Comment pouvez-vous utiliser le flux pour organiser vos arguments dans un débat politique ?

The concept of the flow in an argument is really an update of strategies found in classical rhetoric. To have a stepping stone argument can be reductive and in a way counterproductive. Rather than naming those in an argument "opponents" it is best to see them as an audience. Bearing in mind that to persuade an audience there must be a reward or benefit, it is best to allow them to develop their argument, first and go with the flow, gently modifying your argument to take on board their thoughts, and use this to gently nudge them toward what would be a mutually beneficial goal. In other words your opponents are in fact stakeholders or quasi team members. Go with their flow - that does not mean the logical stepping stone approach.

Dentro de los debates en el ámbito político, sí, el flujo es importante, pero no determinante, las estrategias de comunicación que cada candidata o candidato desea implementar debe ser pensado en la audiencia, más que en la o el contrincante, imaginemos que para un cargo público se postulan más de 5 personas, sin duda, el flujo debe ser constante y controlado, de otro modo, se pierde la lógica, conexión e impacto en el mensaje. Qué mejor que quien se encuentre en este escenario cuente con el apoyo de especialistas en comunicación política y oratoria, por citar algunos.

The flow is the initial step of almost every action we take in organization. Whether it’s planned out, or unintentional, we’re inclined to put things in order and in certain categories when we approach others. Hence it’s vital to be able to create a flow that would keep the debate or any interaction as subtle and effective as possible. By understanding the significance of the flow, you bring a strong foundation to the context, as well as herding the unnecessary or overlapping subjects within a debate.

For me flow is, when I am totally one with my task and my mind and my spirit, this perfect symbiosis when just doing it right. Feeling that unity and spirit is essential for all of our well- being and reaching our goals. A blessed and healthy true New Year <3

Identify the NEEDS of the debate and separate the WANTS of the participants Resulting in no clashes (and no Paradoxes), only compromise Resulting in no need to have the debate in the first instance ☺️

Introduction and Framework: Clearly state your stance and establish the evaluation criteria. Contentions: Break down your case into main arguments with clear labels. Subpoints and Evidence: Support each contention with evidence or examples. Cross-Applications: Reference opponent arguments and explain how your case responds. Rebuttals: Address opponent points directly, pointing out flaws and providing counter-evidence. Impact Analysis: Analyze the importance and implications of your arguments. Extend and Clash: Revisit key arguments, emphasizing their significance. Conclusion: Summarize main points and reinforce why your case is stronger. Using this concise flow ensures a well-organized and persuasive presentation.

The prepared flow helps you to be structured and direct to the point. You don't need to be confused and to lose time in turbulent waters.

El flujo no solo es necesario en el debate político, sino en cualquier tipo de argumentación. Éste nos permite organizar nuestras ideas, sustentar nuestros argumentos y presentar en el momento idóneo, las evidencias que sean pertinentes para respaldar nuestra posición. No obstante, tenemos que tener en cuenta que hay algunas habilidades que no están contempladas en el flujo, que son la creatividad, la improvisación y la espontaneidad. Sin embargo, ello no quiere decir que no podamos desarrollarlas y por el contrario, el flujo nos permite prever diversos supuestos que puedan generarse en el desarrollo del debate. En ese sentido, practicar el flujo varias veces ayudará a incrementar progreso de tales competencias.

By using the flow to organize arguments in a policy debate, one can improve clarity, consistency, and persuasiveness. One can also avoid dropping arguments, missing responses, or repeating arguments. One can also show judge that you are following the round and that you have a clear vision of how to win the round.

In my Experience, one think I learnt is do the opposite of what a regular people tell us to do. Its aint counter act its a different act. To me, Motivation is a junk food. You read, listen and then do as you wish, the one you do could be even Creative and Innovative, you bring in the uniqueness what you have in you. Thank you

The best tool to discover the current flow of a team's deliveries is definitely a Kanban Board, you leave the theoretical plan and schematic flowcharts and access the concrete reality of the team. The Board and its flow are built by the team that actually makes the deliveries, so it is real and highlights bottlenecks quickly, leading to continuous improvement, the basis of the Kanban method.

La síntesis de los argumentos y la claridad de las ideas son indispensables, imprescindibles al momento de emitir las ideas, pues si el flujo es importante, el contar con el documento (guion) de la participación siempre ayuda a evitar distracciones, ideas vagas e impacto del mensaje nulo. Además, permite enfocar la participación y lograr el objetivo propuesto.

You achieve a unifying focus that helps advocate your stance, streamlining the essence of the points you wish to drive home and strengthening a convincing conclusion.

Creating flow is an art that transforms the debate into a structured masterpiece. Whether ink meets paper or keys dance on a laptop, the columns and rows become the canvas. Stock issues set the stage, each row a stage for arguments. From advantages to counterplans, the flow weaves a tapestry of abbreviated wisdom. It’s not just notes; it’s the heartbeat of the debate, captured in symbols and labels. 📝💬

The flow creates itself when you are positive, gracious and compassionate All you do is steer the flow It's quite simple, allow the party to express all of their NEEDS without interruption, or placing any judgement (eg. guilt) on them and remove yourself from the importance of their needs. And then you do the same 🤔 You identify and separate the NEEDS from the WANTS and then you focus on the NEEDS and compromise ♥️😇

Begin by drawing a line down the center of your paper, representing the affirmative and negative sides. Subdivide each side into sections for major contentions and supporting points. Utilize abbreviations, symbols, and arrows to denote relationships between arguments and responses.

Picture a timeline on paper. Along the top list the main speech times such as Constructive, Crossfire, Rebuttals, etc. Vertically create columns for arguments or contentions. Under each column jot down subpoints, evidence and responses. Use arrows to connect points together. Your flow becomes a visual representation of how the debate progresses.

Here is how: 1. Staying calm 2. Listen actively to the person and audience, without interruptions. 3. Express your thoughts effectively when speaking 4. EXplain potential ways to come to terms with your point of view or the subject matter 5. Support your debate with evidence. 6. Practice, Practice, Practice!!! Very important

10Ss for Flow Format : 1. Structure 2. Speaker 3. Speech 4. Scribe 5. Stock 6. Significance 7. Solvency 8. Support 9. Scrutinize 10. Summarize #10Ss #10Ss4FlowFormat

one thing i've found helpful is Key contentions, strategically positioned with arrows delineating responses, foster clarity amid intricate arguments. Subpoints and evidence enhance granularity, while symbolic annotations aid prioritization. Integration of cross-examination insights ensures a dynamic representation. Continuous updates, potential color coding, and a succinct legend contribute to an efficient, visually accessible flowchart. This methodical process results in a tool for seamless navigation, enabling effective referencing and real-time adaptation during the debate. Post-debate reflection guarantees an adaptive approach to information management in subsequent engagements

If one or more assertions of the counterside leaves your stock or side issues unsustained, no matter this is obvious to everyone or not, do not hessitate to modify your stock assertions.

Definitely the best visual management of a workflow is on the Kanban Board, with all the practices and principles of the Kanban method. With explicit policies and standardization of cards and columns, reading the flow is very intuitive and organic.

This is the best way to chew the meat and spit out the bone. It is the flow that allows you to see what practice or arguments work greater and which are irrelevant. There are strengths and weaknesses to most and the flow is when you get to figure it out.

Reading the flow involves interpreting the visual representation of arguments, counterarguments, and their interconnections. Follow the logical sequence, paying attention to the direction of arrows, and grasp the relationships between different points on both sides.

The flow should narrate a story of the debates unfolding events. Follow the order of arguments presented by both sides along with their corresponding responses and counterarguments. The arrows will assist you in tracking these back and forth exchanges between opposing viewpoints. A quick glance at your flow should provide you with an overview of the debate landscape. Help inform your strategic decision making.

7Rs for Reading a Flow 1. Review 2. Responses 3. Rebuttals 4. References 5. Relatedness 6. Refutes 7. Recommendations #7Rs #7Rs4ReadingaFlow

In my experience, I recognize the speech order, ensuring clarity on affirmative and negative constructs. The central line guides, showing interconnected arguments. Identify key contentions strategically positioned for development. Arrows signify responses, crucial for tracking debate progression. Subpoints and evidence add depth. Symbols denote argument strength, aiding prioritization. Grass color coding's significance, often representing distinct elements. Cross-examination notes and time allocations offer insights. A concise legend clarifies coded elements. Continuous updates signal evolving strategies. Mastering this nuanced skill enhances interpretation and navigation in the dynamic policy debate landscape.

Uff, esta parte es apasionante y por lo tanto, única, aquí damos paso a la esencia del debate, argumento y cotraargumentos, eso es lo que genera interés en la audiencia, permite al receptor del mensaje darse cuenta de aquello que queremos trasmitir, en muchos de los casos, creo que en la mayoría de ellos, la organización de ideas es determinante.

El uso del flujo es indispensable para demostrar una secuencia lógica y cronológica de los hechos que queremos demostrar. Para ello, lo utilizaremos a fin de organizar nuestras ideas en primer lugar, creando una secuencia de argumentación, pero también, lo vamos a usar para el momento de la sustentación, anticipándonos a los diversos escenarios que se puedan generar y poder crear las estrategias de respuesta a cada supuesto. No obstante, es preciso señalar que no todo puede plasmarse en un flujo, por lo que recomiendo, desarrollar las competencias de creatividad, espontaneidad e improvisación, para gestionar de manera eficiente una respuesta a los argumentos generados por la otra parte y que no habíamos previsto en el flujo.

Organize your arguments on the flow by placing them under relevant contentions and subpoints. Clearly label each component to ensure easy navigation during the debate. Use arrows and connections to illustrate how arguments interact and respond to each other.

Each column represents a theme or contention in the debate. Ensure that your arguments are logically structured within these columns to maintain coherence and clarity throughout your presentation. During the course of the debate refer back, to your opponents points on the flow to identify any weaknesses and construct founded rebuttals accordingly. This organized approach allows for building upon your case in a manner.

5Hs for Using the Flow to Organize Your Arguments: 1. Highlight 2. Harmonize 3. Hint 4. Hold 5. Hack #5Hs #5Hs4FlowArgumentsOrganization

Mastering flow reading in policy debates requires precision. Recognize speech order, ensuring clarity on affirmative and negative constructs. The central line guides interconnected arguments; identify key contentions strategically. Arrows denote responses for tracking debate progression. Subpoints and evidence add depth, while symbols prioritize argument strength. Understand color coding's significance, often representing distinct elements. Cross-examination notes and time allocations provide insights. A concise legend clarifies coded elements. Continuous updates signal evolving strategies. Mastery enhances interpretation and navigation in the dynamic policy debate landscape.

Another perspective on improving flow skills is to focus on active listening. Pay close attention to the arguments presented by each speaker. Train yourself to identify the main points, evidence, and rebuttals quickly. Actively engage with the content and make connections between the arguments.

The question is what if you are the first to speak or raise the discuss,for me it all depends on the circumstance, however i make sure that when case of such arise even when one is to deviate from the main topic a bit you always find a way to move back to the main discuss while you have to paid attention to what not be said, ignore, considered unimportant .

Make sure to practice much as you can! Engage in debates or observe experienced debaters in action. Take note of how they organize their thoughts and handle information. It's important to develop the skill of synthesizing information and adjusting your approach based on the flow of the debate. Additionally don't hesitate to seek feedback, from your peers or mentors to improve your technique.

Para mejorar nuestras habilidades de flujo, como en cualquier otra competencia, no basta con el conocimiento técnico de la disciplina a desarrollar, sino que también es necesaria la práctica constante. Como he comentado previamente, el flujo es una gran herramienta para organizar y plasmar en limpio nuestras ideas de manera estructurada, lo que nos facilitará el debate. No obstante, es preciso perfeccionar competencias que nos permitan desenvolvernos de forma fluida en el debate, en situaciones no previstas en el flujo. En ese sentido, hay competencias complementarias a gestionar como la creatividad, improvisación, espontaneidad y por supuesto la oratoria.

Enhance flow skills through practice. Engage in mock debates, where you can refine your ability to quickly capture and articulate arguments visually. Additionally, seek feedback from experienced debaters to identify areas for improvement.

Listening and practice are the two most important factors to improve your flow in a debate. Practice with coaches (Public speakers and renowned orators). Being unique is key, and do not try to imitate anyone, not even your coaches. You must not be cliche in trying to improve; be yourself and use your innate ability to get better. For example, smiling, being audible and confident, and taking short pauses during conversations. The list goes on and on.

7Ps for Flow Skills : 1. Plan 2. Prepare 3. Priorities 4. Practice 5. Previewing 6. Perfect 7. Present #7Ps #7Ps4FlowSkills

Talk to the team, include the delivery operators in any discussion or flow review, they understand the day to day life and what works and what doesn't!

Describe the methodology you will use to achieve the project's goals. This could include the project management framework, technologies, and techniques you will employ. Example: "We will adopt an agile project management approach, utilizing iterative development and constant stakeholder feedback to ensure the system meets user needs effectively."

I remember contesting for my association presidency in medical school, and I realized that my eloquence and speech amongst other contestants were striking during our open-hearing manifesto. That alone made me become the union's president in my medical school.