Tokenisation in the context of money and other assets: concepts and implications for central banks. Report to the G20 Joint report by the Bank for International Settlements – BIS and the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructure (CPMI) wihch examined tokenisation - the generation and recording of digital representations of traditional assets on a programmable platform in the context of Financial Services. Exec Summary and Highlights: 💳⛓️💥The report also looked at global challenges in the regulated payments sector and focused on the possible benefits of tokenisation in addressing existing frictions in financial markets. It considered potential benefits of some of the innovative solutions involving new use cases and functions that are currently being explored around the world. ⛔️⚠️It notes that, while the potential benefits of tokenisation, such as cheaper and speedier transactions, have attracted interest, the costs and risks need to be considered. 👩⚖️📉They may also affect how pre- and post-trade functions are executed for money and other assets. In addition, ensuring appropriate governance and legal frameworks, credit and liquidity risks, as well as custody and operational risks will also require focus. 🚧🛣️The report also highlights that risks may materialise in a different manner to the challenges faced by conventional market infrastructures. Tokenisation arrangements provide platform-based intermediation for financial assets that may lead to changes in how financial markets operate and are structured. In this context, the report focuses on four key considerations for central banks: 1. responding to ongoing private sector tokenisation initiatives; for example, whether to foster interoperability in the case of fragmenting markets; 2. assessing the trade-offs and the appropriate balance between different types of settlement assets in token arrangements; 3. Identifying, monitoring and assessing tokenisation arrangements that may need to be subject to sound regulation, supervision, and oversight; and 4. assessing the potential impact of token arrangements on monetary policy implementation, for example through changes in the structure of regulated markets or the demand for central bank versus other types of money. FinStep Asia Alex Medana Benedicte N. Nolens Lucy Wong Leanne (Si Ying) Zhang Daniel Eidan Ronit Ghose Monica Jasuja Sharat Chandra Kristi L Swartz Florian M Spiegl Prasanna Lohar Angelina Efi Pylarinou Richard Turrin Nicholas Soo
Thank you for sharing Syed Musheer Ahmed. This report introduces “token arrangement” meaning more than one technology/ledger with interdependency. Many public and bank entities have promoted tokenization for a number of years now but progress is still very slow. Private entities platforms for tokenized assets like OpenSea NFT, swapping (DeFi) + other have an aggregated peak of a only few transactions per second according to statista.com. No standard DLT/Blockchain today will scale to introduce one shared or unified ledger. Millions of transactions per second including programmable tokens, centralized consensus, physical latency, one regulation fits all, sanction regimes etc.? Key words for the future of tokenization are interoperability and global standards.
Thank you
FinTech CEO I Repeat Entrepreneur with 1 Exit (DLT, Digital Identity, Tokenisation since '15) I Board Member I Advisor & Coach
2moWeekend read…but before I do read it, I think tokenisng payments in isolation is a misplaced navel gazing endeavour: there are sooooo many ways to do payments these days instantly (open banking, A2A, digital money, etc etc). We need to put tokenisation back into a bigger context. i’ll share my thoughts in the coming days 😉