(- : noFoe : -)’s Post

From Science to God with Peter Russell Join us for a mind-expanding conversation with Peter Russell, a pioneering thinker on consciousness and contemporary spirituality. With a background in theoretical physics, experimental psychology, and Eastern philosophy, Peter's mission is to bridge the wisdom of spiritual traditions with modern science. In this captivating discussion, we delve into the mysteries of consciousness, the universe, and the profound intersection of science and spirituality. We explore why science struggles to explain consciousness, how the reality we experience is not really 'out there', and the emerging view that consciousness is fundamental to the cosmos. Whether you're intrigued by the nature of God, the essence of reality, or the beauty of mathematics, this conversation promises to open new doors of thought and reflection. Bio - Peter Russell is a leading thinker on consciousness and contemporary spirituality. He coined the term "global brain" with his 1980's bestseller of the same name in which he predicted the Internet and the impact it would have on humanity. He is the author of twelve other books, including Waking Up in Time, From Science to God, and most recently Letting Go of Nothing and Forgiving Humanity. He studied theoretical physics, experimental psychology, and computer science at the University of Cambridge, and meditation and Eastern Philosophy in India. In the 1980s pioneered the introduction of personal growth programs to corporations. His mission is to distill the essential wisdom on human consciousness found in the world’s various spiritual traditions, and to disseminate their teachings on self-liberation in contemporary and compelling ways. About Peter's books : "Letting Go of Nothing: Relax Your Mind and Discover the Wonder of Your True Nature" is available on Amazon: https://amzn.in/d/93slFtx "From Science to God" is available on Amazon: https://amzn.in/d/0JdLlrx https://lnkd.in/gsepaShc #Consciousness #Spirituality #ScienceAndSpirituality #QuantumConsciousness #SpiritualJourney

The Harmonious Intersection of Faith and Science In this special weekend in my Faith and as I reflect on the profound words of Dr Francis Collins, "The God of the Bible is also the God of the genome", I am moved to explore the rich tapestry where faith and science intertwine. The intersection of faith and science is not a recent phenomenon, it's a historical reality that has shaped the course of human knowledge and innovation. In the annals of scientific history, there have been numerous luminaries whose faith not only coexisted with their scientific endeavours but also invigorated them. Their faith, far from being a hindrance, served as the foundation upon which they built their scientific legacies. Take, for example, Sir Isaac Newton, revered as a pillar in physics and mathematics. His profound Christian faith was the lens through which he observed and interpreted the universe. His discovery of the laws of gravity was not only a groundbreaking scientific achievement but an expression of his belief in a divine order. Or consider Gregor Mendel, an Augustinian monk, whose meticulous work in the gardens of his monastery laid the foundation for modern genetics. His faith did not deter him from exploring the intricacies of nature; instead, it was his guiding light. Even in contemporary times, the likes of Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health and a key figure in the Human Genome Project, stands as a testament to the harmonious existence of faith and science. His belief in God does not negate his commitment to scientific inquiry; rather, it enhances it. It is easy to perceive science and faith as two parallel lines that never meet. However, history has shown us time and again that they are more like interwoven threads in the fabric of human understanding. The God of the altar is indeed the God of the laboratory, guiding us as we seek to unravel the mysteries of the universe. In this quest for knowledge, may we remember the words of Albert Einstein, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." Here's to the ongoing dialogue between faith and science, and the remarkable discoveries that await us in this shared journey. #faithandscience #intersection #discovery

IS AN ORANGE AN ORANGE? There is very little dialog happening in the U.S., but disputes are quotidian. For proper dialog to take place, all parties must have receptivity to opposing ideas. If someone says an orange is not an orange, one must investigate with an open mind why such a contrary opinion exists. It doesn’t do any good to call the non-oranger a lunatic and dismiss his opinion peremptorily. In the history of civilization, many are the times — metaphorically speaking — that an orange turned out to be a non-orange. Two quick examples will suffice to drive home this point: The heliocentric model of the planetary system trumped over the geocentric model against the stout opposition of church and state; and Pasteur’s germ theory took hold in the scientific community after being ridiculed as fantastic and fanciful. So, why has dialog become such a rarity in modern life? For one, people have allowed their thoughts to become circumscribed by political correctness. They don’t want to offend anyone. The situation is actually far worse: they don’t want to have even a semblance of offensiveness in their speech. For another, people have bought into certain packets of thought that are inviolable to outside contrary influences. If a man believes firmly that a fruit is an orange, why engage with someone who believes that it is not. In egregious instances where the mind is inflamed, people may find sufficient reason to drive the contrarian out of town, or to chuck a few bricks in his direction. I have a great fondness for dialog, especially with people who do not agree with me. One can have a conversation with a roomful of like-minded people and come away from that experience no better or no worse, clutching an orange in one hand, but the universe only opens up when sacrosanct ideas have been rubbed the wrong way by contrary ones. We do not want our minds to become propagandized by the notion that all fruits that look like an orange are oranges.

