SnapAttack’s Post

Is noise really the enemy? 🤔 SOC teams often face a tough choice: ➡️ Go broad for coverage but get swamped by noise ➡️ Go precise but risk overlooking critical threats But what if low-confidence detections weren't the problem? According to the Detection Engineering Collective (and SnapAttack’s philosophy), low-confidence detections are opportunities with the right context. As our CPO, Tim Nary, puts it, “Low confidence detections are not inherently 'bad', they just need additional context to be actionable. Organizations that deploy only high confidence, 'alertable' detections will miss out on a lot of detection opportunities, leading to higher mean times to detection (if they even can detect at all).” The reality is, you can't defend if you can't detect. And with XDR and modern data analysis tools, we can now deal with the noise in a way that we couldn't before. SnapAttack helps you continuously measure and fine-tune detection confidence, filtering out the noise that matters. By anonymizing confidence data across organizations, our platform highlights what’s worth your attention—so your SOC can operate smarter, not noisier. Want a fresh perspective on managing noise? Check out Detect.fyi's latest blog, "Are you keeping up with your low confidence detections?", here: https://lnkd.in/edqiwNnk #soc #xdr #threatdetection

Have you been keeping up with your low confidence detections?

Have you been keeping up with your low confidence detections?

detect.fyi

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics