Emily T. Acosta’s Post

View profile for Emily T. Acosta, graphic

Trial Attorney & Consumer Advocate

The 7th Circuit, which has been (and remains) a leading voice in written advocacy and legal writing style, continues to champion the use of more modern and easier-to-read fonts over more traditional (and archaic) typefaces, like Times New Roman. Here's to hoping Courts continue to follow this Circuit's lead! #modernlegalwriting #typography #RetireTNR #7thCircuit #AppellateLawyer #Advocacy #legalwriting

View profile for James Smith, graphic

Trial Lawyer/Neutral (retired judge) focusing on complex commercial litigation

"What a cool font!" I doubt any judge ever uttered those words. Here, Judge Frank Easterbrook (7th Cir.) used an opinion to remind lawyers that many fonts aren't suitable for longform writings like appellate briefs. The comparison of fonts at the end of the opinion is a great example of show vs. tell advocacy, too! Your brief should stand out because it is clear and easy to understand, not because you used a unique font.

Daniel Massoglia

Director, First Defense Legal Aid Civil Rights Clinic

7mo

lol this is so wonky

Like
Reply
Jason W. Voelke

Trial Attorney (KY, TN, TX) and Registered Nurse (IN)

6mo

Long live Times New Roman!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics