Everything Ends’ Post

How often are you using ChatGPT in your business? We’ve been doing a series on AI over on PRmoment to try to understand how much (or how little) PR professionals are using AI at the moment. We recently asked Will Cooke, Catherine Warrilow 😊, Kelsey Farish, Alex Warren, Lucy Horsman, Becca T., Georgia O'Brien-Perry, Alison Shadrack Brown, Sarah Stella Edwards and Philippe Borremans for their top tips. Their top ten tips for using ChatGPT were: 1. Get back ideas out the way early 2. …and use it as a foundation to build good ideas 3. Take caution as the legal terrain is still the Wild West 4. The better version might not cut it 5. Use ChatGPT to help make specialist information exciting 6. ChatGPT can replace your spelling and grammar checker 7. … and makes localising text from UK to US English a breeze 8. Treat ChatGPT as an extra team member 9. Don’t use ChatGPT’s responses verbatim 10. Simulate and plan for crisis situations before they occur Read more about their tips here: https://lnkd.in/e5G93EWd 

A recent article by Lawyers Weekly reveals that two-thirds of Australian lawyers now use ChatGPT for professional purposes. This significant adoption underscores how generative AI tools are impacting the legal industry. 👩⚖️👨⚖️ Whether you're already leveraging AI in your work or curious about its potential, this piece offers valuable insights into how your peers are integrating this technology. 🔗 Read the full article here - https://loom.ly/2sR4zP4 #LegalTech #AIinLaw #ChatGPT

The more I share how ChatGPT can be used by legal bloggers and writers, the more I hear, especially from lawyers, that GPT, by giving wrong advice, is dangerous and unethical. Dave Winer’s comments over the weekend were spot on. “To people who say you get wrong answers from ChatGPT, if I wanted my car to kill me I could drive into oncoming traffic. If I wanted my calculator to give me incorrect results I could press the wrong keys. In other words, ChatGPT is a very new tool. It can be hard to control, you have to check what it says, and try different questions. But the result, if you pay attention and don't drive it under the wheels of a bus, is that you can do things you never could do before.” Agreed. I use GPT throughout the day. I get more done on more things in a more creative way than I ever got done before GPT. I get ideas, drafts, insight and feedback on items I am working on. Moves things along much faster and at higher level of that than ever. Obviously I would review and digest what it’s saying - just as I would around any written documents or insight - even coming from a lawyer. If you did trial work, think of jury instructions from your state’s model jury instructions. Without those model jury instructions, you, the other side and the judge would be dead in knowing where to straight in crafting and arguing on proper instructions. But those instructions only propelled you forward, you never took them verbatim. They were a start. A heck of a start which even guided you in how you presented your case. But you read them over and reviewed cased law to see how those instructions applied to your case. Florida lawyer, Richard Georges, hit on the same point this morning commenting on what I had shared. “As for those who say lawyers can get into trouble using it, we say that AI product is just a starting point, and that editing and rewriting its content in the lawyer's voice, and checking the accuracy of its fact statements, are just as essential to its use. So, learn how to use Chat GPT, grasshopper, or be left in the dust.” The knee jerk reaction of of a lot of lawyers that AI is something dangerous or unethical is a bigger problem than many realize. It limits access to legal services. (The bottom of my street)

AI tools like ChatGPT have reinvigorated the conversation around AI in legal practice, and has us asking the big questions: Can AI make your job easier? Will it change the legal industry? Is it a tool, a threat, or just hype? https://lnkd.in/gAJS4Pgk

Good day, all! 🇬🇧 There's a fascinating piece doing the rounds on Clio's blog about whether AI, specifically ChatGPT, could replace lawyers. It's a thought-provoking read that delves into the potential of AI in the legal sector, but also highlights the limitations of current technology. While AI can certainly help with tasks like document review and legal research, it's still a far cry from the nuanced understanding and human touch that a seasoned solicitor brings to the table. The article concludes that AI will be a tool for lawyers, not a replacement. At IDS, we're excited about the potential of AI in legal technology. Our services, such as #ArtificialIntelligence and #ManagedServices, are designed to streamline legal processes, not replace the professionals who drive them. We believe in technology that empowers, not replaces. Here's to a future where #LegalTech is shaped by the brilliant minds at IDS, creating a more efficient legal ecosystem. 🚀👩‍💼👨‍💼 #IDS #AI #LegalInnovation #FutureLaw

ChatGPT: Revolutionizing Legal Support with Artificial Intelligence | Way2Unknown Introduction: In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in various industries, and the legal field is no exception. One notable tool that has emerged is ChatGPT, an AI-powered chatbot that has proven to be a valuable asset in providing legal support. With its advanced language processing capabilities, ChatGPT is revolutionizing the way legal professionals work and interact with clients. Checkout for more details: https://lnkd.in/gnUXSkDm #ChatGPT #UsesofChatGpt #UsesOfAI #ArtificialIntelligence #OpenAI #Article #AI #w2u #way2unknown

