Immediately after Donald Trump won the US election, postal orders of abortion pills spiked across the country. The prospect of another Trump presidency appears to have prompted a fear among many Americans that their access to abortion and contraception may soon be drastically reduced. But the issue stretches beyond US borders. Around the world, hundreds of millions of women who had no say in Trump’s election could lose vital health services because of his decisions. Central to Trump’s global influence on women’s health is a policy called the Global Gag Rule. It says that any organisation receiving US aid money must agree not to perform or promote abortion. Ironically, research has linked the rule to a fall in contraception use and a rise in abortions. Read more 👇 #Trump #contraception #abortion #womenshealth #America #plannedparenthood
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
In today's conversation about reproductive rights, understanding the historical context is crucial. An insightful article from the Center for American Progress delves into the complex history of abortion and contraception in the United States. It highlights how societal, political, and religious influences have shaped policies and public perceptions over centuries. The piece stresses the importance of revisiting this history to better inform current debates and policies, ensuring they reflect the diverse needs and rights of all individuals. Let's engage with history to foster informed, compassionate discussions that prioritize human rights and health. #ReproductiveRights #HistoricalContext #InformedDebate https://lnkd.in/efVKuDaS
Scarlet Letters: Getting the History of Abortion and Contraception Right
https://www.americanprogress.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
"Access to safe, legal abortion can be a lifelong economic stratifier, according to a new analysis of a national database of adolescent health information. The new study assesses abortion and socioeconomic outcomes in two ways, both using data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health). First, the authors analyzed the relationship between living one's teenage years in a region with abortion restrictions and socioeconomic status in adulthood. Second, they compared adult outcomes between adolescent girls who became teen moms and those girls who avoided teen parenthood because they had an abortion." #women #economicoutcome #abortion
Study links abortion access to women's economic outcomes
phys.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
- We believe with Trump at the helm, he will enact draconian laws that will outlaw abortion outright nationally as his political apparatus and his surrogates tout... - At the same time, even with Kamala Harris at the helm, an amendment to codify a woman's right to an abortion into our constitution could prove daunting because Democrats require a sizable majority in both the House and Senate to move forward... - Also, her suggestion to rid us of the filibuster (to a simple Senate majority vote) historically has proven difficult... - The Biden Administration proposed a vote by the legislature to appoint four new justices to the Supreme Court who may be amenable to the abortion issue. Many may see this as political, as when attempted by The FDR Administration; a move to 'stack' the court... Consider: 'A judicial 'procedural' upheaval; not a judicial 'political' upheaval.'... 'Solely the female justices of the Supreme Court alone must decide cases related to 'Women's Reproductive Health' for their fellow 'sisterhood' in the citizenry, while their male counterparts either recuse, or even abstain from such cases.'... empathyequalsjustice.com (Four Pages - Three Minute Read) Reference: Thomas Doyle - 'Top' Featured Post - #KamalaHarris
Americans are picking their first president after the Supreme Court overturned their constitutional right to an abortion. The candidates' visions for reproductive health present a stark contrast.
After losing a constitutional right, America picks a president
19thnews.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In June 2022, the United States (U.S.) Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision overturned Roe v. Wade, thereby eliminating the constitutional right to abortion. Authority now resides with individual states to regulate abortion access in the U.S. The impact of the ruling is expected to exacerbate existing health disparities and produce new inequities in sexual, reproductive, and maternal health outcomes, disproportionately affecting those who are already minoritized and living in States where abortion access has been banned or restricted. Observations from countries that have restricted access to abortion over the past 30 years reveal that such laws increase rates of unsafe abortion, which in many instances leads to pregnant people becoming severely ill or dying from preventable causes.
