¿Qué hacer si los resultados de la investigación chocan con los intereses de la industria?

Noway. The research findings should be recorded and reported as they are. Your data could change the game. Honesty always works.

I strive for transparency, presenting findings objectively while emphasizing potential benefits for industry stakeholders. Seek common ground through open dialogue, highlighting areas of mutual interest and potential compromise. Collaborate with industry partners to find innovative solutions that align with both research findings and industry interests. Prioritize ethical considerations and long-term impacts to foster trust and collaboration. Ultimately, aim for win-win scenarios that balance research integrity with industry needs.

Nothing should be hidden from public access. The research findings and factors involved need to be considered by a panel of experts and if the findings are going to significantly affect the population in any way negatively , the industry should take appropriate measures.

Obviously, you have always to make sure of the results. Because no business may be based on wrong assumptions. Business interests can only be based on the best understanding of reality. The earliest you interiorize results and adapt the strategy, the best. Denial of “unwanted” results is one of the worse, and more damaging, mistakes in management. It is always helpful that final decisions, especially when they are difficult, are taken by somebody ho has some distance. People who are very involved in research tend to suffer “owner’s blindness”.

Firstly, I would say that contradictory research findings are not always a direct clash; rather it may be an exceptional finding pointing at any new trend, it can also be an example of a lack of sufficient data, bad quality work, miscommunication on perspectives of research output, and hence expectation mismatch. One can adopt one or a mix of steps as covered below: 1. Validate the hypothesis and research output (check sources, and logic put behind deriving/representing the data 2. The output has to be very well crafted as per the study objective/expectation of stakeholders. One can follow different frameworks to bring the story flow to findings, and give attention to details such as data representation, color codes, use of words, etc.

I saw this firsthand when serving as the Director of research in projects that were industry-sponsored. It was a tremendous source of conflict as negative findings were perceived to tarnish the image of the industrial institution. One thing I found useful was to negotiate and agree on data handling and reporting in an unbiased manner. And it took courage, willingness and environmental support to walk away from unethical data reporting practices such as hiding the negative results.

Los hallazgos de un estudio son hallazgos y punto. Hay que publicarlos como tal, aunque estos sean contrarios a nuestras hipótesis y desafíen el estado actual del conocimiento, de eso se trata la ciencia.

In my opinion, any research starts with an objective and the need for the research. If it's a non-clinical and clinical research involving animals and humans, research can be conducted only when the positive benefits overweigh the negative. Hence in these cases assessing the impact is very important. In other cases, where it's only laboratory research or observational research or other which involve no or minimal negative impacts, exploring the alternative would be a great idea along with the clear communication and integrity.

If research findings clash with industry interests, it's important to prioritize scientific integrity and ethical standards. This entails openly disclosing the findings, fostering dialogue with stakeholders, and evaluating potential impacts on public health and safety. Maintaining research integrity ensures decisions are driven by evidence-based principles, not commercial motives.

The principles of accountability and transparency are paramount in my work. It is essential to identify areas requiring improvement and devise a plan to address these challenges. Incorporating insights from our industry to enhance our future endeavors is crucial, following discussions with industry management. Implementing a tracking system will allow us to rectify mistakes promptly and gain insights into our progress compared to our improvement objectives. At the end, we all have mistakes but the success industries should learn and benefit from their mistakes and to get the customer's trust accordingly.

As the saying goes, "Figures don't lie, but liars figure". This quote is the major reason why double-checking the accuracy of how data was collected and how analysis was carried out is necessary.

🍁To verify the accuracy of your research findings, you can employ several methods: 🍂Rigorous Methodology: Ensure your research design adheres to established scientific principles and best practices in your field. This strengthens the foundation of your data and conclusions. 🍂Data Replication: If feasible, attempt to replicate your findings through follow-up studies or invite other researchers to do so. Confirmation from independent researchers bolsters the credibility of your work. 🍂Triangulation: In qualitative research, consider employing triangulation, where you corroborate your findings using multiple data collection methods. This enhances the richness and trustworthiness of your data.

It is always important to take a step back and acknowledge that our data can benefit from being cross-referenced with other scientific elements to achieve scientific accuracy. Accepting this allows us to enhance the robustness and reliability of our findings. Cross-referencing data with additional scientific insights helps to validate and strengthen conclusions, ensuring that our analysis is thorough and comprehensive. This approach fosters a more nuanced and holistic understanding of complex phenomena, promoting scientific integrity and advancing knowledge in our field.