Generative AI tools like ChatGPT are revolutionizing the legal industry, promising efficiency gains while raising concerns about accuracy and ethics. Despite the legal sector's cautious approach, emerging AI tools are gaining traction among professionals. https://lnkd.in/gnwgZ5rc #LegalTech #Ai #GenerativeAI #LegalAutomation

👉Ask ChatGPT: Can you list recent algorithms created specifically for LEGAL RESEARCH with relevant URL's in text format ChatGPT🤖 Here are some recent algorithms and tools developed specifically for legal research, along with relevant URLs in text format for further reading and exploration: ROSS Intelligence Description: Uses natural language processing to answer legal questions, providing relevant case law, statutes, and secondary sources. URL: https://lnkd.in/et2TXGMG Casetext CARA A.I. Description: Analyzes legal documents and provides relevant case law and analysis, using contextual and semantic understanding. URL: https://lnkd.in/e5MmjaHJ LexisNexis Context Description: Uses advanced analytics to provide insights into judges, courts, and opposing counsel based on historical data. URL: https://lnkd.in/e4bWWkBk Westlaw Edge Description: Incorporates AI to enhance legal research, offering features like litigation analytics, statutes compare, and judicial analytics. URL: https://lnkd.in/eGe8Azzv Blue J Legal Description: Uses machine learning to predict legal outcomes and provide insights on tax law and other legal areas. URL: https://lnkd.in/e6iWfM8K Ravel Law Description: Provides visualizations and analytics of case law to uncover patterns and trends, aiding in legal strategy. URL: https://www.ravellaw.com/ Judicata Description: Offers a comprehensive analysis of legal briefs and provides detailed feedback to improve arguments and citations. URL: https://www.judicata.com/ Everlaw Description: Combines predictive coding and other AI-driven features for e-discovery and legal research. URL: https://www.everlaw.com/ Lawgeex Description: Uses AI to review contracts and provide insights, helping legal teams to ensure compliance and mitigate risks. URL: https://www.lawgeex.com/ Luminance Description: Applies machine learning to legal document review, contract analysis, and due diligence processes. URL: https://www.luminance.com/ These tools represent the cutting-edge of AI and machine learning applications in legal research, providing enhanced capabilities for legal professionals to conduct research more efficiently and effectively. 4o

The issue here is largely HOW the judge uses #generativeAI and specifically #chatGPT - he uses it for fact checking, which is not (yet) the right use case and as we know, ChatGPT can hallucinate/completely make stuff up. He is certainly not the first judge to use ChatGPT in a ruling. Link here (in this article) to our brand new Gen AI report out next week, make sure you're the first to get it. #legaltech https://lnkd.in/evyRUefM

Since the boom of ChatGPT in late 2022, I’ve been an advocate for AI in law. But yesterday, I came across a job posting that stunned me. A renowned advocate was looking for an associate, with one specific requirement: "The candidate must not rely on AI." At first, I couldn’t believe it. In 2024, when AI tools have already revolutionized legal research, drafting, and workflow management, there are renowned law firms which are partnering with AI platforms and there are a huge rise in the LegalTech startups then how could this mindset persist? Then I thought about the fears underpinning such a demand - Hallucinations by AI in the legal field. This incident leaves its marks, from the high-profile case of a New York lawyer who was sanctioned for quoting fabricated judgments from ChatGPT. Mistakes such as these are what should fuel skepticism, but banning AI altogether? Not a good approach. Consider this - - The use of AI in law firms has jumped from 23% in 2023 to 34% in 2024. In larger organizations, it’s even more prominent—90% of in-house legal teams already leverage generative AI. [Source: National Law Review] - AI can save lawyers approximately 200 hours a year by automating repetitive tasks, freeing time for strategy and client work [Source: Thomson Reuters] As per the survey by Thomson Reuters, nearly 80% of legal professionals believe AI will profoundly impact their work within the next five years. Judges are adapting too. Some courts now require lawyers to disclose their use of AI in filings to maintain transparency and accountability. It indicates that the legal system is not afraid of AI; it's just trying to find a way to responsibly use it. But Hallucinations fear is still there. But let’s talk about solutions. Enter Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)—a game-changing approach in AI development. Unlike traditional AI models that generate text based solely on their training data, RAG retrieves real-time, verified information from external databases to enhance accuracy. Maybe Think of RAG as combining a seasoned librarian with a creative writer. With RAG, Lawyers can trust the information AI provides because it is based on credible sources and not guesses. They can input their proprietary databases to have tailored, context-specific outputs. The risks of hallucination significantly decrease, which will align AI with the precision demands of the legal industry. For instance, in drafting a motion, RAG ensures that the AI does not just generate boilerplate language but pulls in specific statutes or precedents from up-to-date repositories. To sum up, as per my belief, the future of AI in law isn’t about blindly trusting technology but about using it responsibly. With innovations like RAG, the legal industry can move from skepticism to confidence… confidence in the Legal Tech industry all together. Source: Future of Professionals Report | Thomson Reuters 2024 #LegalTech #AIinLaw #GenAI #Innovation #LegalAI #AI #AITrends