Acho que encontrar um terreno comum começa com o diálogo aberto entre educadores, focando nos benefícios e preocupações de ambos os lados. É importante mostrar evidências práticas de como as ferramentas podem melhorar o aprendizado sem sobrecarregar os professores. Também acredito que oferecer treinamento e flexibilidade no uso das tecnologias ajuda a equilibrar diferentes perspectivas. Por fim, ouvir constantemente o feedback cria um ambiente de colaboração, não de imposição.

Highlight the 'why': Emphasize how the tech enhances teaching, not replaces it. Take it step by step: Introduce tools gradually, starting with simple, impactful ones.

It's like any change initiative - there will be varying levels of comfort and enthusiasm. I'd start by facilitating open dialogue. What are the specific concerns? What are the perceived benefits? Maybe pilot the new tool with a small group and gather feedback. Finding common ground often involves compromise and demonstrating a willingness to listen and adapt.

La tecnología como tal no es nueva, ésto en referencia al contexto educativo, desde las TIC hasta la actualidad con el blended learning. Y es que hay que desmitificar el hecho que con los avances tecnológicos la educación no ha cambiado, me gusta mejor la palabra de EVOLUCIONADO, ya que con conceptos como flipped room (aulas invertidas), chatbot, inteligencia artificial generativa. Las competencias docentes, si han cambiado, y es de vital importancia que dichas competencias sean incluidas en la formacion docente, y no se evidencie la brecha tecnologica generacional.

Educators Divided on New Tech Tools? Here's How to Find Common Ground 1) Facilitate Open Dialogues Organize discussions where educators can share their concerns, expectations, and experiences. This helps uncover shared goals and address misconceptions about the tools. 2) Pilot and Gather Feedback Run a trial phase with a small group to evaluate the tool’s effectiveness. Use real-world results and teacher input to guide decisions and build collective trust. 3) Focus on Student Outcomes Shift the conversation to how the tool impacts learning. Highlight features that align with curriculum goals and demonstrate clear benefits for student engagement and success.

Generally, for this type of articles, some very specific and accurate guidelines are given, but I really think that this has not been the case, since they are complex to carry out and very slow in their decision-making. The first idea is to look for a series of minimum requirements and needs that must be covered, as user stories. Then, try to carry out a work of continuous expansion and improvement, understanding technological adoption as something cyclical. Finally, I think that there must be complete and above all abundant feedback, to try to obtain the maximum contribution from teachers, not only in pursuit of improvement but also to make them participate in the change. Make them part of the implementation.