Malcolm Peake CEng FICE’s Post

View profile for Malcolm Peake CEng FICE, graphic

Professional Development Manager - helping people to grow professionally.

A simple illustration of the dangers of technology in the wrong hands. When engineers and technicians engage with new and advancing technology they should do it wisely and check, check again and to be sure check a third time it’s doing what they want it or do. This is #civilengineering

View profile for Chris B., graphic

Senior Business Analyst (with many accolades spanning careers in electronic engineering, IT hardware, IT infrastructure, IT systems, and business services)

Try this for yourselves... 6÷2(1+2)= ? Think again about the trust you place in tech.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Mark Tickner

Systems Engineer | Systems Thinker | Requirements Engineer | CEng | CSEP

2w

If you took a 1990's/2000's era calculator I'm pretty sure you would get the same result. Most calculators evaluate as you go rather than at the end. Reversing the entry to (1+2)2/6 will yield the correct answer in most cases. How you use the tool is an important as the tool itself.

John Nicholas

Supporting our Tunnels through Safety, Engineering & Standards

2w

While this is a basic example, it does lead one to consider the "checking" through governance and assurance processes required around AI and more complex applications.

Richard Brooks

National Service Lead - Civil Structures at Waterman Group

2w

Had my calculator since the start of my career (27 years+). I was very disappointed a few years back when I had to change the battery.

  • No alternative text description for this image

Wow! That’s a worry! My iPhone calculator does it correctly. My Casio calculator changes the syntax after I hit = to 6/(2(1+2)) with the result as 1, despite me typing in the correct syntax. This means that, based on the syntax changed by the calculator, the result is correct, BUT, why does it change syntax?? 🤬

Cem Musabak

Ford Pro Special Vehicles Senior Electrical Engineer

2w

This is due to missing x sign. If you do not add x sign between 2 and (1+2) then it converts equation into this: 6/(2x(1+2)) by adding brackets. If you write 6/2x(1+2) then you get correct result. Must be some form of parsing issue.

Uri Muvuti, CEng MICE MSc BSc BCom

Associate Director at Waterman Group

2w

It’s shocking 😮 Casio have to fix this soon. Now I know why I didn’t get top marks in my Finite Element Analysis exam 😃 Blame Casio.

Olivier COLAS

CEng MSc DIC, Senior Geotechnical Engineer at Systra

2w

Luckily we have chatGPT now ^^

  • No alternative text description for this image
David-Paul Grima

MSc DIC EUR Ing FCABE CEng FICE | Chartered Engineer | Architect | Director at SASMalta | Fellow of the Institution of Civil Engineers | Fellow of the Chartered Association of Building Engineers

2w

Insightful

Like
Reply
Aisling Guilfoyle

Awarded WIC's Next-Gen Woman of the Year 2021 - Middle East, Africa & South Asia | Project Manager @WSP in the Middle East | Delivering Exceptional Projects

2w

Interesting post, its given me a healthy scepticism using my phone to quickly do equations, luckily the mnemonics of BOMDAS / BODMAS is forever etched in my mind since school.

Eliot Taylor

PhD. Ireland, Africa, UK freshwater ecology, catchment management and water resources expert

2w

Mine won't let you enter that format

  • No alternative text description for this image
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics