Veja como você pode lidar efetivamente com o feedback como designer de jogos.

Tener siempre una mente abierta y tener autocrítica frente a las opiniones que recibimos es muy importante para poder tomar las decisiones más objetivas. Nunca se deben tener en cuenta las opiniones como algo negativo siempre como algo constructivo que permita evolucionar el videojuego.

In the realm of game design, embracing feedback is essential for innovation and improvement. Beyond traditional critiques, tapping into player data can provide valuable insights into what keeps players engaged, which parts of the game need improvement, and how to better monetize through ads

Effectively sorting feedback involves not just categorizing by type but also prioritizing based on impact and alignment with your game's vision. For instance, prioritizing feedback that enhances core gameplay mechanics or aligns with your narrative direction can lead to more meaningful improvements. Consider the credibility and experience of the feedback source ensures that decisions are grounded in both player needs and strategic design goals, fostering a balanced approach to iterating and refining your game.

Objectively analyzing feedback involves maintaining a clear focus on improving the player experience while staying true to your game's vision. This approach ensures that each adjustment serves a purpose in enhancing gameplay, retention, or monetization strategies. By prioritizing feedback that aligns with both player expectations and strategic goals, you can iteratively refine your game to resonate more deeply with your target audience, ultimately driving engagement and profitability.

Para poder implementar estratégicamente y poder tener en cuenta la retroalimentación que se recibe de los jugadores es necesario contar de antemano con una planificación a alto nivel y a un medio largo plazo. Es muy importante para poder tener una planificación con visión

Strategic implementation of feedback hinges on balancing immediate improvements with long-term game vision. Prioritize feedback that enhances core mechanics or aligns with monetization goals to maximize impact. By integrating changes systematically and setting clear timelines, you maintain momentum in development while continuously refining player experience. This approach not only strengthens game engagement but also fosters a responsive development cycle that adapts to evolving player needs and market dynamics, ensuring sustained success.

It's not possible to please everyone. What matters is the data. Data = What you see in analytics from UNKNOW players. If you're in the early stage and someone who can "talk to you" comments: That comment doesn't hold much importance. Instead of relying on feedback from acquaintances, test the game in its simplest form. There is no end to feedback. No one is a soothsayer; any interpretation without a data based is a prophecy. The more you test with unknown players, the more efficiently you can achieve success. Even commercial failures can reveal what didn't work. I've never seen a successful game ONLY relying on feedback from players who can "talk to you"; maybe others have good luck (all you need if you don't test enough)