1.Classificação por Impacto e Probabilidade: Usei uma matriz de risco que combina o impacto potencial de uma ameaça com a probabilidade de ocorrência. Isso ajudou a focar nos riscos que poderiam causar os maiores danos e eram mais prováveis de se materializar. 2.Monitoramento Contínuo e Detecção Precoce: Implementei ferramentas de monitoramento em tempo real para detectar vulnerabilidades à medida que surgem. Isso permitiu uma resposta rápida às ameaças mais imediatas e evitou que pequenos problemas se agravassem. 3.Análise de Comportamento de Ameaças: Investi em inteligência de ameaças para identificar ataques emergentes ou técnicas usadas por atores maliciosos.

To prioritize cybersecurity threats, I focus on three factors: impact, likelihood, and vulnerability. First, I assess the potential damage a threat could cause to critical systems and data. High-impact threats, especially those affecting essential services, take precedence. Next, I evaluate the likelihood of each threat, using intelligence on emerging risks relevant to our industry. Finally, I assess our exposure, prioritizing threats tied to known vulnerabilities in our infrastructure. This structured, risk-based approach ensures we address the most critical threats effectively, balancing proactive measures with rapid response.

Prioritize based on the potential impact and likelihood of threats. Focus on protecting critical assets and data, use a layered security approach, involve stakeholders, and continuously monitor and update your strategy.

Priorizo as ameaças de segurança cibernética com base no impacto que elas podem causar às operações da empresa. Primeiro, analiso quais ativos são mais críticos e quais ameaças podem comprometê-los. Também levo em conta a probabilidade de uma ameaça ocorrer e a eficácia das medidas de prevenção disponíveis. A inteligência de ameaças ajuda a identificar novas vulnerabilidades, enquanto a conformidade regulatória direciona a atenção para riscos que envolvem dados sensíveis. Por fim, considero a capacidade da equipe de responder rapidamente e minimizar danos em caso de incidentes.

Best strategy is to think like the owner, look at the basic "tenets" of the business which is its bottom-line, assess and weigh which among the cybersecurity threats would hurt the most (and the soonest), and decide to prioritize the implementation of protective measures or counter-measures from there.

As a CISO managing IT operations across clients in various industries, we prioritize cybersecurity threats using threat intelligence, risk assessments, and alignment with business objectives. Threat intelligence highlights emerging risks, while scoring systems like CVSS assess severity. We then gauge each threat’s impact on critical assets, such as customer data, to prevent disruptions. Likelihood and regulatory compliance also shape prioritization, with high-priority focus on threats that risk fines or legal issues. Factoring in lateral movement potential, control gaps, and response readiness, we categorize threats to ensure focus on those with the greatest impact.

From a process standpoint, using a risk framework to categorize threats is a good starting point. However, when posed with a threat where there are several unknowns, I would treat it as top priority. In my opinion it is better to overreact with a threat.