Ana Sofia Amieva-Wang’s Post

I had the opportunity to travel to a housing conference this weekend, hosted by Funders For Housing and Opportunity. Half a session in, the Supreme Court made public its decision in Grants Pass v. Johnson, allowing the City of Grants Pass to punish unhoused people for sleeping outdoors even when no alternative shelters are available. The ruling is a clearly articulated reminder that in the richest country in the world, we repeatedly choose to criminalize poor people, immigrants, disabled people, BIPOC and LGBTQ communities, instead of investing in housing, public health, and social services. This ruling opens the door to other states and municipalities adopting racist policies that allow for the ticketing and arrest of unhoused people, simply because they cannot afford the skyrocketing cost of housing. Society will not be safer. Human trafficking, violence, sexual assault, and other public health risks will increase. What does it mean that in the wealthiest states and communities across the country, we are walking back basic rights and long fought for resources meant to serve the poorest and unhoused? Friends in this work, I hope we will not let new immigrants become a scapegoat. I hope we will stay centered. https://lnkd.in/dauApseV National Low Income Housing Coalition

NLIHC Statement on Supreme Court Ruling in City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson

NLIHC Statement on Supreme Court Ruling in City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson

nlihc.org

Mark H.

Strategic Planning Consultant, Sustainability Designer; Historian of STEAM + Urban-Regional Infrastructure Systems

6mo

It is morally wrong, cruel, and short-sighted to punish people for policy + market failures in terms of housing, services, economic opportunity, etc.

Like
Reply
Nancy Turner

Resource Development in Community Development

6mo

Well said.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics