Having done product review PR most of my career, this is a really good look under the hood with Walt Mossberg, who pretty much created the category in consumer media at the WSJ (the trades/tech outlets had very very techy reviews, but he brought it to the every person ... well, who read the WSJ) and Marques Brownlee, who has set the standard on YouTube.
I've pitched both (success with Walt as it's a higher batting average, less than a handful of pitches to Marques). With all product review programs, there's been an aspect of influencer relations - I was pitching enthusiast sites and groups - as well as industry analysts that focused on the space. Now, that's more amped up but that also brings in more pay-for-play attempts (those aren't reviews, that's just paid placement) and as noted in the article, it's hard to know what is what nowadays. I'm fine, though, with affiliate links because I do think media needs multiple revenue streams.
A side story from my time in online photography that relates to the article. I was at a CES event with a bunch of the photo and camera reviewers, and they asked about my favorite digital camera. I mentioned the HP 315 digital camera (yes, I remember the model) and the camera guys mocked me because it wasn't the best chip or optics. I pushed back and said that with digital photography, I want a camera the I could give to my mom to use, one that embodied the old Kodak ethos of push the button, we do the rest. The HP was that simple-easy and could get more people into digital photography. One of the reviewers spoke up and noted I was right, it was the mainstream easy-to-use camera.
Then we all got iPhones and smartphones with good cameras, so it was as moot point. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Chief Executive Officer at Classic Vw owners club
3wWould be quite interesting