage in negotiation talks?
-
NegotiationHow would you handle a team member who undermines your concessions during a critical negotiation?
-
NegotiationYou're facing a tough negotiation with a difficult counterpart. How do you handle concessions effectively?