LinkedIn and 3rd parties use essential and non-essential cookies to provide, secure, analyze and improve our Services, and to show you relevant ads (including professional and job ads) on and off LinkedIn. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
Select Accept to consent or Reject to decline non-essential cookies for this use. You can update your choices at any time in your settings.
Many new MBA grads want to buy a business rather than join or start one. That's thanks to an increasingly popular strategy known as entrepreneurship through acquisition, which argues that would-be business owners are better off purchasing an existing company than trying to raise venture capital for a startup. The philosophy is appealing at a time when hiring in consulting and finance has slowed and more MBA students are open to alternative career paths — likely explaining why ETA courses are suddenly spreading beyond the Harvard and Stanford MBA classrooms where the subject was first espoused.
Wharton, Yale, the University of Chicago and the University of Michigan are looking to cash in on the trend with beefed-up ETA curricula, Bloomberg reports.
This has been a fascinating generational trend to watch, as Boomer-founded businesses either face being closed down or sold due to a lack of organic succession.
This trend started right after I left B-school back in 2010, but I think it’s way better for #MBA graduates to use their skills in running actual businesses than to go into corporate environments where they may lack P/L and hiring managerial responsibility.
Many of you know I teach Entrepreneurship Through Acquisition (ETA) at Washington University in St. Louis - Olin Business School, and co-led a search in 2017. As opposed to building a startup from nothing, acquisition entrepreneurs buy an existing business with product-market fit. ETA's been around for a long time, but we're witnessing early days of a ramp-up, as a solution to the 'silver tsunami' as baby boomers exit. Contact me to learn more.
#eta#buyandbuild
Engagement in an AI Driven, Asynchronous World | Builder | Top Voice | Video Virtuoso | Content Curator | Host, Turn the Lens podcast and Work 20XX podcast
Curious. How the things divvy up by
i) Lifestyle business, vs
ii) Potential roll-ups vs
iii) Potential concepts ripe for expansion?
When I was in B-School, seems like everyone wanted to roll up dry cleaners.
Founder, CultureRx® l Co-creator of the Results-Only Work Environment® (ROWE®) | Management & Organizational Change Consultant l Management Innovation l Best-Selling Author
Yet one more example of how our outdated work environment (all office, policy-based hybrid, all remote, core hours, no meeting Wednesdays and too many meetings on all other days, 4-day workweek, etc) is driving talent to seek alternative solutions.
"It can also satisfy younger generation's desire for a #purposedriven career, rather than toiling long hours for some global conglomerate or a mercurial startup founder."
Those conglomerates are doing good, necessary, amazing work customers who need them - but all of that is TOTALLY not front of mind for employees who are more focused on what the rules and policies say about where they have to put in their time from today...
It doesn't have to be this way. But if businesses and leaders are going to continue to value taking attendance at the corporate office (or home office), and making sure their employees are "busy," we will continue to see trends like this.
Any business can keep it's employees engaged through purpose driven work - but the pathway isn't policies or rules, it's accountability + autonomy.
Career & Job Search Strategist, former retained executive recruiter
I wonder if this is because of the example set by Stanford which has developed into an institution known for creating new businesses?