Joost Rietveld’s Post

View profile for Joost Rietveld, graphic
Joost Rietveld Joost Rietveld is an Influencer

Associate Professor at UCL • Expert in digital platforms and video games • Publisher of Platform Papers

Yesterday (July 18) was the final day under the merger agreement between Microsoft and Activision. The merger hasn’t consummated, so what happens next? Today, it was announced that the parties agreed to an extension of the merger agreement until October 18. As part of the revised agreement, Microsoft has increased the termination fee payable to Activision (in the off-chance the merger isn’t finalized before the new termination date) to $4.5 billion. The article linked below further states that Activision has agreed to potentially “hold separate the Company or certain assets of the Company or to implement other lawful alternatives to consummate the Merger” with UK regulators. The merger has now been cleared in 40 countries with the UK being the only holdout left. On Monday, the Competition Appeal Tribunal in the UK agreed to adjourn under strict conditions the pending appeal trial between the Competition Markets Authority and Microsoft. Watching Monday’s hearing, it became clear that the judge set those conditions to avoid any gamesmanship by the CMA. It also became clear that the CMA changed tack and is now a lot more cooperative towards Microsoft. By extending the merger agreement, Microsoft shows it is willing to engage with the regulator, find an acceptable solution to its concerns (without harming the intentions of the merger), and maintain a productive relationship with an eye on any future acquisitions. One of the remaining open questions is what Microsoft is proposing to the CMA that would be an acceptable remedy to clear the deal. In Monday’s hearing, it looked like all parties have a specific arrangement in mind where the whole of Activision is being acquired with the exception of certain assets. The lawyers referred to an older case between two two spirits makers where the target’s whisky’s assets were divested to allay competition concerns in the whisky market. This case looks to be a template where, perhaps, Activision’s cloud gaming rights are the equivalent of whisky and the relevant market is cloud gaming… Microsoft increasing the termination fee by a whopping $1.5 billion signals it is confident the deal will close. Investors appear to agree as the Activision share price hasn’t moved too much following this news. The CMA has set itself a new deadline for the updated investigation of August 29, so the deal might clear well before the new merger agreement is set to expire. #microsoft #activision #merger #acquisition #cma #cat #cloudgaming #videogames #corporatestrategy #whisky Microsoft Activision Blizzard Competition and Markets Authority UCL School of Management

Microsoft and Activision Blizzard extend merger agreement to October

Microsoft and Activision Blizzard extend merger agreement to October

theverge.com

Since cloud gaming is a problem for the CMA, Microsoft can spin off its cloud gaming as a separate company in the UK and get rid of its objections. Likewise, since the FTC focused all of its efforts on Call of Duty, even if the courts were putting a stop to it, MS could likely remedy the issue by creating "Call of Duty Studios", spinning Call of Duty off to a separate company, and satisfying the FTC's complaint.

Like
Reply
Rudolph Scoggins

Principal | Consultant | Engineering | Defense

1y

IMO, one might easily anticipate that upon full and complete closure of this huge merger, the resulting value of the integrated financial and operational infrastructure and assets (from both companies) could boost the overall realized value of the deal to shareholders to in excess of five times (i.e., by 5x+ ($345 billion)). In the end, there's a really big payday coming down the pipe.

Like
Reply
Fides Eich

Freelance PC and Technology Consultant

1y

Joost Rietveld Hello :) I think the UK holding out is the smart move. I think that all other countries failed to reach a deal that is actually good for the market People have been asking for Linux gaming which can't happen so long as Microsoft is in control of Windows and Direct X. If they were to use Vulkan instead of Direct X.. That would make a lot of people happy

Like
Reply

Microsoft needs to buy, and put, video into them.

Philip Crawford

East Los Angeles Collage

1y

I wonder how much will it will cost the public to play the games from Microsoft. I see games on my windows 10 laptop which some cost a lot.

Like
Reply
Denys Zaichenko

Honesty-as-a-Service, Head of Partnership @Smbee Tech "Unlimited Graphic Design & WEB Development"

1y

The increase in the breakup fee demonstrates the seriousness of Microsoft's commitment to the Activision deal.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics