Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Nonverbal cues to deception among intimates, friends, and strangers

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Buller and Burgoon (in press) propose that deceivers attempt to encode strategically nonverbal cues which indicate nonimmediacy and project a positive image. At the same time, deceivers leak arousal and negative affect via their nonverbal display. This experiment tested these predictions, while examining the influence of relational history on deception cues and the stability of deception cues within deceptive conversations. The nonverbal behavior of 130 strangers, friends, and intimates was measured. Results indicated that deceivers signalled nonimmediacy, arousal, and negative affect, but they did not appear to project a positive image. Deception cues were mediated by relational history and showed considerable temporal variation. Strangers leaked more arousal and negative affect than friends and intimates. Further, deceivers, particularly deceiving friends and intimates, seemed to monitor and control their nonverbal behavior during deception by suppressing arousal and negative affect cues and moderating nonimmediate behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baskett, G., & Freedle, R. O. (1974). Aspects of language pragmatics and the social perception of lying.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (1978, April). Micromoments.Human Behavior, 34–35.

  • Berrien, F. K., & Huntington, G. H. (1943). An exploratory study of pupillary responses during deception.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 443–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. B. (1987).Deception among intimates, friends, and strangers: Attributional biases due to relationship development. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Boston.

  • Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (in press). Deception. In J. A. Daly and J. M. Wiemann,Communicating strategically: Strategies in interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Burgoon, J. K. (1978). Attributes of the newscaster's voice as predictors of his credibility.Journalism Quarterly, 55, 276–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (in press).Introduction to nonverbal communication. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1987). Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication.Communication Monographs, 54, 19–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970).Studies in machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. R. (1975).A comparison of pupillary response, heart rate, and GSR during deception. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago.

  • Comadena, M. E. (1982). Accuracy in detecting deception: Intimate and friendship relationships. In M. Burgoon (Ed.),Communication yearbook 6 (pp. 446–472). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D., & Marlowe, D. (1964).The approval motive: Studies in evaluative dependence. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. I., & Lassitef, G. D. (1985a). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.),The self and social life (pp. 323–370). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. I., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985b). Telling ingratiating lies: Effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1191–1203.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Zuckerman, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1980). Detecting deception: Modality effects. In L. Wheeler (Ed.),Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 125–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • deTurck, M. A., & Miller, G. R. (1985). Deception and arousal: Isolating the behavioral correlates of deception.Human Communication Research, 12, 181–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1985).Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception.Psychiatry, 32, 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1974). Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 288–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., O'Sullivan, M., & Scherer, K. (1980). Relative importance of face, body and speech in judgments of persoanlity and affect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 270–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Scherer, K. (1976). Body movement and voice pitch in deceptive interaction.Semiotica, 16, 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, H. B. (1926). Reaction-time symptoms of deception.American Journal of Psychology, 37, 428–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. S., Devin-Sheehan, L., & Allen, V. L. (1978). Nonverbal cues as indicators of verbal dissembling.American Educational Research Journal, 15, 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. L. (1981). Transitions in relationship style from adolescence to young adulthood.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 10. 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. L., & Narus, L. R. (1981). Sex roles and intimacy in same sex and other sex relationships.Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 444–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, W. V., Ekman, P., & Wallbott, H. (1979). Measuring hand gestures.Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 4, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, E. R. (1923). Reaction times and the consciousness of deception.American Journal of Psychology, 34, 562–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, J. E., & Leathers, D. G. (1980). Nonverbal indicators of deception: A new theoretical perspective.Communication Monographs, 47, 119–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P., & Dennis, H. S. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct.Human Communication Research, 1, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M., Geller, V., & Olson, C. (1976).Modalities and cues in the detection of deception. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Kraut, R. (1978). Verbal and nonverbal cues in the perception of lying.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 380–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (1980). Humans as lie detectors: Some second thoughts.Journal of Communication, 30, 209–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiken, D. (1981). Nonimmediate language style and inconsistency between private and expressed evaluations.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston, W. M. (1920). Reaction-time symptoms of deception.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 72–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo, J. D., Wiens, A. N., Jackson, R. H., & Manaugh, T. S. (1970). Interviewee speech behavior under conditions of endogenously-present and exogenously-induced motivational states.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, C. C., & Hunt, R. G. (1975). Nonverbal indicators of affect and deception in an interview setting.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCornack, S. A., & Parks, M. R. (1985). Deception detection and relationship development: The other side of trust. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.),Communication yearbook 9 (pp. 377–389). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1971). Nonverbal betrayal of feeling.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (1972).Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. R., Bauchner, J. E., Hocking, J. E., Fontes, N. E., Kaminski, E. P., & Brandt, D. R. (1981). “... and nothing but the truth”: How well can observers detect deceptive testimony? In B. D. Sales (Ed.),Perspectives in law and psychology. Volume III: The jury, judicial and trial process. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, J. K. (1982). Factors affecting witness credibility. In N. L. Kerr & R. M. Bray (Eds.),The psychology of the courtroom (pp. 169–194). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motley, M. T. (1974). Acoustic correlates of lies.Western Speech, 38, 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hair, H. D., Cody, M. J., & McLaughlin, M. L. (1981). Prepared lies, spontaneous lies, Machiavellianism, and nonverbal communication.Human Communication Research, 7, 325–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E., & Friedman, H. S. (1983). Individual differences and cues to deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 899–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, L. A., Krauss, R. M., Geller, V., Olson, C., & Apple, W. (1977). Pitch changes during attempted deception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 345–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1975).Self-disclosure and trust: Conceptualization, measurement, and inter-relationships. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.

  • Zuckerman, M., DeFrank, R. S., Hall, J. A., Larrance, D. T., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 378–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–59). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Driver, R. E. (1985). Telling lies: Verbal and nonverbal correlates of deception. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Communication, University of Arizona, 85721, Tucson, AZ

    David B. Buller (assistant professor of Communication)

  2. the University of Hawaii, USA

    R. Kelly Aune (assistant professor of Speech Communication)

Authors
  1. David B. Buller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Kelly Aune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buller, D.B., Aune, R.K. Nonverbal cues to deception among intimates, friends, and strangers. J Nonverbal Behav 11, 269–290 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987257

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987257

Keywords

Search

Navigation