Frontiers | Editorial: Global perspectives on the health inequities in sexual, reproductive, and maternal health post Roe v. Wade
frontiersin.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Key points about abortion rates post-Roe v. Wade: Overall decline: Since the peak in the early 1990s, abortion rates in the U.S. have generally trended downward, with the most recent data showing a consistent decline in the number of abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age. Factors contributing to decline: Increased availability and use of effective contraception, improved sex education, and economic factors like increased access to healthcare are considered major contributors to the declining abortion rates. Socioeconomic impact: Studies indicate that increased access to education and family planning services, especially for lower-income individuals, has been linked to a significant decrease in unintended pregnancies and subsequent abortions. Recent trends: Following the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturning Roe v. Wade, several states have implemented severe abortion restrictions, potentially leading to an increase in abortion rates in those areas due to limited access to legal abortion services. Important points to consider: Data source variations: Depending on the data source (e.g., Guttmacher Institute vs. CDC), slight variations in abortion statistics may exist. State-level differences: Abortion laws and access vary significantly across different states, leading to disparities in abortion rates. Access to contraception: Ensuring access to affordable and effective contraception is crucial to further reducing unintended pregnancies. Anna Maria Davis Shop Cook Eat Talk Taste Tour #SCETTTtv
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
It has been 2 years since the dreadful #SCOTUS decision to overturn #RoeVWade. Institute for Women's Policy Research has released new data that shows abortion restrictions and bans cost the U.S. a whopping $68 billion, that’s right $68 BILLION. Furthermore, the states that actually honor women’s right to abortion save the economy $45 billion (meaning if they didn’t have protections in place, it would cost the U.S. economy EVEN MORE). Abortion restrictions keep women from participating in the labor force, reaching their full potential, adequately supporting their families…and not to mention they are extremely harmful to women’s health. See more at the link below.
2024 Analysis: Costs of Reproductive Health Restrictions - IWPR
https://iwpr.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Explore the comprehensive history of reproductive health care in America, focusing on the evolution of abortion rights and access. This insightful article from Planned Parenthood Action delves into key milestones, legal battles, and societal shifts that have shaped the landscape of reproductive freedom. Discover how past decisions influence today's policies and continue to impact individuals' rights. #ReproductiveRights #PlannedParenthood #AbortionHistory https://lnkd.in/e8ghgPKq
Abortion in U.S. History
plannedparenthoodaction.org
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
My latest (free to read!) for Bloomberg Law: State fights over #abortion rights ballot measures are spurring debates over mental health in pregnancy and whether an individual’s psychological condition can be used to justify abortion care. Abortion will be on the ballot this fall in at least eight states, with work still underway in three others for inclusion in November. The proposed measures in #Arizona and #Missouri would permit abortions before fetal viability, or roughly 24 weeks, and afterward in situations where a health-care professional determines it’s necessary to “protect the life or physical or mental health of the pregnant” person. Other ballot measures would ensure access after viability to protect the patient’s life or health. Anti-abortion groups have long criticized mental health exceptions and claim this year’s petitions would open the door to abortions for virtually any reason. Providers and policy analysts attribute this to lingering stigma around mental health conditions, adding that courts could soon be forced to consider how mental health is viewed in abortion rights laws. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/ew64d-WY #mentalhealth #healthcare #elections
Abortion Ballot Fights Revive Mental Health Exception Debates
news.bloomberglaw.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Since the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the way local newspapers have discussed abortions has significantly transformed. Prior to the Court's decision, abortion coverage was often centered around health-related terms, while now it has shifted to centering around politically-driven terms like "vote." With the 2024 election quickly approaching and the future of reproductive health care at stake, abortion care has turned into more of a political issue than a reproductive health matter. Keeping the public well informed about the role abortion will play in the 2024 election is vital, but we must remember to discuss the real-world consequences of limited abortion care and show compassion to the women around the country who are directly impacted by this political battle. To preserve the right to abortion care, we must vote for candidates who vow to take politics out of this health care decision. #AbortionRights #RoevWade
How abortion coverage changed in the media, according to the data
politico.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Abortion is always a topic that evokes an emotional reaction but right now, regardless of your personal stance on abortion, we need you to stand up and raise your voice. Slowly but surely, women of the UK are not only losing their reproductive rights but are being criminalised for pregnancy and infant loss. There has been a huge increase of women suffering miscarriages or stillbirths and rather than recieving support following this trauma, are being met with criminal investigations. This is only the start and if you do not act now, we will live in a society where our human rights are continually violated by those in power. Get involved, write to your MP, Join a campaign, fundraise. This is not just a feminist issue. This is a reproductive justice issue, this is a healthcare issue and this is a criminal justice issue. Whether you are somebody who can fall pregnant or you are somebody who cares for somebody who can, this applies to you. We need your voice. Here is how you can help: https://lnkd.in/e6dFQJNu Relevant articles: https://lnkd.in/evMfSJB6 https://lnkd.in/e64quFXR https://lnkd.in/e998kF-Z https://lnkd.in/eB2izahg https://lnkd.in/efNe-xFw
Women accused of illegal abortions in England and Wales after miscarriages and stillbirths
theguardian.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
17,597 followers
More from this author
-
This is how we're going to grow community-led investigations
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism 1y -
You can help shape the future of the Bureau
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism 2y -
It’s the innocent – not the climate destroyers – paying the price for deadly heatwaves
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism 2y