What Really Happens to Consumer Recycling?

The Net Zero Carbon Strategist

Welcome and thank you for reading The Net Zero Strategist. A weekly update on harnessing the power of decarbonization, digitization, and enhanced data collection, delivering buildings of the future powered by renewable energy & automation.

Want to stay informed? 

Subscribe to this series using the button above and let us know what you want to hear about next week using #UrbanAO in the comments below. 

What Really Happens to Consumer Recycling? A Comprehensive Examination

As the world grapples with growing waste management challenges and the race to achieve net-zero emissions intensifies, recycling has long been promoted as a central solution to reduce waste and conserve resources.

However, the real impact of consumer recycling is far less than what most people assume.

Recent research, including an eye-opening experiment where AirTags were placed in recyclable materials to track their fate, has revealed that much of what is intended for recycling never gets processed as such. Instead, these materials often end up in landfills or are incinerated.

It is crucial to understand the actual dynamics of recycling, particularly as it pertains to plastics, metals, paper, and glass.

In this article, we explore the hard facts about what really happens to consumer recycling, the systemic challenges, and what must change if recycling is to play a meaningful role in achieving environmental goals.

Global Recycling Rates: The Stark Reality

Globally, recycling rates for key materials, particularly plastics, are alarmingly low. Despite years of public campaigns and significant advancements in recycling infrastructure, the vast majority of plastic waste is not recycled.

According to a report from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), only 9% of all plastic waste ever produced has been recycled. In the United States, recycling rates for plastic are even lower, with recent studies showing that just 5% to 6% of all plastic waste is being recycled in 2021.

This represents a dramatic decline in recent years, particularly after China's National Sword Policy in 2018, which banned the import of foreign plastic waste and caused a global recycling crisis.

China had historically been the world’s largest importer of plastic waste, handling nearly 45% of the world's plastics. However, with this lifeline cut off, many countries—especially in North America and Europe—were forced to reckon with their limited recycling capacity.

The U.S. and other developed nations were caught unprepared, lacking both the infrastructure and domestic demand to handle the vast amounts of waste they had been exporting. Consequently, much of the waste that was previously sent to China now ends up in domestic landfills, contributing to the growing environmental burden.

Plastic Recycling: A Failed Promise

The situation is especially dire for plastic recycling.

Of the approximately 400 million tons of plastic waste generated globally each year, less than 10% is recycled.

In fact, the majority of plastic waste—85% of plastic packaging, which accounts for 36% of all plastic production—ends up in landfills or incinerated. Even when plastics are recycled, they degrade in quality with each cycle, a process known as downcycling.

This means that plastics can only be recycled a limited number of times before they become unusable for their original purpose. For example, a recycled plastic bottle might become synthetic fibers for clothing or carpets, which are harder to recycle further.

Moreover, not all plastics are created equal when it comes to recyclability.

PET (Polyethylene terephthalate) and HDPE (High-density polyethylene) are commonly recycled, but other types, such as PVC and polystyrene, are more difficult to process.

Mixed plastic products, which combine different types of polymers, are especially problematic and often not recyclable at all. This results in many plastic items, even those placed in recycling bins, being incinerated or sent to landfills.

The issue is further compounded by contamination, as plastic products frequently contain food residue, adhesives, or other materials that make recycling more difficult.

The Problem of Contamination: A Barrier to Effective Recycling

Contamination is one of the most significant barriers to effective recycling.

When different materials—such as food waste or non-recyclable plastics—are mixed with recyclables, it greatly complicates the recycling process. For example, in the United States, contamination rates can reach as high as 25%, meaning that a quarter of the materials collected for recycling are deemed unsuitable and ultimately diverted to landfills or incinerators.

This contamination problem is particularly acute for plastics, which often require significant cleaning and sorting before they can be processed.

Contaminated materials can spoil entire batches of recycling, increasing costs for waste management facilities and further reducing recycling efficiency. For example, a greasy pizza box, though made of recyclable cardboard, often cannot be processed because food contamination renders the cardboard unfit for recycling.

