Tim McKibbin’s Post

View profile for Tim McKibbin, graphic

REINSW CEO | Real Estate Thought Leader | Accountant & Lawyer

In all the talk about laws threatening to reduce a landlord’s ability to do as they wish with their property, there’s an obvious truth: investors don’t have to be landlords. There are shares, commercial & industrial property, fixed interest, superannuation and offshore assets all competing for investors’ dollars. For an investor to choose residential property, and provide a home for a tenant, it has to be better than the competition. It really is that simple. Government, in whatever legislation it embarks upon, must drive investment into the rental market. So the burning question is, at a time when everyone knows there are insufficient rental properties, will removing a landlord’s right to recover their property or say ‘no’ to a pet drive more investment? Landlords had their say in this ABC News report: https://shorturl.at/EpOyv

'It's the landlord's property': Warning planned rental protections go too far

'It's the landlord's property': Warning planned rental protections go too far

abc.net.au

Julie Crockett

Borderless Buyers Agent | Training Buyers Agents and Buyers Agent Courses Facilitator | BA Company Training Consultant | Buyers Agent Professional Development Courses | Speaker | BA Business Builder

5mo

💯 agree, Tim! Such a great summary of the current crisis and the choices available to investors. Govt always seems to miss the mark on this critical issue - its investors that do all the heavy lifting to invest in residential property in the first place.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics