¿Cómo documenta y reporta los defectos y comentarios de las pruebas del sistema?

Defining the scope and objectives is the cornerstone of an effective testing strategy. The entire testing process hinges on these definitions, determining essential factors such as the range of devices to be tested, the appropriate testing environments, and the necessary resources. Clearly establishing the scope ensures a comprehensive and focused approach, making it the primary and most critical aspect of the testing process.

In my job, quality is lots of tests and verification just to maintain and control the outcome of system development. It takes lots of checks and balance and team effort.

To properly develop processes while evaluating a mechanical system, explicitly specify the test objectives ahead. Through risk analysis, document component functions and anticipate failure scenarios. Create test cases to collect quantitative performance data over a wide range of operational conditions. Organise report highlights logically, summarising keytakeaways pertaining to reliability, safety, and maintenance requirements. For failure models, degradation trends, and recommendations, consult the comprehensive appendices. Concise documentation indicates comprehensive attentiveness, allowing informed judgements on design modifications to be made for optimal system robustness throughout lifecycles.

During system testing, defects and feedback are systematically documented and reported to ensure effective communication and resolution. Testers use dedicated defect tracking tools to log issues, providing detailed information on the problem, steps to reproduce, and severity. Screenshots or recordings may accompany the reports for clarity. Each defect is assigned a unique identifier for easy reference. Testers collaborate with developers to address and resolve the issues, and the status of each defect is regularly updated. A comprehensive test summary report is generated to provide stakeholders with an overview of testing results, including a detailed account of defects, their resolutions, and any additional feedback for improvement.

It’s like setting the foundation—without it, the entire effort can become scattered and ineffective. By clearly identifying what features to test, the scenarios you'll run, and the tools you'll use, you're not just ensuring thorough coverage but also creating a focused roadmap.

Prepare for system testing like a pro! Before diving in, let's set the stage. Think of yourself as the captain of a ship charting a course. Define the scope: features, scenarios, tools, and metrics. Just as a captain plans the voyage, you set the roadmap for testing success. With clear objectives, navigate the sea of possibilities. It's time to embark on your epic testing voyage!

When preparing test data, it should be unique to each team for several reasons. Every test case has specific preconditions, and the test data should be tailored accordingly. If another team uses the same test data, the intended team may have to reset those preconditions, resulting in redundant work. Additionally, unique test data makes it easier to identify which team or vendor is responsible if any issues arise, streamlining troubleshooting and accountability.

Let's gear up for system testing! Now, as I take the helm, it's time to prep the test data and scripts. Test data fuels our testing engine, simulating real-world scenarios. And our test scripts? They're our trusty roadmap through the journey. We've got options galore: data masking, extraction, validation, and test automation. Like a conductor, I'll orchestrate each element to perfection. Armed with the right tools, we'll dive into testing, uncovering insights and ensuring system quality. Let's make magic happen!

The first step in choosing the appropriate methods and tools is identifying your testing requirements. This can include the type of data you need to test, the volume of data, and the formats in which the data needs to be generated and managed. When evaluating the available options, it's essential to consider their cost and scalability. Look for tools that can be customized to meet your specific testing requirements and are easy to use.

Executing every testcases everytime is not a wise decision. Firstly you should understand what are all the new features and whats the impact of these features in existing applications. So focus more on those impact areas. For example, if the new change and bug fixes are in Payment screen, there is no point in executing login scenarios in-depth. And this planning saves time.

At work, I execute test cases and scenarios methodically. With prepared data and scripts, I conduct tests using manual, automated, and exploratory techniques. Following the test plan and schedule closely, I ensure consistency, whether it's regression testing or exploring new scenarios. Throughout execution, I monitor and record outcomes meticulously, documenting pass/fail statuses and any errors or exceptions for analysis.

When document or reporting defects during testing the key is be very specific. The more information the better. Include specific steps for recreating the issue that has been found, don't leave anything out. Include logs and screenshots with you documentation. If possible leave the environment as is so Dev can take a look at it, in its current state.

A proper defect Defect report should have the following information as a bare minimum to help support the investigation of the issue. The structure is an indicative one that can be customised for the organization's/project's specific needs and processes. 1. Defect ID 2. Defect Summary 3. Status 4. Creation Date 5. Assignee 6. Detected By 7. Module/Feature 8. Description 9. Steps to Reproduce 10. Defect Severity: Critical/Major/Minor 11. Defect Priority: High/Medium/Low 12. Test Environment 13. Test Data 14. Expected Result 15. Actual Result 16. Comments Ensure that the defect report contains logs, screenshots, a brief video illustrating the issue, and the date and timestamp of the issue to help quicker resolution.

Effective defect reporting is crucial for swift bug resolution. Defect reporting should include a unique title, detailed test conditions, reproducible steps, and actual vs. expected results. Details such as the test environment, data used, and relevant attachments should be included for clarity. Prioritizing the defect's impact, severity, and urgency is essential for proper triage. Example in Azure DevOps: Title: Login Button Unresponsive on Settings Page Reproduce Steps: Navigate to Settings, click Login. Actual vs. Expected Results: Button does not respond (Actual) vs. Login form appears (Expected). Environment: Windows 10, Browser Version 86.0.4240.75 Attachments: Screenshot.png Defect should be regularly tracked for progress.

One of my favorite tasks is documenting and reporting defects and feedback during system testing. Defects represent deviations from expected system behavior, while feedback provides insights into system quality and usability. I meticulously document and report using standardized formats and tools like defect tracking software or bug report templates. Including relevant details and evidence ensures accurate reporting for further analysis and improvement.

Before documenting a defect, you should ensure that it can be reproduced. This will help to ensure that it`s accurately reported and can be resolved. Assigning defects a severity level based on their impact is also a necessary step. This practice aids the development team in prioritizing and resolving critical issues first, which is of utmost importance.

Regular and meticulously planned defect triage sessions in collaboration with cross-functional teams, play a pivotal role in the prioritisation and categorisation of the defects, which help to effectively communicate with teammates and stakeholders. A thorough review of defect details should be conducted during these sessions to ensure absolute clarity regarding the nature and location of the issues, thus identifying the right PoC / team as the assignee. The priority and severity levels of the defects should be discussed and agreed upon in the session in alignment with the impact of the defect on customers. Representation and expert views from business stakeholders should also be considered in prioritizing the defects.

When it comes to system testing, teamwork is key! You need to talk and work together with different people involved, like developers, managers, clients, and users. Keep them in the loop from start to finish: share your test results, any problems you find, and ideas for making things better. Don't forget to listen to their thoughts and sort out any issues that come up along the way. It's all about staying on the same page and working towards common goals.

After system testing, it's crucial to review and evaluate the process. Analyzing the effectiveness, strengths, and areas for improvement helps refine testing strategies. Comparing actual results with expected ones assesses system quality and functionality. Using defined criteria like defect density, resolution rate, test coverage, execution time, and user satisfaction provides a structured approach to measure success and pinpoint deficiencies. This thorough evaluation not only enhances future testing cycles but also ensures a robust final product.