¿Cómo puede aprovechar al máximo los comentarios de las partes interesadas?

Important feedbacks should with a clear vision but open mind. This needs to figure out a stakeholder who’s unbiased and can communicate to you freely. In professional environment this may be a combined discussion with key stakeholders. Most importantly for simple communications concise message can help than a 20 party call. For process flow walkthrough multi party call with clarity on RACI will be helpful. For Areas which needs longer work there should be milestones check.

Any project starting without KPIs or specific goals is bound to fail. Clear and concise goals establish the process. And a process leads to implementation. That's the key here!

Don't design your goals in order to confirm your existing beliefs. If you genuinely want to improve your service you need to open up to constructive criticism in all areas and be prepared to listen with an open mind.

We aimed to revamp our mobile app interface to enhance user experience. Before seeking stakeholder feedback, we outlined specific objectives: pinpoint pain points in the current UI, identify desired features, and understand user expectations. This clarity guided our feedback collection process and steered us toward actionable insights for improvement.

Challenge lies in balancing complexity & clarity, a risk of overwhelming the audience, hindering comprehension. Other key issue is the potential misinterpretation of visual elements, emphasizing importance of clear standardized data representation. Data accuracy and reliability are perpetual concerns, demanding vigilant validation processes to maintain the integrity of visualized information. And effective storytelling through data remains a challenge, as the narrative must resonate with stakeholders. Addressing these challenges necessitates a strategic approach, incorporating user feedback, embracing simplicity without sacrificing depth, & leveraging innovative techniques to enhance the interpretability and impact of data visualizations.

Loosely qualitative defined goals should be the top of your evaluation/decision tree. Then add in simple metrics. This helps stop being closed minded about feedback especially when under self-pressure. An example might go: "we want to interact/listen to our customers". Then split that down as 100% of them when onboarding. 50% when they renew. 74% when they decide to leave you. Then have questions below that to answer.

Feedback comes out of individual's experience, unbiased experiences should be taken positively and one must consider it to take action immediate. Doing this will prevent replicating same mistake in future. Goal can defined as performance of product and service I strongly disagree with people who ask to makes changes at every level in one shot. Instead take the most common poor experience first and kill it one by one.

You must be imaginative with stakeholder’s feedback. Promote open dialogue where everyone can contribute. Get several viewpoints using polls. Methodically review the comments for new ideas. Use this data to make user-friendly modifications. Encourage collaboration in an environment where everyone feels important and involved.

Maximizing the value of stakeholder feedback involves a strategic and comprehensive approach. Begin by setting clear objectives for feedback collection, identifying key stakeholders, and selecting appropriate methods tailored to your goals. Create a safe and open environment to encourage candid input using qualitative and quantitative data. Seek feedback regularly to ensure timeliness and relevance, asking open-ended questions to extract detailed insights. Act on feedback to build trust and communicate results transparently. Embrace continuous improvement, follow up after implementing changes, and provide training to empower stakeholders. This approach creates a dynamic feedback loop and drives meaningful change within an organization.

To maximize the value of stakeholder feedback, create a purpose-driven feedback process. Clearly define objectives, prioritize key stakeholders, and employ a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods. Foster an open and safe environment, asking specific, actionable questions. Actively listen, acknowledge, and appreciate input. Prioritize feedback based on impact, implement changes transparently, and communicate results. Iterate based on ongoing insights, document feedback systematically, and integrate it into decision-making. Valuing stakeholder perspectives, encouraging continuous improvement, and being responsive yields important insights and trust and collaboration for project success.

During a website redesign initiative, we utilized a mix of methods to gather stakeholder feedback. We ran surveys to gather broad opinions, conducted in-depth interviews with key users for detailed insights, and monitored social media for ongoing sentiment. This diversified approach provided us with comprehensive feedback for better decision-making.

In my opinion, interviews are the best method of collecting feedback if undertaken. The interviewers must be trained to conduct conversations and not just getting answers to the questionnaire. Open ended questions work the best. A heart to heart talk with the interviewee opens up doors for improvements too.

Real-time Feedback: Implement mechanisms for real-time feedback, such as in-app feedback forms or quick polls. This can capture immediate reactions and experiences while they're fresh in stakeholders' minds. Segmentation: Tailor your feedback collection based on stakeholder segments. Different user groups may have unique perspectives, so customize your approach to their specific needs and expectations. Continuous Listening: Establish ongoing channels for feedback rather than relying solely on periodic surveys. This creates a culture of continuous improvement and shows stakeholders that their input is valued consistently.

I am not for any general feedback. I want to be very specific and objective. There is absolutely no benefit of going general here. My focus would be a very targeted audience .

We have two formats to chose from: 1- Structured, formal and defined or 2- Chaotic. 1 is good for tracking a state of play over time. Its consistent relatively cheap and the graph says it all.It has the risk of becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. 2- is good for deeper insights as well as checking 1 is accurate. By chaotic I mean sales calls, exhibition stands, conference feedback, lift conversations, press/media and such.

One could choose different modes/channel to collect data depending upon the given timeline, my recommendation is to collect data not only for external stakeholders but also consider taking it from internal stakeholders to understand the gap better in a holistic way.

In a recent customer satisfaction campaign, we employed sentiment analysis on feedback data from various touchpoints. This method helped uncover patterns in user sentiments, highlighting recurring themes such as navigation challenges and desired feature enhancements. It enabled us to prioritize our action plan effectively.

Data is the key here. However, I would like to validate the quality of data first. Visualization and extracting trends is the essential part of any data analysis process.

According to me, Data filtration and sorting it based on your objective, decentralizing and classifying data will plays a vital before you analyse the data and give it a form for presentation and interpretation.

One thing I found helpful was the clear structure of the presentation, making it easy to grasp the key information. I disagree with the current delivery times for products being too long, as this could impact customer satisfaction. An example that caught my attention is the intuitive user interface of the application, facilitating navigation through the features and enhancing the overall experience.

Following a product launch, we received feedback indicating glitches in the app's payment process. Acting swiftly, our team addressed these issues by rolling out an update within a short time frame. We communicated these changes transparently to users, showcasing our responsiveness and dedication to their feedback.

Feedback helps in improvements. Unless an improvement plan is in place, simply getting feedback, analyzing data and trends would be of no use. Actions are essential!

Be open about your feedback. Look for the common threads if you have a lot of feedback. If you can arrange it with metrics, a graph or network map is a good way of seeing into instead of reading/ interpreting. Especially so if you have a lot of feedback comming all the time. Remember, we all have good and bad days and a feedback survey can be a good way of letting of steam. Remember we are all much better at making sense of data than we give ourselves credit for.

Understanding the cause and repercussions to any action must be given both sentimental and logical thoughts before taking action on feedback, such action may back fire even worse then the present.

Taking action on feedback is crucial for the success of your internet service project. It involves using feedback analysis results to make changes, prioritize actions based on urgency and impact, and communicate these changes to stakeholders. Express appreciation for stakeholders' input, fostering a positive relationship. Accountability ensures effective implementation, with ongoing monitoring for further refinement. This responsive approach builds a culture of continuous improvement, encouraging ongoing feedback. Communicate outcomes to showcase the tangible impact of stakeholder input, fostering a collaborative and user-centric environment.

After concluding a project where we gathered employee feedback on workplace culture, we conducted a post-feedback review. We found that while we collected substantial insights, there were areas where feedback channels could have been more accessible. This evaluation led us to enhance our feedback collection methods for future initiatives.

Evaluating feedback process is always convincing, it just only empower the responders but also they tend to be more associated with the cause and opportunity cost associated with the feedback

Reflecting on your feedback process is essential for refinement. Assess if goals were achieved, if feedback collected was relevant, and if data analysis was accurate. Review the timeliness and appropriateness of actions taken. Evaluate the clarity and persuasiveness of your communication regarding implemented changes. Seek feedback on the feedback process itself, learn from it, and implement improvements for future cycles. This reflective practice ensures an evolving and effective feedback system.

I would say that the selection of audience is of utmost importance. Secondly, structuring the feedback process, it should be aligned towards overall goals. We must know what we want to achieve of this activity!

I once encountered a scenario where initial feedback didn't align with the end-users' actual needs. It taught us the importance of ongoing engagement and continuous feedback loops rather than one-time data collection for accurate insights into stakeholders' evolving expectations and preferences.