Similarly, plastic containers with food residue require extensive cleaning before they can be recycled, which is both costly and energy-intensive. When contamination is too high, recycling facilities often send entire batches of materials to landfills instead of processing them.

Glass, Metals, and Paper: Recycling Success Stories

In contrast to plastics, other materials such as glass, metals, and paper have higher recycling rates and can be recycled more effectively.

Glass, for example, can be recycled indefinitely without any degradation in quality, meaning it can be repeatedly melted down and reformed into new glass products. However, even glass recycling faces challenges. It must be sorted by color—clear, green, or brown—and many recycling programs lack the infrastructure to handle this, resulting in large amounts of glass being sent to landfills.

Metals, particularly aluminum, are among the most efficiently recycled materials. Recycling aluminum saves up to 95% of the energy required to produce it from raw materials. Additionally, aluminum can be recycled indefinitely without losing its properties, making it one of the most valuable materials for recycling. The global recycling rate for aluminum is approximately 76%, significantly higher than plastics and other materials.

Paper is another material that is widely recycled, with global recycling rates hovering around 68%. Paper can be recycled 5-7 times before its fibers become too short to be useful. However, the recycling process for paper, which involves de-inking and pulping, is resource-intensive, requiring significant amounts of water and energy. Moreover, contaminated paper products, such as those stained with food or oil, are not suitable for recycling.

The Global Picture: Recycling Practices Around the World

Different countries approach recycling with varying degrees of success.

Nations like Germany and South Korea have implemented robust recycling programs that have led to impressive results.

Germany, in particular, has the highest recycling rate in the world, with 71% of its waste being recycled. This success is largely due to strict laws requiring the separation of waste, bottle deposit systems, and public education campaigns. South Korea follows closely, with a 53.7% recycling rate, and also enforces strict separation and deposit schemes.

In contrast, countries like the United States lag far behind.

The U.S. has a national recycling rate of approximately 32%. In many American cities, especially smaller or rural ones, the lack of standardized recycling programs leads to confusion about what can be recycled, further contributing to high contamination rates and low recycling success.

Moreover, the financial burden of maintaining recycling programs has led many municipalities to cut back or entirely eliminate their recycling services.

Incineration and Landfills: The Dark Reality of Waste Management

The dark side of the recycling story is that much of what consumers believe is being recycled is actually incinerated or sent to landfills.

Incineration reduces the volume of waste but produces large amounts of carbon dioxide and other harmful emissions, contributing to global warming. Additionally, plastics burned in incinerators release toxic chemicals such as dioxins and furans, which pose significant health risks to nearby communities.

On the other hand, materials sent to landfills contribute to the release of methane, a greenhouse gas that is 28-34 times more potent than carbon dioxide over a 100-year period.

Landfill gas, composed of methane and carbon dioxide, is generated as organic materials decompose anaerobically. Even materials like plastic that do not decompose for hundreds of years slowly break down, releasing toxic chemicals into the soil and groundwater.

In some cases, recyclables collected from curbside programs are sent directly to landfills because the materials are either contaminated or there is no market demand for them. For example, low-grade plastics such as plastic bags or certain types of packaging materials are often not economically viable to recycle, leading to their disposal in landfills.

How Recycling Reduces Carbon Emissions

Recycling remains an important part of reducing carbon emissions, particularly for materials like aluminum, glass, and paper.

By recycling rather than producing these materials from raw resources, we can save a tremendous amount of energy. For example, recycling aluminum uses up to 95% less energy than extracting new aluminum from bauxite ore. Similarly, recycling glass can reduce energy use by 30%, and recycling paper saves approximately 40% of the energy required to make new paper.

Plastic recycling, while less efficient, still offers some benefits. Depending on the type of plastic, recycling can reduce carbon emissions by 30-80% compared to producing new plastic. However, the problem is that these gains are often undermined by the low recycling rates for plastics.

While recycling significantly reduces the carbon footprint for many materials, it is not without its environmental costs.

The recycling process itself requires energy, particularly for cleaning, sorting, and transporting materials. Additionally, the energy used in transporting recyclables from collection points to processing facilities increases the overall carbon footprint, particularly when these facilities are far away from urban centers.

Recycling and Waste Management Challenges: A Global Perspective

Countries around the world face varying degrees of success with their recycling programs.

Germany leads with an impressive 71% recycling rate, largely due to a sophisticated system of separating waste at the source and enforcing strict recycling laws.

South Korea and Sweden also stand out for their strong recycling practices, with 53.7% and 49.6% of waste recycled, respectively.

These countries have invested heavily in public education, infrastructure, and policies that ensure compliance and high recycling rates.

Conversely, the United States, with a national recycling rate of around 32%, has struggled to implement consistent recycling practices across its states. The lack of standardization in municipal recycling programs, coupled with high contamination rates and economic challenges, continues to hinder progress.

Case Study: CARBIOS Enzymatic Degradation of Plastic

New Nature Magazine publication confirms CARBIOS’ expertise in enzymatic degradation of plastic.

CARBIOS and TBI - Toulouse Biotechnology Institute, Bio & Chemical Engineering publish groundbreaking article that demonstrates complete disintegration and biodegradation of enzyme-embedded PLA in home-compost conditions faster than certification timeframe requirements.

This new publication in Nature, widely regarded as the most influential scientific journal, comes in addition to the 2020 publication on enzymatic depolymerization of PET, reinforcing CARBIOS’ leadership in enzymatic engineering and industrial solutions.

Alain Marty, Chief Scientific Officer: "A publication in Nature is an especially proud moment for all the contributing teams, notably recognition from peers in the scientific community. Developing an efficient enzyme that can withstand the 170°C needed to introduce it into PLA is an outstanding scientific feat! Our previous article published in Nature in 2020 was pivotal in bringing our PET biorecycling technology to the world stage. We are very excited by the enhanced visibility of CARBIOS’ unique biodegradation technology brought by this publication, as it offers a practical and scalable approach to various industrial PLA-based packaging applications."

Click here to read the article: https://lnkd.in/gFtG5h9n

Carbios is a biotech company developing and industrializing biological solutions to reinvent the life cycle of plastic and textiles. Inspired by nature, Carbios develops enzyme-based processes to break down plastic with a mission to avoid plastic and textile pollution, and accelerate the transition to a circular economy. Its two disruptive technologies for the biorecycling of PET and the biodegradation of PLA are reaching industrial and commercial scale.

Its biorecycling demonstration plant has been operational since 2021 and a first industrial plant, in partnership with Indorama Ventures, is due to be commissioned in 2025.

Carbios has received scientific recognition, notably with the cover of Nature, and is supported by prestigious brands in the cosmetics, Food & Beverage and apparel industries to enhance their products’ recyclability and circularity. Nestlé Waters, PepsiCo and Suntory Beverage & Food Europe are members of a packaging consortium founded by Carbios and L’Oréal. On, Patagonia, PUMA, PVH Corp. and Salomon collaborate with Carbios in a textile consortium. Stuart MacDonald Alain Marty

Case Study: A Triple Net Zero Eco-Resort on Mykonos - Zero Waste, Water, GHG emissions.

Urban A&O's Commitment to Net-Zero and Climate-Positive Impact

Our Zephyros Cliffside Sanctuaries project integrates several pioneering technologies to ensure sustainability and luxury, also widely known as a Triple Net Zero Development. Triple Net Zero refers to achieving net zero energy, net zero water, and net zero waste. To achieve net zero energy, a building must be able to produce as much energy as it uses per year.

This ambitious goal is realized through the integration of advanced technologies and sustainable practices.

• Net Zero Energy:

To achieve net zero energy, the Sanctuaries are designed to produce as much energy as they consume annually. This is accomplished through optimizing the building envelope to reduce HVAC loads, utilizing shades and overhangs to minimize direct sunlight, and incorporating energy-efficient measures. Renewable energy sources, primarily advanced solar panels, will be used to generate all the energy required on-site, ensuring a carbon-free energy supply.

• Net Zero Water:

Achieving net zero water involves implementing advanced water recycling and management systems. These systems capture and treat greywater and rainwater for reuse, significantly reducing the resort's reliance on external water sources. Additionally, water-efficient fixtures and appliances will be installed to minimize water consumption. Mykonos already produces 4,500 cubic meters of water daily through reverse osmosis of seawater, demonstrating the feasibility of advanced water management systems on the island.

• Net Zero Waste:

The Sanctuaries will implement comprehensive waste management strategies to achieve net zero waste. All waste generated by the resort will be sorted and recycled through advanced mechanisms. Organic waste will be composted on-site, minimizing landfill use; for this purpose, we will incorporate a methane digester system. This system captures methane gas produced during the decomposition of organic materials, which can then be converted into biogas and used as an energy source to power resort operations. This process not only reduces greenhouse gas emissions but also provides an additional renewable energy source. Urban A&O, PLLC

The Path Forward: Solutions for Improving Recycling

To improve recycling rates and reduce the environmental impact of waste, a multifaceted approach is required. The current recycling system must be modernized and supported by better policies, technologies, and consumer behavior.

1. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): One key solution is implementing EPR policies, which hold manufacturers responsible for the end-of-life disposal of their products. This would incentivize businesses to design products that are easier to recycle, reducing the burden on consumers and municipalities. EPR has been widely successful in Europe, and there is growing interest in expanding these policies worldwide.

2. Investment in Recycling Infrastructure: Modern recycling systems require sophisticated technologies to efficiently sort, clean, and process materials. Investing in technologies such as AI-driven optical sorters and chemical recycling, which can break plastics down into their original monomers, will make recycling more effective and reduce contamination.

3. Consumer Education: Contamination remains one of the biggest challenges to recycling efficiency. Many people are confused about what can and cannot be recycled, leading to the disposal of non-recyclable items in recycling bins. Public education campaigns, clear labeling, and standardized guidelines are crucial for reducing contamination rates and improving recycling outcomes.

4. Circular Economy: Moving towards a circular economy—where products are designed for reuse, repair, or repurposing—is essential for reducing waste. This approach minimizes the use of raw materials and conserves resources while reducing the demand for new products.

5. Plastic Reduction: Perhaps the most effective strategy is simply reducing the use of single-use plastics altogether. Governments, businesses, and consumers must work together to phase out unnecessary plastics and adopt reusable alternatives.

Conclusion: Recycling Alone Is Not Enough

While recycling is an important part of waste management and carbon reduction strategies, it is not the panacea many believe it to be.

The reality is that much of what is collected for recycling is either sent to landfills, incinerated, or poorly managed due to contamination and economic inefficiencies. To achieve true sustainability and reach net-zero carbon goals, we need to prioritize waste reduction, product redesign for recyclability, and significant investment in recycling infrastructure.

Recycling will continue to play an important role in addressing the waste crisis, but it must be part of a larger strategy focused on reducing consumption, reusing materials, and developing circular economies.

Only by tackling the root causes of waste and inefficiency can we hope to build a more sustainable future for ourselves and the planet.

Final Thoughts

If you want to talk over your options, click here to schedule a time to chat with our Principal Joe MacDonald see how we can help you revolutionize global project development, management, and delivery

If you enjoyed The Sustainable Architect edition, I have a quick favour to ask:

1. Subscribe to The Net Zero Strategist the button at the top of this post so you don’t miss a single #urbanao post.

2. Share this post with your network on LinkedIn if you think they could benefit from the message using the Share button below.