El miembro del equipo ignora los comentarios de la revisión del código. ¿Cómo se asegura de que sus contribuciones cumplan con el estándar?
Cuando un miembro del equipo pasa por alto los comentarios de la revisión del código, es esencial abordarlo para mantener la calidad de su proyecto. Pruebe estas estrategias:
- Inicie una discusión uno a uno para comprender su perspectiva y reforzar la importancia de las revisiones de código.
- Establecer estándares claros y medibles para las contribuciones de código en los que todos estén de acuerdo.
- Implementar un programa de mentoría en el que los desarrolladores experimentados guíen a los menos acostumbrados al proceso.
¿Cómo se manejan las situaciones en las que se ignoran los comentarios de revisión de código? Comparte tus estrategias.
El miembro del equipo ignora los comentarios de la revisión del código. ¿Cómo se asegura de que sus contribuciones cumplan con el estándar?
Cuando un miembro del equipo pasa por alto los comentarios de la revisión del código, es esencial abordarlo para mantener la calidad de su proyecto. Pruebe estas estrategias:
- Inicie una discusión uno a uno para comprender su perspectiva y reforzar la importancia de las revisiones de código.
- Establecer estándares claros y medibles para las contribuciones de código en los que todos estén de acuerdo.
- Implementar un programa de mentoría en el que los desarrolladores experimentados guíen a los menos acostumbrados al proceso.
¿Cómo se manejan las situaciones en las que se ignoran los comentarios de revisión de código? Comparte tus estrategias.
-
To address ignored code review feedback, I first have a one-on-one conversation to understand their concerns and reinforce the importance of feedback in maintaining quality. Setting clear coding standards and automating checks ensures accountability. A mentorship program fosters collaboration, guiding adherence to best practices.
-
I address it by having a one-on-one discussion to understand their perspective and emphasize the importance of maintaining code quality. I ensure everyone is aligned on clear coding standards and make the expectations explicit. If needed, I pair them with an experienced mentor to guide them through the review process. Additionally, I use review tools to highlight missed feedback and track changes. This approach fosters a collaborative environment while ensuring all contributions meet the required standards.
-
Nowadays, tools like GitHub help evaluate code quality and warn about vulnerabilities in it. However, this does not replace the need for a strong team culture, where members understand the importance of following minimum development standards. These standards help ensure scalability and reduce the risks of vulnerabilities. This is where the role of technical leaders becomes essential: not only to create these standards when they do not exist but also to guide the team in adopting them and promoting best development practices. A team that understands and values these standards will create more sustainable and secure projects.
-
1. Insist the importance of code reviews and its impact during 1-1 meetings. 2. Explain about scenarios when there wasn't a code review and how it proved to be damaging 3. Follow a practice of sharing metrics about the dev processes so that the team is aware of who's at best and who needs to catch up.
-
I will schedule meeting to discuss the situation in a non-confrontational manner and explain how code reviews are important for team collaboration and quality.
-
I think the answer is simple, sit down with them and ask why they are not following the provided feedback. They may have their reasons and perhaps they have something that works better or has advantages. You won't know until you sit down and chat. Maybe they didn't realize the feedback was obligatory and thought it was more of an option. Either way, if they still don't follow the feedback and improve then other discussions may need to happen.
-
When a team member consistently ignores code review feedback, it’s essential to address the issue constructively to maintain high standards. First, have a private, one-on-one conversation to understand their perspective and any challenges they might be facing. Clearly communicate the importance of code review in maintaining quality and aligning with best practices. Establish a feedback loop where the team member is encouraged to ask questions and seek clarification during the review process. Implement a tracking system for feedback to ensure accountability and follow-up on improvements. By fostering a culture of open communication and continuous learning, you can help ensure that everyone’s contributions meet the team’s standards.
-
First, ensure that your code review is clear and addresses the most relevant aspects of the code. If your feedback is still being overlooked, reach out to your team member to clarify your points and confirm that they understand your concerns. In such cases, it’s best to stop communicating asynchronously and opt for a video meeting or face-to-face conversation to discuss the feedback. Always be polite and professional!
Valorar este artículo
Lecturas más relevantes
-
Azure DevOps Server¿Cómo haces un seguimiento y mides el progreso y el rendimiento de tu equipo de XP en ADS?
-
Prácticas recomendadas en ingeniería de softwareEl equipo se divide durante una revisión de código. ¿Cómo los unirás?
-
Diseño de softwareTiene dificultades para dar su opinión sobre el código. ¿Cómo puedes hacerlo de manera constructiva?
-
Metodologías ágiles¿Cómo se pueden usar las iteraciones para implementar timeboxing en XP?