My apologies to all philosophers. We can discuss Nietzsche or Kafka all day, but our discussions hold no utility in matters of human sustainability. Modern humanity is in freefall, and the sudden stop at the bottom is assured. Human degradation will not be left to discussion—lip service is barred at the door. Actionable methodology must take over, or the Earth will fall silent. We are built by nature to solve problems. Our endless, mindless conflicts are unnatural and thereby doomed. Ancient compulsions drive human paranoia. We’ll either confront them or crumble into dust. 📚 Explore further in the groundbreaking novel, "The Human Injury: A Species in Crisis" available on Amazon: https://a.co/d/8fwUrge #Noesis #ModernHumans #TransformativeAction #TogetherWeRise

Understanding the Modern Tower of Babel: Faith and Technology In this thought-provoking video, we explore the parallels between today's advancements in medicine and technology and the ancient Tower of Babel. Discover how humanity's quest for power raises important questions about faith and grace in our times. Join us for a deep reflection! #TowerOfBabel #FaithAndTechnology #ModernChallenges #SpiritualReflection #MedicineAndFaith #GodsGrace #PhilosophyOfFaith #EthicsInTechnology #ContemporaryIssues #UnderstandingOurTimes

Are miracles possible? How do they align with science? In this new episode of "Tough Theological Questions," I'm discussing the topic of miracles. I'll share my thoughts and personal experiences that reveal the extraordinary ways God works beyond the laws of science. Watch now to explore the mystery of miracles and what they mean for our faith: https://vist.ly/3cm95 #TheologicalQuestions #Miracles #FaithAndScience #JeffStruecker

Something From Nothing: The concept of something coming from nothing is indeed a deep and complex topic that intersects with both philosophy and science. It challenges our understanding of the nature of existence, causality, and the origins of the universe. In scientific terms, the idea that something can arise from nothing is often associated with the Big Bang theory, which posits that the universe originated from a singularity - a point of infinite density and temperature - around 13.8 billion years ago. From a scientific perspective, the Big Bang theory is supported by evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the observed expansion of the universe. However, the nature of what existed before the Big Bang or what caused it to occur remains a subject of speculation and debate among scientists. On the other hand, faith in the Christian context involves belief in the existence of a transcendent, all-powerful God who is the ultimate creator of the universe. For many Christians, the idea that God created the universe out of nothing aligns with their theological beliefs and provides a framework for understanding the origins of existence. Ultimately, the question of how something can originate from nothing raises philosophical and metaphysical considerations that may require a nuanced understanding of both scientific theories and religious beliefs. It is okay to grapple with such profound questions and seek different perspectives to deepen your understanding. It's essential to approach these inquiries with an open mind, curiosity, and a willingness to explore various viewpoints.

In the not so ancient times, when Galileo was canceled by the reigning Christian world view, the argument was that since his theories diverged from popular and pre-ordained conceptions, that they could naturally not be true. "Look at this guy! Total whacko! Dangerous whacko too... Make him STFU!" In hindsight, it may feel self-evident that the pursuit of science did not align with whatever the pursuit of mainstream cultism is. Today the dominating world view in secular matters may spring from science. But to believe that heresy is out of fashion may be a misconception. Popular notions of "science" and dominating spheres of established science create a world where some scientific interpretations are more important than others. There is way more of an interpretative prerogative than many may wish to admit. Way more. Todays heretics don't burn at the stake, they rot away in oblivion.

"Hope is not optimism, which expects things to turn out well, but something rooted in the conviction that there is good worth working for." (Seamus Heaney) I started my philosophical inquiry into #hope from a very sceptic and critical perspective, but soon found myself defending hope - at least modest and careful forms of hope - whenever I talked about it. My latest paper explores the power of relative #powerlessness within #democratic hope - a hope that should at the same time be directed towards preventing experiences of radical powerlessness.