There are often many solutions to a challenge – but when multiple programs are found to be equally effective, how do you proceed? Interventions cost a lot – they take time, money, and effort. Conducting a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis can help you decide: https://j-p.al/CEA
J-PAL South Asia’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
1️⃣ Essential practice one: intended change & measuring impact The first of the five essential Common Foundations practices is to describe how and why your work will create change. This practice is an essential part of any impact measurement approach. 📖 Learn about all five essential practices at https://buff.ly/3qyEwhA 💬 Read reflections on "good enough" measurement practices at https://buff.ly/459MGxF
-
-
I'll have another go with this one. Explanation of why critical path analysis is unsuitable for delay claims, and why its adoption by the industry is an error. Edit: for avoidance of doubt, the charts do not show when the delay events arise (other than to the extent described), they show the effects of the events on the extension/completion of the project.
-
➡️ Control Chart Rules Explained with Case Study: https://lnkd.in/deb2xkip
-
-
➡️ Control Chart Rules Explained with Case Study: https://lnkd.in/deb2xkip
-
-
Need a tool to assess practice guidelines? Learn more with the Critical Appraisal of Guidelines module: http://ow.ly/LW8930sFluZ
-
2️⃣ Essential practice two: using indicators to measure change The second of the five essential Common Foundations practices is to use indicators to help you assess how successfully your work is creating progress and change, and what progress and change is being created. Using indicators to measure change is another essential practice of many impact measurement approaches. 📖 Learn about all five essential practices at https://buff.ly/3qyEwhA 💬 Read reflections on "good enough" measurement practices at https://buff.ly/459MGxF
-
