Design of Helmet Cooling System Modules and Their Comparison
Design of Helmet Cooling System Modules and Their Comparison
Design of Helmet Cooling System Modules and Their Comparison
http://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2020.6034
International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET)
ISSN: 2321-9653; IC Value: 45.98; SJ Impact Factor: 7.429
Volume 8 Issue VI June 2020- Available at www.ijraset.com
Abstract: Now-a-days Helmet is a hot topic as well as very much important for safety of the rider, often reason for not using
Helmet is the uncomforting feel due to the higher temperature than that of the Surrounding which leads to suffocation as a
result the Helmet use is avoided by many of the peoples. The helmets present in the market are too traditional and
uncomfortable for the rider to wear it for a longer time period. There has been significant period till the previous development of
helmet. It does not provide enough cooling to the human head. So to overcome this problem we had develop the cooling system
for motorbike helmet, our aim is to Compare and select the best module by taking various parameters into consideration from
two modules viz: Peltier Module Helmet cooling system and Phase Change material Helmet cooling system
Keywords: (Uncomfortable, Suffocation, Peltier Module, Phase Change material, compare)
I. INTRODUCTION
The Helmet is the most essential equipment when it comes to safety factor. There are several helmet available with various modified
Designs and in wide varieties but maximum of the designs fails to provide the comfort to the rider by providing the cooling effect,
as many surveys in India and certain other countries clearly stated that major reason of not wearing the helmet is discomfort caused
due to the heat issues.
This heat is mainly caused due to high insulation properties of the liner in Helmet which results into the low heat transfer and this
may also result into distraction of the rider during the long rides.
This Paper mainly focusses on to overcome this problem caused, there are two effective methods which can provide the cooling
effect which are the Peltier Module and Phase Change Material Module.
The Peltier Module works on principle of Peltier effect and the following equation can be stated
Q = (µ1 – µ2)* I
Where µ1 is Peltier coefficient of conductor 1 and µ2 is Peltier coefficient of conductor 2 and I is the current from 1 to 2.
The Phase Change Material works on the Principle of a heat transfer through conduction and provides cooling to the rider. The
Phase change Material changes it phase from one to another. The PCM powder is packed into bag and is placed between the head
and Liner of the Helmets, when the helmet inner temperature increases and is larger than melting temperature of PCM the phase
change process occurs which nearly takes 25 to 30 minutes.
Furthermore this two modules will operated and test in same conditions and various parameters such as safety, cost, weight and
maintenance will be compared.
II. METHOD
A. Peltier Effect: [1]
Peltier Effect and Seebeck Effect features a reverse phenomenon with reference to one another, whereby thermal energy is absorbed
at one dissimilar metal junction and discharged at the other junction when an current is flowed within the circuit (circuit).
The circuit is modified to desire a configuration that accompany the Peltier Effect, a phenomenon opposite that of the Seebeck
Effect. If a voltage (Ein) is applied to terminals T1 and T2 respectively, an electrical current (I) will flow within the circuit. As a
results of the present flow, a small cooling effect is obtained at thermocouple A (where heat is absorbed), and a heating effect (QH)
will occur at junction B (where heat is expelled). Note that this effect could even be reversed whereby a change within the direction
of electrical current flow will reverse the direction of heat flow.
Joule heating, having a magnitude of I2 x R (where R is that the electrical resistance), also occurs within the conductors as a results
of current flow. This Joule heating effect acts con to the Peltier Effect and causes a net reduction of the available cooling.
The Peltier effect are often expressed mathematically as,
QC or QH= β x I = (αT x I)
Where:
1) β is that the Peltier coefficient between the 2 materials A and B in volts.
2) I denotes current flow in amperes.
3) QC and QH are the rates of cooling and heating, respectively, in watt
C. Heat Calculation
1) Radiation Heat Flow
The radiation is emission or transmission of energy within the shape of waves or particles through space or medium. This includes
a) Electro-Magnetic radiation like radio waves micro waves light x-ray and gamma ray.
b) Particle radiation like (Alpha) α, (Beta) β and (Gamma) γ, radiation.
Thermal radiation could also be an immediate results of the random movements of atoms and molecules in matter. Since these
atoms and molecules are composed of charged particles (protons and electrons), their movement results in the emission of
electromagnetic radiation, which carries energy far away from the surface.
The Stefan–Boltzmann law describes the potential to be radiated from a black body in terms of its temperature. Specifically, the
Stefan–Boltzmann law states that the general energy radiated per unit area of a black body across all wavelengths per unit time is
directly proportional to the biquadrate of the black body's thermodynamic temperature T:
j* = σT4
The constant of proportionality σ is named as Stefan–Boltzmann constant the worth of the constant is
Where,
k is that the Boltzmann constant,
h is Planck's constant,
c is that the speed of light during a vacuum.
The Stefan-Boltzmann equation, which describes the speed of transfer of energy, is as follows for an object during a vacuum
2) Convection heat Flow: Heat convection occurs when bulk flow of a fluid carries heat in conjunction with a flow of matter
within the fluid. The flow of fluid may force by external forces or sometimes by buoyancy forces caused due to thermal energy
expands the fluid thus influencing its own transfer. The latter process is typically called natural convection. All convective
process also move heat partly by diffusion. Another quite convection is forced convection. During this fluid is forced to flow by
use of pump, fan or other mechanical means. The convection heat transfer is given by Newton’s Law, Q= h A (Thead - T)
Where, h= convective heat transfer coefficient= 50 W/m2 °C (for air)
Q2= 50 x 0.125664 x (310 - 298)
=75.4watts
3) Metabolic Equivalent of Task [5]: The metabolic equivalent could even be a physiological measure expressing the energy cost
of physical activities and is stated because the ratio of rate during a specific physical activity to a refere rate, set by convention
to 3.5 ml O2 kg-1 min-1 or approximately,
1 MET= 1 kcal/kg*h =4.184 kJ/kg*h =1.16222 W/kg
Still, another definition of 1 MET= 58.2 W/m2,
Which is capable the speed of energy produce per unit area of a mean person seated at rest. For, riding bike 3MET energy is
consumed,
Q3= 3 x 58.2 =174.6 W/m2 =174.6 x 0.125664 =22 watts
So, total heat to be removed,
Q= Q1 + Q2 + Q3
=7.42 + 75.4 + 22
=104.76 watts
35
HELMET TEMPERATURE
34
33
(CELSIUS)
32
31
30
29
28
0 10 20 30 40
TIME(MIN)
B. Outcomes
1) The Cooling Effect can be rapidly provided by Peltier Module as compared to the Phase Change Material Module.
2) The Peltier Module takes Nearly 7.5 minutes to drop the temperature by 7.7ºC.
3) The PCM module takes nearly 30 minutes to cool down the temperature from 34ºC to 29ºC.
4) The PCM module provides the cooling effect for longer Period time.
IV. CONCLUSION
From the above research following points can be made:
A. The Peltier Module weighs nearly 400 Grams more than the PCM module.
B. The Peltier Module has a Running time of Nearly 30 minutes and PCM module can provide cooling for 1.5 to 2 hrs.
C. The Peltier Module has a Cut of nearly 3*3 cm2 for the setup of Peltier Module on the Helmet and on other hand PCM module
is 100% safe as Compared, Since it do not have any cuts.
D. The Peltier Module is approx. 3 times Expensive than the PCM module Thereby it can concluded that Phase Change Material
Module is more Effective and Useable from the certain above observations.
V. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We cannot express enough thanks to our Institution and Department for their continued support and encouragement:
Prof.M.Murugkar Sir, Head of the Department; Prof.M.P.Panchbhai, Guide; Prof.R.D.Rakhade, Project Co-coordinator. We offer
my sincere appreciation for the learning opportunities provided by our faculties.
Our completion of this Project and Research Article could not have been accomplished without the support of all.
Thank you for allowing us time away from you to research and write.
REFERENCES
[1] Swapnil S. Khode, et al, ‘Review on Application of Thermoelectric Peltier Module in cooling and power generating Technology’International Journal of
Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR) ISSN: 2321-0869, Volume-3, Issue-1, January 2015
[2] Vasishta D. Bhatt et al, ‘Thermal Energy Storage capacity of some Phase Changing Material and Iconic Liquids’ International Journal Of Chem tech Research,
Vol.2 no.3 p. 1771-1779, Sept 2010
[3] V.V.Tyagi et al, 'Thermal cycle testing of calcium chloride hexahydrate as a possible PCM for latent heat storage' Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
92(2008) 891-899 Papers from Handbook
[4] Specification of Thermoelectric Module TE C1-12706
Web-links
[5] Metabolic equivalent of task/www.wikipedia.org