In the field of biomimicry, it is essential to assess how research findings can influence the industry. By considering the broader context, including environmental and social dimensions, this approach offers the potential to introduce sustainable alternatives inspired by nature. These innovations have the power to transform our world by providing solutions that not only align with industry goals but also promote long-term environmental stewardship. By fostering a constructive dialogue, biomimicry can drive positive change, encouraging industries to adopt practices that benefit both innovation and the planet.

I will try to ensure that the research methods I have employed are right and findings/conclusions are practically significance. Practical significance is very important aspect of research work. If my finding is against industry and could not contributing to solving industrial problems, it will simply be waste of time.

Every research is an isolate but related with others. As a scientist, everybody must release their data. No research only could be present the FACT. It needs to verify with others, at the end industry must to trust them. Aim of industry is to help all people, not just Shareholders, we all are in one ship.

We are all humans (other than some AI bots) and can make mistakes. If your findings clash with industry interests, it's better to double check and review before publishing. If your research is solid and defensible, hopefully data is data and there is little room for multiple interpretations. If industry needs a change, the sooner the better.

In the face of conflict, it is crucial to thoroughly cross-check the whole research approach, including addition of the most recent data, then explore biases and limitations. Doing a background search on the industries' rationales for their strong opposition may improve validity and preparedness.

Verify, and reverify. Then publish! Facts are facts! Except there is a variable that was changed, and other factors that cannot be accounted for (which will be mentioned and discussed), PUBLISH!

Academic research is supreme. Industry has nothing to do to influence research findings. Manipulation of research findings is unethical. Unethical professional behaviour, if caught results in extreme consequences.

When working at the intersection of industry and research, particularly in fields such as the life sciences which rely on research to drive the business outcomes a conflict between research results and the desired business outcome can happen at any stage along the commercialization pathway. In this case the research results are critical and their accuracy is paramount. Any new discovery should be openly used to drive changes in business strategy as well as tweak scientific strategy moving forward. A result that is swept under the rug to prevent short term pain is much much worse long term for a business than addressing it as it arises.

🧠🔬Successful collaboration between fundamental research and industry in a biomimicry project, which leverages natural principles for innovation, is key to transformative outcomes. Fundamental research provides a robust foundation of biological knowledge, identifying biomimetic patterns for industrial application. Simultaneously, industry expertise in technology development translates these concepts into tangible solutions. Early industry engagement aligns goals and meets market needs. Ongoing communication fosters innovation by sharing ideas and resolving challenges. Ultimately, this shared commitment to effective, sustainable products upholds nature preservation, driving exciting new applications in industry and technology.

I would tap on "Verify Accuracy" to ensure the research findings are supported by the data. I'd review the methodology, double-check the statistical analyses, and compare the results with existing literature. I'd make sure that the research can withstand scrutiny and that the findings are presented transparently.

By engaging industry stakeholders researcher will be easily able to identify the reason behind clash and also able to take quick corrective actions which helps him to make his research industry relevant.

⭐️Engaging stakeholders is key to navigating research findings that contradict industry interests. Here are some steps you can take: ⚡️Proactive Communication: Initiate dialogue with industry representatives before publishing your findings. This fosters trust and openness to your research. ⚡️Tailored Communication: Frame your research in a way that resonates with industry concerns. Highlight potential benefits and areas for collaboration. ⚡️Seek Common Ground: Identify areas where your research aligns with industry interests. This can help bridge potential divides and encourage collaboration. ⚡️Transparency and Respect: Maintain transparency throughout the process. Actively listen to industry concerns and address them respectfully.

In my experience, stakeholder engagement has been the defining factor when a conflict of this sort happens. It is unlikely that you are the first person to ever have perceived a trend or reached a result, so why was that idea not advanced before? Were their premises right? Are your premises right? By understanding those factors, the research becomes stronger and so does your ability to achieve something meaningful with it.

Provide Education and Resources In addition to engaging stakeholders, offering educational sessions or resources about your research findings can be beneficial. Educating stakeholders about the science behind your findings and the implications for the industry can help demystify your work and reduce resistance. These sessions can be forums for discussion, Q&A, and brainstorming solutions that incorporate your findings into industry practices in a practical and sustainable way. Providing resources, such as summary reports, infographics, or webinars, can further aid in making your research accessible and understandable to non-experts, fostering a more informed dialogue.

Stakeholder engagement should not be underemphasized in research or studies that involve third-party interests, either from funders or industry involvement.

Let's all talk openly with researchers, folks from the industry, policymakers, and others involved. When we chat openly like this, it helps us have productive conversations and really think about all the different viewpoints.

☀️Communicating clearly is paramount when presenting research that may challenge industry interests. Here are some suggested strategies : ✨Tailor your language and presentation style to your audience's level of scientific expertise. Avoid jargon and explain complex concepts in an accessible way. ✨Clearly articulate the implications of your findings for industry stakeholders. Highlight potential benefits and applications. ✨Use compelling visuals like charts and graphs to present data effectively. Consider incorporating storytelling elements to make your research relatable and engaging. ✨Present your findings concisely and avoid overwhelming your audience with technical details. Focus on the key takeaways and their significance.

Preparing for my first TEDx talk made me realize the critical importance of scientific communication within the research community. Not only does it allow for the sharing of scientific discoveries with the world, but it also fosters collaboration, innovation, and collective understanding. To memorably reach their audience, scientific messages often require engaging communication tools such as humor and metaphors. The coaching I received taught me a fundamental rule: "you shouldn't aim to give YOUR presentation, but THEIR presentation." This means always keeping the audience in mind— their expectations, concerns, and interests. By focusing on the target audience, the speech is tailored and structured to maximize its impact and resonance.

Maintaining truthfulness and upholding integrity can build trust with others, enhance your reputation, and foster strong relationships. Over time, this can lead to opportunities, respect, and a positive impact on both personal and professional aspects of your life. People tend to gravitate towards those they can trust, which can open doors to new connections, collaborations, and success in various endeavors. Consistently demonstrating honesty and integrity builds a solid foundation for long-term growth and fulfillment.

It is imperative that insights and information gained from research are available to a wide audience. This is something easily achieved by tailoring the results/conclusions to be accessible to more than just industry experts. An excellent exercise I did in grad school was to take recently published scientific articles and create summary articles at a reading level suitable for 4th grade students. This exercise helped me understand that although as researchers we can sometimes become hyperfocused within our niche, it is in our best interest to help make our findings presentable to as many people as possible.

Clear and transparent communication is crucial. I ensure that the findings are presented in an understandable and accessible manner, highlighting both the potential benefits and risks.

Navigating conflicts between research findings and industry interests requires careful consideration, open and clear communication, in plain language and a commitment to upholding the integrity of the research process. This will provide evidence of the research findings to the stakeholders and the industry representatives as well.

When research findings clash with industry interests, a complex ethical dilemma arises, highlighting the tension between scientific integrity, public welfare, and corporate interests. In such situations, individuals and institutions must navigate a delicate balance between upholding the integrity of scientific inquiry and addressing the potential implications for industry stakeholders. Researchers, institutions, policymakers, and industry stakeholders must collaborate to ensure that research outcomes are accurately reported, transparently communicated, and ethically applied to promote the common good.

Mi trabajo de investigación es académico y su objetivo es crear conocimiento, esperando que éste sea útil para el entorno. Si una de las investigaciones en las que participo llegase a ser incómoda para la industria, con mayor razón los resultados tienen que ser comunicados clara y constructivamente para que la situación conflictiva pueda ser superada en el futuro.

Research is a valuable product in the field of science and academia. However, launching it effectively in the market is equally important as the product's quality. The success of research largely depends on how well it is communicated to the target audience. The communication strategy must be designed in a way that is informative, insightful, and relevant to the audience. It should not be provocative or misleading. By creating a tailor-made communication strategy, we can ensure research buy-in from the audience and attract more customers.

la comunicación clara y accesible, adaptada al público objetivo, junto con la disposición para escuchar y abordar las inquietudes, son elementos esenciales para establecer una relación de confianza y credibilidad al presentar investigaciones que puedan generar conflictos de intereses. La transparencia y la honestidad en la comunicación son pilares fundamentales para construir una base sólida de entendimiento y colaboración con la audiencia.

When given a research question, one should never bias the project with an answer in mind. Findings should simply be the findings. By considering alternatives from the start and throughout the research project, research can never be at odds with industry interests - it can only be what it is.

If research findings clash with industry interests, explore how biomimicry can offer solutions. Instead of adjusting results, suggest how nature-inspired innovations can help industries adapt and align with your conclusions. This approach shows a commitment to constructive problem-solving and future-oriented solutions !

💥Exploring alternatives is a valuable approach when research clashes with industry interests. Here's how you can navigate this: ☄️Brainstorm Solutions: Collaborate with researchers, industry stakeholders, and policymakers to brainstorm alternative solutions or approaches that address both the research findings and industry concerns. ☄️Pilot Studies: Consider conducting pilot studies to test the feasibility and effectiveness of alternative solutions in real-world settings. ☄️Identify Funding Opportunities: Seek funding opportunities to support the development and implementation of alternative solutions that align with your research findings.

Exploring alternatives is a crucial step when research findings clash with industry interests. Rather than compromising the integrity of your results, consider alternative solutions or recommendations that could address the concerns raised by your findings while still aligning with industry goals. This approach demonstrates a commitment to constructive dialogue and problem-solving. You can foster collaboration and facilitate positive change by offering feasible suggestions for how the industry could adapt or respond to your findings.

If research findings clash with industry interests, the ethical approach is to prioritise the research findings and scientific evidence over industry interests or profits. As a researcher, it is important to pursue truth and report accurate findings, even if those findings may be inconvenient or unfavourable to the industry. Also, preserving scientific integrity and protecting public interests should take precedence over private corporate interests or financial motives. Open and honest communication of research results is crucial, regardless of potential commercial impacts. However, it is important to find common grand and viable paths for constructive ways for the industry to adapt to research findings.

When faced with conflicting findings, I explore alternative solutions or recommendations that bridge gaps without altering results. This forward-thinking approach showcases constructive problem-solving and demonstrates a commitment to viable paths forward, fostering collaboration and progress.

Exploring alternatives to conflicting narratives or outcomes about one's industry or field of work is imperative. Again, this requires deep listening, deep reflection, and ultimately - meaningful learning. Being open to alternative action(s) is a decolonial move, as it compels one to appreciate that there is no Truth (with a capital 'T'). It also compels one to move away from 'dogmatic', linear thinking characteristic of 'epistemic deafness.'

I explore alternative solutions or compromises that may address the concerns of the industry while still honoring the integrity of the research findings.

Exploring alternatives where all sides have considerable positive results is very important, since every action generates a reaction.

When research findings clash with industry interests, exploring alternatives is crucial. One way to approach this is to conduct further research to validate or challenge the initial findings.Additionally, seeking input from a diverse group of experts, stakeholders, and industry professionals can offer different perspectives and potential solutions. Collaboration and brainstorming sessions can also help generate innovative ideas for addressing the conflict between research findings and industry interests. By exploring alternatives through research, collaboration, and diverse perspectives, you can work towards finding a balanced approach that considers both the research evidence and the industry's needs.

⭐️Maintaining integrity is paramount throughout the process of navigating research that clashes with industry interests. Here's how you can ensure ethical conduct: ⚡️Strive for objectivity in your research design, data analysis, and reporting. Avoid letting industry influence skew your interpretations. ⚡️Disclose any potential conflicts of interest upfront, such as funding sources or affiliations that could create bias. ⚡️Ensure all authors on your research publications meet authorship criteria and have made significant contributions to the work. ⚡️Follow the established ethical guidelines and regulations set forth by your research institution and relevant professional bodies.

It is simple: Never compromise on integrity. A key experience I have is to anticipate potential conflicts of interest very clearly in the design phase. Not to change the research, but to ensure optimal planned involvement of stakeholders in the research process. Involving all relevant stakeholders with a stake in your work in a transparent, ethical, appropriate and ideally collaborative way in the design process can help identify important “blind spots” in the research design that will further strengthen the integrity, value and acceptability of your research outputs. So integrity starts with demonstrating a clear intent towards integrity from the outset of the research.

Always uphold strong academic standards when facing conflicting industry interests. Make sure your research is unbiased and done using rigorous methods. It's important to be transparent and accurate when sharing your findings, so people trust your work. Stand firm in defending the independence and credibility of your research. Remember, the goal is to contribute to knowledge in a way that benefits society.

If the data accurately supports the research findings, it is important to publish it. The integrity of research in general, requires that. To not publish it, because data conflicts with general industry findings, is irresponsible. The research may be critical to evolve industry trends.

Integrity in research is most important and interests of the industry should not interfere with any meaningful findings. The only way to push an industry forward is to challenge old ideas and interests. .

Upholding ethical standards and professional integrity, especially when research findings might challenge existing industry practices, is non-negotiable for me. My dedication to objectivity and transparency in discussing the integration of AI into tax law exemplifies my commitment to ethical research and reporting.

Next to the scientific expertise in the respective field, integrity is probably (going to be) one of the most important assets in science. Science and economy often come as a bundle -  a lot of research is funded by stakeholders with economic interests, which often exceed the striving for innovation. What to do when your findings are not aligned with these expectations? Be strong, show confidence in your findings and reach out for fellow researchers and regulatory institutions! Especially in times of global tensions, science is likely to be instrumentalized; history provides many examples of this. It is in these times, in the times to come, that taking a stance as a united front is going to be crucial  - and powerful.

