Had a great discussion around giving feedback in sales orgs during our ColdIQ Accelerator Program live session. When it comes to feedback, my principle is simple: Critique in private, praise in public. You don't want to embarrass your colleague in front of the team. Instead, you can align with them in private. Get their thoughts. Understand what was going through their head. And come up with a plan to avoid it in the future. Some like Nvidia's CEO disagree (go check the interview!). They want both types of feedback to be completely public to the team. The argument is that the whole team can benefit from the learnings. I would counter-argue that you can still share the learnings with the team. Just keep the person who made a mistake anonymous. 🙂 That way you build trust with them. You show them you have their best interest at heart. Where do you stand on this?
I think it def depends on the company type and culture. But your method seems reliable for more or less every scenario!
Amazing value provides during this sesh 🤝🏾
argument can be made for both! Depends on personality. Your methods suit you well and you go about things the right way every time
Valuable thing, we need this - thanks man Soheil
It depends on several factors, such as corporate culture, group composition, purpose of the meeting, etc. I can certainly agree with your position. However, if the goal is to give each other feedback, it may be given (as long as it is correct and constructive) positively, critically, positively.