¿Cómo puede equilibrar la garantía de calidad y la velocidad?

QA Balancing and speed is a challenge, Prioritizing testing can help us to manage our expectations and communicate progress and results to our stakeholders. Overcome 'Pesticide Paradox' testing by reviewing test cases on a regular basis. Agile methods can help us speed up QA by reducing the scope and complexity of each iteration, enabling faster testing and validation, and facilitating collaboration and communication among developers, testers, and customers. use automation wisely to deliver high-quality software efficiently. It's a constant effort, but we're committed to finding the right balance.

In my experience I have always practiced the following to balance QA and speed: Overcome 'Pesticide Paradox' testing by reviewing test cases on a regular basis. Change the Test execution methodology by rotating within team members. Document thoroughly the most vulnerable defect prone areas so that the next QA person executing can focus on testing. Escalate any roadblocks immediately and resolve it as a team(doesn't matter what SDLC you are following)

Balancing quality assurance and speed in software development involves prioritizing risk assessment, adopting Agile principles, and employing efficient testing practices. This includes test data management, automation, and code reviews. Continuous feedback and improvement are crucial for addressing quality issues promptly.

Distinguish between Priority and Severity. Is the improvement worth the impact? Impact to users and impact to the development team. Understand value of product to customers and stakeholders.

While using Quality Analysis make sure you don't miss the important checkpoints when users move to the next iterations . Even though everyone is responsible for ensuring quality QA should assign himself/herself a task to recheck the crucial tasks while finishing the phases.

Here I would like to add that, spend some initial time on risk management after the user needs are captured. This will chart out mitigation means needs to be provided, this is will save some time. Also, I have observed that maniere times teammates are not clear about how hazard, hazardous situations and harms are interconnected and also some testing integrations. It is advisable to spend some time on understanding these terms before kick-starting any project. Though we may know these things, but different projects need different thought processes. So, always spend some time in thinking about all the QA stuff in context to the anticipated project. This will save a lot pf time in future.

Optimizing Quality Assurance and speed can be achieved by embracing agile methodologies like Scrum. Scrum facilitates the accelerated development of products while upholding quality. Through the establishment of sprint timelines, the quality team and stakeholders are afforded the necessary time to complete each sprint, ensuring comprehensive testing and assurance. Additionally, the planning and goal-setting process empowers the team to efficiently address essential tasks within each sprint. Over time, this approach cultivates enhanced teamwork and efficiency, ultimately leading to increased productivity.

Bullet-proof your processes as much as possible. If it's physically not possible to make an error, you can proceed more quickly!

Balancing Quality Assurance and speed involves adopting agile practices, leveraging automated testing, and prioritizing critical test cases. Focusing on early defect detection and continuous integration helps mitigate risks while maintaining development velocity, ensuring high-quality deliverables without compromising speed. Effective communication and collaboration within the team are also essential for success.

In service-based organizations, striking a balance between speed and quality assurance is a continuous process that calls for regular monitoring and modification as well. Finding the ideal balance is crucial to maintaining both consumer satisfaction and competitiveness. To satisfy the changing needs of the clients and market, evaluate your procedures on a regular basis, get input, and modify your plans as necessary.

By not taking drugs in the first place and having a long happy life. Then going out there and smashing all your testing like a boss!

Caso esteja com pouca agenda disponível, automatize PRIMEIRO os testes de integração e regressão. Automatizar testes é apenas uma tarefa de todo o universo do QA, porém já tem atingido pelo menos 40%-50% da carga horária do profissional. De qualquer forma, o teste manual deve ser exigido, pois sabemos que o robô e os testes automatizados falham(é, bem vindo), portanto check manual e rápido é indispensável.

Automatic Call Distribution System reports may provide Calls answered, Average Talk Time, Abandoned Calls or Blocked Calls. Average Speed of Answer. If Talk Time is too short it may be call transferred or disrupted

There is no way to have speed without test automation. There is no big and complex product that has a good quality, success in the market, without test automation. Manual testing is an impediment to increase quality and speed in the QA tasks.

Automation plays a vital role in reducing the time to market. However, it is important to have thorough knowledge about the application under test. Other important aspect is decision about what to automate, 100% automation is impossible. Without proper planning, it may backfire and turn out costly. There should be a balance between automation and testing and priority should be given to businesses critical flows. It is also important to understand that automation is not a replacement of testing, both go hand in hand. There are certain aspects of the application that always need human eye and exploration.

Getting the right tools for each section of the job is important. Even the smallest part of the whole getting slowed down, can affect the overall quality and speed of QA. Industry standard tools like JIRA for ticket tracking, Confluence for documentation, Datadog for automated testing, Testrail for test case creation, etc. Learn what is important, or be prepared to be flexible and estimated workload quite often.

As QAs, we should be able to use the most appropriate testing tools and technologies for the software testing. Most of the tools and technologies reduces the manual actions and they reduces the time wasting and the efforts which we put on them. Not only that but also we can prioritize the testing based on the priorities with Business Requirements.

If possible, it's really beneficial to have a person part of the development team, who is a professional tester, preferably specialised (at least as a tester) within the specific tools the team is developing. Such a tester is always available for testing, and has (or will soon acquire) a deep knowledge of as-is contra to-be and thus quickly understands what test cases to prioritise, depending on the change, and what is crucial in the regression testing. Such a tester is highly beneficial for both the developers and the business, since s/he will in time know all the ins and outs of the application. That person can also be the owner of the test scripts.

While you can acquire a knack for understanding what features and bugs are a priority to test and address, there will always be times when you need to communicate with clients or developers in order to understand when parts of the product or service are expected to be delivered, and what bugs are going to block progress. It's best to assume al bugs will be fixed, even if their estimated fix time is far into the future. Everything is big picture, so we have to remember that timelines, deadlines, requirements and restrictions control the flow of the work.

Os cenários de SUCESSO da nova release devem ser priorizados, pois se fundamentalmente eles falharam, qual foi o valor desta entrega? O que não esquecer: - Testes regressivos sempre serão exigidos QA. O que adianta subir uma nova release e o restante parar de funcionar?

Prioritizing Testing Efforts focuses on ensuring that the most critical aspects of an application receive immediate attention. By employing risk-based testing, teams can identify high-risk areas that are more likely to fail or have significant user impact, allowing them to allocate resources effectively. Additionally, test case prioritization helps in executing high-impact tests first, ensuring essential functionalities are verified promptly. This strategy not only optimizes testing time but also enhances overall quality, enabling teams to deliver a stable product faster. By addressing critical areas early, teams can mitigate risks and respond quickly to issues that arise.

By recognizing your strengths and shortcomings and taking appropriate action to rectify them, learning from feedback can help you enhance your quality assurance process. You can get feedback from a number of people, including your supervisors, users, consumers, and personal observations. Feedback can also address a range of QA topics, including the caliber of your offerings, the efficiency of your workflow, and the contentment of your stakeholders. But we should always keep in mind that not all criticism is going to be applicable, precise, or beneficial.

User feedbacks are the most important feedbacks you'll receive. listen to their feedback, learn what's needed in order to enhance your product quality, and always suggest new things to improve. Try to have feedbacks also internally with other departments, their feedback can be useful as well

In my experience, lengthy and resource-heavy QA practices are indicative of inefficiencies upstream. Make sure that the user story is as lightweight as realistically possible, has clear scope, and that everybody understands that scope. Your testing process won’t find every bug, no matter how many gates you have. As alluded to in other responses here, try to have a robust and lightweight automation framework combined with manual exploratory/smoke/sanity testing. Try to consider the 80/20 rule for both; work smarter not harder.

Best advice is to get familiar with the product you are testing. Learn key areas (every product has a core code that controls most of the features) and prioritize them first. Get familiar with product flaws and most vulnerable points. Whether you test manually or run automation, testing cannot be simply ‘done faster’ but you can give faster feedback on overall quality if you focus on the most important areas first.

Balancing quality assurance and speed involves clear standards, task prioritization, automation, cross-functional collaboration, agile methodologies, continuous training, risk analysis, strategic test automation, CI/CD implementation, and data-driven insights.

In order to get things done quicker and with the best possible quality, I've implemented the "Affected Area" process which covers only the places where the code changes applied, and trying to automate the rest of the test cases which wasn't affected. This can help you release versions sooner, with the right content and without manual efforts.

The best way to balance the quality is to have bi-directional traceability/coverage and layers of test automation. The development team together with the product owner should work together to establish the coverage of the requirements, on different test levels. Once this is achieved, we proceed with test automation. The key to balance is the speed of pushing and testing your build to the desired environment. You should never neglect the importance of exploratory testing as well as acceptance testing, but confidence must be built through the pipeline.

Perhaps some tests can complement each other instead to be seprate phases. As example when you do functional test you may on the same time capture performance issues. Or when you do functional test you may capture integration issues,

Based on experience in multiple projects and positions, the saying "slow is smooth and smooth is fast" is very true when it comes to software quality. You can rush a product and get it in the market sooner but risk poor quality and success. On the other hand, if you focus on perfection, the product will never launch. QA is the blend of two, where quality and speed to market match in harmony.

In a service-based setting, some below mentioned tactics can be used to strike this balance additionally: 1. Predict demand precisely as both understaffing and overstaffing may cause problems with speed or quality. 2. Promote a culture of continuous improvement wherein staff members are motivated to spot and resolve inefficiencies in the provision of services. 3. Effectively manage client expectations by expressing any delays or issues in advance and in a clear and concise manner so that there are realistic service delivery timelines. 4. Establish quality control checkpoints in service processes to identify and resolve problems early. 5. Motivate your group to come up with creative ways to boost both speed and quality, at the same time.

In every phase if you are checking the quality of the product the end product will be delivered on time. Proper estimation of the project that includes testing will give the quality product with speed at the end.