With the agreement of the stakeholder, one suggested way to preserve integrity is to register a preprint with an embargo in collaboration with the industry partner. This allows you to preserve integrity and work forward with balance of both academic and industry expectations.

In my experience, my thought and measurements have determined never before knowledge, understanding and applications of stable isotopes for altering properties of a classical compound. By such biomolecules are possibly not just biomolecules if bacteria, protist, viruses, fungi, insects, plants and animals enrich biomolecules with different stable isotopic patterns of 2H, 13C, 15N, 17O, 18O, 25Mg 33S, and 34S so that the proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, nucleic acids and other molecules behave differently under metabolic conditions as measured by scientific method. By sound theory such differences have been rationalized. Thereby I had to exhibit my integrity, excellence in work and love of humanity by alarming caution to such biotechnology

Your research finding contradicts industry interests! Sometimes, we tend to understand Industry in a narrow sense. When we think of the Industry, we think of investors or the company chairman or founder! We do not think of workers, value chain members, or community living around the factories or even customers. Now redefine the way you define industry. Now see whether your findings are against the interest of industry? If still yes, the reflect whose interest it benefits? Who are they to the industry? Irrespective, what is important is to redefine based on impending paradigmatic shift that your finding is aiming at!

A key question is "which industry's interest"? Years ago many companies were not receptive to research supporting CSR or sustainability. But "leading edge" firms were open to it and eager to learn. As others have said, don't compromise your integrity or slant your interpretations of data in the face of objections or resistance. But do listen to critics. This can help hone your recommendations for practice. Reach out to an interested audience with summaries of your research and blog/podcast with that audience in mind. If in academe, become an engaged scholar!

Especially in biomimicry, maintaining research integrity is crucial. Nature-inspired innovations depend on accurate, ethical research to drive sustainable solutions. It's essential to uphold scientific rigor without falling into poetry at the expense of facts, as compromising these standards risks undermining both the credibility of the findings and their potential to transform industries.

🔥In addition to the above, here are some other important considerations when navigating research that clashes with industry interests: 💥Long-Term Impact: Consider the long-term societal and environmental implications of your research findings, alongside potential industry concerns. 💥Public Discourse: If industry resistance is significant, consider engaging in public discourse to raise awareness about your findings and their importance. 💥Seek Support: Don't hesitate to seek support from mentors, colleagues, or professional organizations if you face pressure to compromise your research integrity.

Why your research findings should match Industry interest? If you are working on how tobacco industry interfere in policy making and implementation, then it is opposite to their interest. Research on Commercial Detrminents of health (CDoH) is most of the time against industry interest. Someone working on alcohol, tobacco, gambling, oil industry research always experience this.

Here are some steps research’s should consider taking: 1. Transparency: Researchers should be transparent about their findings & conflicts of interest. 2. Peer review: Researchers can submit their work for peer review to ensure that it meets scientific standards and is not unduly influenced by industry interests. 3. Collaboration: Researchers can collaborate with industry partners in a transparent and ethical manner to ensure that their work remains independent 4. Advocacy: Researchers can advocate for policies and practices that promote transparency, integrity, and independence in research. 5. Ethical considerations: Researchers should consider the ethical implications of their work and strive to prioritize the public interest.

When my research finding clashes with industry expectations, I would like to retrospect on my initial analysis. There are 2 possibilities here : 1. I have rework my course of actions to correct the research. 2. The clash with industry expectations can also be taken as an opportunity to develop new findings that impacts a wider arena. Both options have to be properly retrospected.

The best way forward in such circumstances is to assess the impact of the differences and give a transparent assessment to the clients and industry players. We have dealt with such situations in times of ENA GST implications, in times of BIS notifications, overnight changes in customs rates and the like. The ideal situation which has blessed us and helped our Clients: 1. Assessment of market 2. Assessment of economic depletion and exposure 3. Doing a complete due diligence of status of other industry players 4. If there is an association, approaching the government / ministry with representation and meetings and finding an amiable timeline to help the industry be statutorily complaint. At no point in time should integrity be compromised.

I use the support of scietific findings to change and to give orientation to new industries policies...After all this is the role of a scientific, including in legal and social sciences sectors

Given the rapid advancements in AI technology and its applications, at Blue J we understand it's imperative to stay vigilant regarding the ethical, legal, and social implications of these developments. We are keenly aware of the need to continuously monitor future progress and be prepared to adjust our approaches in response to new insights or challenges. Moreover, advocating for a culture of lifelong learning among tax professionals ensures that the workforce remains capable of leveraging AI in a responsible and effective manner.