Live!!! Test of Time session is underway. The selected papers will be presented by the authors in person, followed by a short Q&A. https://lnkd.in/gBm_QC2m
NeurIPS’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Read this Editorial from Editor-in-Chief Chris Jones about the growth of JACS Au and the reason for introducing this new manuscript type: https://go.acs.org/ba9 Learn more about the journal's manuscript types: https://go.acs.org/ba8
-
-
Good old days: Authors delayed publication to better the competing paper. Today: -Author: The first version of our paper was posted on the SSRN on XXX, 6 days before YYY. -Author: A recent paper by XXX also implements YYY. We show their method is problematic in several aspects (and of course only our paper deserves a publication in ZZZ). -Reviewer: Though the paper under review studies XXX more comprehensively than YYY (and the empirical tests have no overlap in any shape or form), the current paper’s contribution is clearly insufficient for a top journal such as ZZZ. -Author: Ideal stolen, trust broken. -Editor: The XXX literature has grown astronomically and unfortunately, this paper falls short of... (even though I accepted another 20 papers on XXX). Therefore, I decide to reject your submission.
-
-
#manuscriptmonday GA 800 is an example of a catena manuscript, a manuscript which includes chains of commentary. GA 800 features commentary on the top, bottom, and outside of each page, around the biblical text. See more here: https://buff.ly/4fG7tOS
-
-
Daily posts on AI-Research | AI for Women's Safety | Assistant Professor(Senior Scale) | Assistant Director- Alumni Relations | IEEE (Senior Member) | Social Activist | Mrs. India Pride of Nation Finalist 2017
If you are starting to write a review paper Don't begin this journey without reading at least 30 to 40 papers. Before that, understand the difference between a Review paper and a research paper. Dont mix up these two: Here are the 10 key differences: For more content follow Dr Princy Randhawa
-
-
Interested in submitting your professional manuscript but unsure where to start? 📝 Check out the first video in our 'Preparing Your Professional Manuscript for Submission series' to get started. ✅ 🔗 http://spr.ly/6043QE0Cv #AcademicPublishing
Preparing Your Professional Manuscript for Submission: Part 1
https://www.youtube.com/
-
I hold a PhD in Food Engineering, focusing on using cold plasma to enhance techno-functional properties of food, inactivate microorganisms, and extend food shelf life. I also specialize in food rheology and thermodynamic
I would like to share with you, our newly published paper. https://lnkd.in/dqB43yTZ
-
-
Sustainable Growth Strategist | Long-term geopolitical analysis | Diplomatic innovation | Technological disruption
Two books to read to increase digital sovereignty and scientific ambition, at the foot of the city of Le Mans Roman wall This analysis will be included in a forthcoming book to be published in December 2024. Stay tuned!
-
-
For those of you enamoured by the potential of LLM's to solve our problems using AI instead of us using NI (natural intelligence), read this paper! It is free to download from: https://lnkd.in/eUvxY9gg
Editor (incl. Indigenous style/protocols), Analyst, Researcher, Canadian War Artist (Afghanistan, Task Force 3-09), Opera Architect/Librettist
This is totally a legit research paper folks. What I find particularly compelling is that not only do the authors cite Harry Frankfurt's work on 'bull$hit'* correctly (On Bull$hit, Princeton, 2005), but also the following from the introduction to the paper: "Because these programs cannot themselves be concerned with truth, and because they are designed to produce text that looks truth-apt, without any actual concern for truth, it seems appropriate to call their output bull$hit." Def. worth a read. *note: the exchange of the $ for 's' is mine in the text. I do this so that my texts can't be scraped
-
-
One thing we have been doing in our most recent papers is including a table in the Introduction, summarizing the main features of previous related papers and how the new paper compares with them. In my view, this can help the reviewers/readers a lot in understanding the novelty and research contribution of the manuscript with respect to the existing literature. What do you think? References of the papers corresponding to the tables in the attached figure, from top to bottom and left to right: https://lnkd.in/d5s8usih https://lnkd.in/dSarJ4Xs https://lnkd.in/dywiP7B6 https://lnkd.in/dVNr5q8e https://lnkd.in/dSw82ee8 https://lnkd.in/dsbrsApz
-
